MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation (MANIaC-PVC)

October 17, 2020 updated by: Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD, Centro Medico Teknon

MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation Procedures (MANIaC-PVC Study). A Randomized, Multicenter Study

Current navigation systems incorporate algorithms for automatic identification of local activation time (LAT). However, data about their utility and accuracy in premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures are scarce. This prospective, randomized study analyzes the accuracy and effectivity of an algorithmic method based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram within the window demarcated by the bipolar electrogram, compared with conventional, manual annotation during PVC ablation procedures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled and international multicenter study. The investigators aim to analyze the accuracy of LAT annotation using a novel algorithmic method (Wavefront, CARTO, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, USA) (WF), based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram (U-EGM) within the window demarcated by the B-EGM, by comparison with conventional, manual annotation in a multicenter cohort of patients referred for PVC ablation. Further on, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC. The investigators hypothesize that automatic LAT annotation (using WF and the ECG recognition algorithm) could be superior to conventional, manual annotation in terms of mapping success and could reduce both procedure time and radiofrequency time.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08022
        • Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years.
  • Indication for PVC ablation.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years.
  • Pregnancy.
  • PVC ablation procedures guided by pace-mapping (PASO® module); eg. low burden of PVCs during the study, mechanical impact during activation mapping.
  • Impossibility to perform activation mapping with the required density of points in the region of interest (see section 4.5.3).
  • Concomitant investigation treatments.
  • Medical, geographical and social factors that make study participation impractical, and inability to give written informed consent. Patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Automatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)
The annotation of LAT in each acquired point will be automatically performed using the LAT annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system, called Wavefront (WF). Automatic annotation of LAT performed by the CARTO system uses the maximum negative slope of the distal U-EGM to set the timing of the mapping annotation, displayed on the corresponding B-EGM. Additionally, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC.
Device: Automatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)
Automatic annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be automatically performed using the Wavefront (WF) annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system.
Other Names:
  • Wavefront
Active Comparator: Manual annotation of LAT (M-method)
A detailed electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated activation map of the chamber of interest will be acquired using the CARTO navigation system. An experienced electrophysiologist will perform the annotation of LAT in each acquired point. The LAT will be measured from the onset of B-EGM (earliest positive or negative deflection) of the distal dipole of the mapping catheter to the defined reference. The use of the U-EGM as a guidance to identify the real onset of B-EGM will be decided under electrophysiologist criteria.
Device: Manual annotation of LAT (M-method)
Conventional, manual annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be performed using the CARTO navigation system by an expert electrophysiologist.
Other Names:
  • Manual

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of mapping success, using the assigned mapping approach (automatic vs. manual), as defined in description
Time Frame: 12 months
Mapping success will be defined as complete PVC abolition after RF applications at the earliest activation site (EAS) identified using the assigned mapping approach. A maximum of 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters (contact force, impedance drop, catheter stability) during a maximum of 45 seconds will be allowed. If the PVC is not abolished after 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters, mapping will not be considered successful.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mapping time
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of mapped chambers
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Accuracy of a proposed algorithm for selection of first chamber to map
Time Frame: 12 months
In the case of PVCs arising from ventricular outflow tracts, we propose an algorithm to avoid subjective criteria, and to deal with eventual wrong selection of the first mapped chamber, leading to unnecessary RF applications. This algorithm involves a step-by-step analysis of the PVC-ECG morphology: precordial R/S transition and presence of one or more of the following clinical items, which have been previously related with a left origin: male gender, hypertension, or age > 50 years.
12 months
Number of target points
Time Frame: 12 months
Target point is defined as any suspected PVC-site of origin where RF is delivered according to mapping data. Therefore, for one case there can be found a single target point with multiple RF applications, or multiple target points with one single RF application. The maximum distance between 2 RF applications to be considered at the same target point will be defined as 5 mm (equivalent to a 1-cm2 area).
12 months
Radiofrequency (RF) time
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of RF applications
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Acute procedure success
Time Frame: 12 months
Complete elimination of the PVC at the end of the procedure.
12 months
Clinical success
Time Frame: 1 month
Reduction of, at least, 80% in the 24-hour PVC burden 1 month after the procedure.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centro Medico Teknon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Berruezo, MD, PhD, Centro Médico Teknon
  • Principal Investigator: Felipe Bisbal, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitari German Trias i Pujol (Badalona, Spain)
  • Principal Investigator: Alonso Pedrote, MD, PhD, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital (Sevilla, Spain)
  • Principal Investigator: Diego Penela, MD, PhD, Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto (Piacenza, Italy)
  • Principal Investigator: Juan Fernández-Armenta, MD, PhD, Puerta del Mar University Hospital (Cadiz, Spain)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Wavefront

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventricular Premature Complexes

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings