The Engaged4Life Study: Enhancing the Health-Promoting Effects of Older Adults' Activity Portfolios
Enhancing the Health-Promoting Effects of Older Adults' Activity Portfolios: The Development, Feasibility and Initial Efficacy of an Ecologically Sensitive Intervention
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age of 65 or older
- Low-to-moderate engagement levels as determined by a score of <10 on a modified version of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) (Hwang, 2010), where only the domains of exercise, social and productive activity, and leisure were included
- A resident of Waltham, MA
- Willing to be randomly assigned to study arm
- Available for relevant study dates
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age of 64 or younger
- Living in an assisted living or nursing home facility
- Significant cognitive impairment (those with >2 errors on the six-item screener by Callahan, Unverzagt, Hui, Perkins, & Hendrie, 2002)
- Reports that a doctor has told them that it is unsafe to participate in physical activity
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Engaged4Life
Participants randomly assigned to this group receive: 1) technology-assisted self-monitoring of daily activity via a Fitbit Zip worn daily (for 8 weeks) and a daily tablet self-report survey (completed for a 7-day period at baseline and a second 7-day period 4-weeks later); and 2) a one-time, 3hr workshop and peer mentoring (via phone 2X/week for 3 weeks).
The workshop includes psychoeducation on the relationship between active engagement and health and well-being and a goal setting activity focused on carefully assessing and then make improvements upon existing "activity portfolios".
Peer mentors provide support as participants implement their goals.
|
Participants receive a Fitbit Zip, an iPad Mini tablet device, training on how to use the Fitbit and iPad, and are asked to complete brief surveys each night on their activity engagement that day (for two 7-day periods).
Participants receive a 3-hour Engaged4Life Workshop (psychoeducation + goal setting) and one-on-one peer mentoring via phone 2X/week for 3 weeks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Technology-assisted self-monitoring only
Participants randomly assigned to this group receive: 1) technology-assisted self-monitoring of daily activity via a Fitbit Zip worn daily (for 8 weeks) and a daily tablet self-report survey (completed for a 7-day period at baseline and a second 7-day period 4-weeks later).
While it is expected that wearing the Fitbit and raising consciousness of activity engagement may initially result in behavior change, it is not expected to have a sustained impact on outcomes over time.
|
Participants receive a Fitbit Zip, an iPad Mini tablet device, training on how to use the Fitbit and iPad, and are asked to complete brief surveys each night on their activity engagement that day (for two 7-day periods).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Activity: Steps per day
Time Frame: worn daily for 8 weeks
|
Measured using the Fitbit Zip pedometer
|
worn daily for 8 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cognitive activity (CA)(assessed daily)
Time Frame: asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
|
Cognitive activity (CA) assessed daily was measured as respondents' assessment of the number of cognitively stimulating activities they had participated in that day from a list of 13 activities plus one possible write-in "other" activity.
|
asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
|
|
Social interaction (SI) (assessed daily)
Time Frame: asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
|
Social interaction (SI) questions focused on the quantity (the number of social interactions the respondent had that day, including in-person, by telephone, or by video, but NOT including email, text, or social media) and the quality (whether the participant had a problematic social interaction that day and the perceived stress of the problematic social interaction; and whether the participant had a positive social interaction that day and the perceived positivity of that social interaction) of daily social interactions.
|
asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
|
|
Personal meaning (PM) (assessed daily)
Time Frame: asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
|
Respondents were asked 4 questions around whether they did anything that day that 1) benefited others, 2) left them feeling personally satisfied or accomplished, 3) felt significant in the broader scheme of things, or 4) was personally meaningful.
Response options included 0 (not at all), 1 (to some extent), and 3 (to a great extent).
Respondents were also asked a more global question: How much did you feel your life had purpose today?
Th response scale ranged from 1 to 7 .
|
asked daily for 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days during week 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christina J Costa, PhD, Boston College
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Callahan CM, Unverzagt FW, Hui SL, Perkins AJ, Hendrie HC. Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research. Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007.
- Hwang JE. Promoting healthy lifestyles with aging: development and validation of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) using the Rasch measurement model. Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):786-95. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.09088.
- Heaven B, Brown LJ, White M, Errington L, Mathers JC, Moffatt S. Supporting well-being in retirement through meaningful social roles: systematic review of intervention studies. Milbank Q. 2013 Jun;91(2):222-87. doi: 10.1111/milq.12013.
- Fried LP, Carlson MC, Freedman M, Frick KD, Glass TA, Hill J, McGill S, Rebok GW, Seeman T, Tielsch J, Wasik BA, Zeger S. A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health. 2004 Mar;81(1):64-78. doi: 10.1093/jurban/jth094.
- Fried LP, Carlson MC, McGill S, Seeman T, Xue QL, Frick K, Tan E, Tanner EK, Barron J, Frangakis C, Piferi R, Martinez I, Gruenewald T, Martin BK, Berry-Vaughn L, Stewart J, Dickersin K, Willging PR, Rebok GW. Experience Corps: a dual trial to promote the health of older adults and children's academic success. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 13.
- Jenkinson CE, Dickens AP, Jones K, Thompson-Coon J, Taylor RS, Rogers M, Bambra CL, Lang I, Richards SH. Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 23;13:773. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-773.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-003
- P30AG048785 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sedentary Lifestyle
-
NCT05264155CompletedLifestyle | Lifestyle, Healthy | Lifestyle Risk Reduction | Lifestyle, Sedentary
-
NCT03473145CompletedSedentary Lifestyle
-
NCT03993652CompletedSedentary Lifestyle | Sedentary Behavior | Diet Habit
-
NCT04662307RecruitingLifestyle, Sedentary
-
NCT02994134CompletedSedentary Lifestyle
-
NCT02553980Completed
-
NCT04003324CompletedSedentary Lifestyle
Clinical Trials on Technology-assisted self-monitoring
-
NCT01999244CompletedObesity | Overweight
-
NCT02276742CompletedObesity | Type 2 Diabetes | Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
-
NCT01325376Unknown
-
NCT05012449Active, not recruiting
-
NCT04373239CompletedAssisted Reproductive Techniques
-
NCT06726603Completed
-
NCT04508114Unknown
-
NCT01373489Completed