Prevention of the Progression of Coronary Calcification With Use of Spironolactone in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

October 15, 2017 updated by: Alex Sandro Rolland de Souza, Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute

Effect of Spironolactone on the Progression of Coronary Calcification in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Vascular calcification is a frequent complication in dialysis patients and is strongly associated with mortality. Its pathogenesis is complex and involves a series of markers that act on the vascular microenvironment. There is evidence that aldosterone is one of the biomarkers and may have a role in osteoinductive pathways.The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of spironolactone, an inhibitor of mineralocorticoid receptor, in the progression of coronary calcification in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Pernambuco
      • Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, 50070-550
        • Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Coronary calcium score > 30 Agatston unit
  • Peritoneal dialysis for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of spironolactone in the last 3 months
  • Mean serum potassium > 6 mEq/L in the last 3 months
  • Cardiac revascularization surgeries
  • Arrhythmias
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Spironolactone group
Spironolactone oral tablet 25mg/day, for 12 months
Drug: Spironolactone 25Mg Tablet
Patients with coronary calcium score > 30 were treated with spironolactone for 12 months
No Intervention: Control group
No spironolactone use

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative progression of the coronary calcium score
Time Frame: 12 months
Percentage change in coronary calcium score from baseline to end of study. Coronary calcium score detected using multi-detector computed tomography and expressed in Agatston units.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute progression of the coronary calcium score
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate the absolute progression of the coronary calcium score, defined as the difference between the final score and the baseline score. Coronary calcium score detected using multi-detector computed tomography and expressed in Agatston units.
12 months
Adverse effects of spironolactone use
Time Frame: 12 months
During follow-up, all patients were assessed monthly to evaluate the frequency of hyperpotassemia (serum potassium > 6mEq/L), hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg) and/or diastolic blood pressure < 60 mmHg) and gynecomastia defined as breast augmentation, painful or not.
12 months
1 year change in laboratory parameters of mineral metabolism
Time Frame: 12 months
Assess changes in serum levels of total calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, 25(OH) vitamina D and intact parathyroid hormone, through periodic blood dosages of these parameters, during follow-up.
12 months
Need for spironolactone dose reduction
Time Frame: 12 months
In the presence of adverse effects, the dose of spironolactone was reduced from 25 to 12,5 mg per day.
12 months
Causes of discontinuation of the study
Time Frame: 12 months
Severe hyperpotassemia defined as serum potassium>7mEq/L; lack of improvement in the adverse effects of spironolactone with a dose reduction of 12,5 mg/day, ie, persistence of breasts enlargement, hypotension and hyperpotassemia (serum potassium < 6mEq/L); discontinuation of peritoneal dialysis due to renal transplantation or the need for hemodialysis transfer; withdrawal of consent at any time; and death were considered as causes for discontinuation of the study. For the evaluation of this outcome, the patients were submitted to medical visit and biochemical measures monthly.
12 months
1 year change in laboratory parameters related to inflammation.
Time Frame: 12 months
Assess changes on serum levels of c-reactive protein, albumin and fetuin-A, through periodic blood dosages of these parameters, during follow-up.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Professor Fernando Figueira Integral Medicine Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Federal University of São Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ana Paula S Gueiros, MD, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira
  • Principal Investigator: Alex SR Souza, PhD, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira
  • Study Director: Aluizio B Carvalho, PhD, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo
  • Study Chair: José E Gueiros, MD, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira
  • Study Chair: Leuridan T Cavalcante, PhD, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira
  • Study Chair: Dulce E Casarini, PhD, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo
  • Study Chair: Marina M Cadena, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira
  • Study Chair: Karina T Nobrega, MD, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira
  • Study Chair: Eveline B Calado, MD, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 7, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 10, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 10, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • U1111-1203-1767

Drug and device information, study documents

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Calcification

Clinical Trials on Spironolactone 25Mg Tablet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings