On the Cyberknife Dose Fraction of Liver Cancer Treatment
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100039
- CyberKnife
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The participants are from 30 to 80 years of age, without gender restriction
- With the hepatopathy background, the diagnosis of primary hepatic carcinoma is confirmed by image examination and laboratory test(the diagnosis criteria is according to the primary hepatic carcinoma rule of diagnosis and treat in 2007)
- The max diameter of single tumor ≤5cm
- Child-Pugh Classification(CPC) A or B
- ECOG score 0 or 1
- Leukocyte is more than 2×109/L and thrombocyte is more than 60×109/L
- Kidney function is normal
- Unsuitable or rejecting other therapies such as resection, liver transplantation etc
- Anticipated lifetime is longer than six months
- The participants who are voluntary comply with the requirements of research
- The participants agree to sign the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The metastasis occur outside of liver
- Child-Pugh Classification(CPC)
- The outline of tumor is not confirmed by image examination
- With hepatic or any other abdomen radiotherapy history before
- With severe internal medicine diseases
- Bone marrow haematopoietic function or kidney function is severe failure
- Intractable ascites
- The position of tumor is nearby esophagus, stomach or intestine
- The normal liver volume less than 700 cm3
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental Group One
In this group ,the participants receive the dose fraction of 49Gy/7f (BED 83.3Gy) by cyberknife.
|
The investigators divide the participants randomly into 3 groups by SPSS 19.0.Three groups participants receive the different dose fraction(49Gy/7f,54Gy/6f and 55Gy/5f),which also means different Biologic Equivalent Dose.Through the research,the investigators want to find out the optimum dose fraction method,which makes the treatment safe, effective and personalized.
|
|
Experimental Group Two
In this group ,the participants receive the dose fraction of 54Gy/6f(BED 102.6Gy) by cyberknife.
|
The investigators divide the participants randomly into 3 groups by SPSS 19.0.Three groups participants receive the different dose fraction(49Gy/7f,54Gy/6f and 55Gy/5f),which also means different Biologic Equivalent Dose.Through the research,the investigators want to find out the optimum dose fraction method,which makes the treatment safe, effective and personalized.
|
|
Control Group
In this group ,the participants receive the dose fraction of 55Gy/5f(115.5Gy)
by cyberknife.
|
The investigators divide the participants randomly into 3 groups by SPSS 19.0.Three groups participants receive the different dose fraction(49Gy/7f,54Gy/6f and 55Gy/5f),which also means different Biologic Equivalent Dose.Through the research,the investigators want to find out the optimum dose fraction method,which makes the treatment safe, effective and personalized.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Local control rate
Time Frame: From date of the participants completing the therapy until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 36 months.
|
Local control illustrates the time from the tumor appearance to progress (the diameter more than or equal to 1.5 times of original) .The ratio of the number of the local control patients to the whole number of patients is local control rate.
|
From date of the participants completing the therapy until the date of first documented progression, assessed up to 36 months.
|
|
Overall survival rate
Time Frame: From date of the participants diagnosed until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 36 months.
|
Overall survival rate means the ratio of the number of patients who are alive to the whole patients after the treatment.
|
From date of the participants diagnosed until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 36 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
RILD rate
Time Frame: From the date of radiotherapy completion until the 4 months after therapy,up to 6 months.
|
the rate of radiotherapy induced liver disease
|
From the date of radiotherapy completion until the 4 months after therapy,up to 6 months.
|
|
Child-Pugh score
Time Frame: From the date of radiotherapy completion until the 4 months after therapy,up to 6 months.
|
By testing the liver function,coagulation function and ascites,we could calculate the Child-Pugh score,which reflect the liver function roundly.
|
From the date of radiotherapy completion until the 4 months after therapy,up to 6 months.
|
|
the value of ICG R15
Time Frame: From the date of radiotherapy completion until the 4 months after therapy,up to 6 months.
|
It means the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes,which reflects the liver reserve.
|
From the date of radiotherapy completion until the 4 months after therapy,up to 6 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Su TS, Lu HZ, Cheng T, Zhou Y, Huang Y, Gao YC, Tang MY, Jiang HY, Lian ZP, Hou EC, Liang P. Long-term survival analysis in combined transarterial embolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy versus stereotactic body radiation monotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma >5 cm. BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2894-9.
- Stenmark MH, Cao Y, Wang H, Jackson A, Ben-Josef E, Ten Haken RK, Lawrence TS, Feng M. Estimating functional liver reserve following hepatic irradiation: adaptive normal tissue response models. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jun;111(3):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 8.
- Dewas S, Bibault JE, Mirabel X, Fumagalli I, Kramar A, Jarraya H, Lacornerie T, Dewas-Vautravers C, Lartigau E. Prognostic factors affecting local control of hepatic tumors treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;7:166. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-166.
- Goodman BD, Mannina EM, Althouse SK, Maluccio MA, Cardenes HR. Long-term safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatic oligometastases. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Mar-Apr;6(2):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
- Liang P, Huang C, Liang SX, Li YF, Huang SX, Lian ZP, Liu JM, Tang Y, Lu HJ. Effect of CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma on hepatic toxicity. Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Nov 18;9:7169-7175. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S112290. eCollection 2016.
- Que J, Kuo HT, Lin LC, Lin KL, Lin CH, Lin YW, Yang CC. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of cyberknife stereotactic body radiation therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 12;16:451. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2512-x.
- Schoenberg M, Khandoga A, Stintzing S, Trumm C, Schiergens TS, Angele M, Op den Winkel M, Werner J, Muacevic A, Rentsch M. CyberKnife Radiosurgery - Value as an Adjunct to Surgical Treatment of HCC? Cureus. 2016 Apr 28;8(4):e591. doi: 10.7759/cureus.591.
- Su TS, Liang P, Lu HZ, Liang J, Gao YC, Zhou Y, Huang Y, Tang MY, Liang JN. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for small primary or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in 132 Chinese patients. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;113(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.24128. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
- Lo CH, Huang WY, Lin KT, Lin MJ, Lin TP, Jen YM. Repeated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using CyberKnife for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;29(11):1919-25. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12659.
- Que JY, Lin LC, Lin KL, Lin CH, Lin YW, Yang CC. The efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy on huge hepatocellular carcinoma unsuitable for other local modalities. Radiat Oncol. 2014 May 28;9:120. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-120.
- Lo CH, Huang WY, Lee MS, Lin KT, Lin TP, Chang PY, Fan CY, Jen YM. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who failed or were unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;26(3):345-52. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000032.
- Bibault JE, Dewas S, Vautravers-Dewas C, Hollebecque A, Jarraya H, Lacornerie T, Lartigau E, Mirabel X. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: prognostic factors of local control, overall survival, and toxicity. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 11;8(10):e77472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077472. eCollection 2013.
- Yoon HI, Koom WS, Lee IJ, Jeong K, Chung Y, Kim JK, Lee KS, Han KH, Seong J. The significance of ICG-R15 in predicting hepatic toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2012 Aug;32(7):1165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2012.02784.x. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
- Sun J, Zhang A, Li W, Wang Q, Li D, Zhang D, Duan X. Biologically effective dose (BED) escalation of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients (</=5 cm) with CyberKnife: protocol of study. Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 28;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1471-1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- duanxuezhang
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on CyberKnife Radiosurgery
-
NCT02374983UnknownGamma Knife Radiosurgery
-
NCT01226004UnknownProstate Cancer Early Risk Treated by Radiosurgery | Prostate Cancer Intermediate Risk Treated by Radiosurgery
-
NCT03548428RecruitingSarcoma | Radiosurgery
-
NCT03963713UnknownRadiotherapy | Spine Metastases | Radiosurgery
-
NCT04218617RecruitingSpine Metastases | Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (sSRS)
-
NCT05060653WithdrawnNeoplasm Metastasis | Surgery | Spinal Neoplasms | Radiosurgery
-
NCT07015710CompletedGamma Knife Radiosurgery | Tectal Plate Gliomas
-
NCT05177185Not yet recruitingBrain Metastases | Radiosurgery
-
NCT05868928RecruitingBrain Metastases | Radiosurgery
-
NCT05810428Enrolling by invitationMagnetic Resonance Imaging | Artificial Intelligence | Virtual Reality | Trigeminal Neuralgia | Trigeminal Nerve Diseases | Radiosurgery
Clinical Trials on Dose fraction forms
-
NCT06462963RecruitingBreast Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | NSCLC | Prostate Cancer | Oligometastatic Disease
-
NCT01965223Completed
-
NCT06885671Not yet recruitingBreast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)
-
NCT01890096Unknown
-
NCT06027892Recruiting
-
NCT06173401Recruiting