Differential Mechanisms of Dyspnea Relief in Advanced COPD: Opiates vs. Bronchodilators

April 1, 2024 updated by: Dr. Denis O'Donnell
Activity-related breathlessness (dyspnea) is the dominant symptom and persists despite optimal medical care in as many as 50% of patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The objective of this project is to determine the underlying mechanisms of the activity-related breathlessness in patients with advanced COPD. To study the different pathways involved in causing breathlessness, we will compare the effects of two treatments, opiates with oxygen versus bronchodilators, which relieve breathlessness in different ways.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dyspnea arises during exercise in COPD patients when there is a mismatch between the ventilatory demand (largely dictated by chemical stimuli) and the capacity to respond to that demand (dictated by mechanical/muscular factors). Our preliminary studies have indicated that treatment with opioids in COPD patients can improve activity related dyspnea by reducing central respiratory neural drive and breathing frequency without a significant change in the respiratory mechanics. By contrast, a reduction in exertional dyspnea following inhaled bronchodilators in COPD was mainly related to an improved respiratory mechanics with increased inspiratory capacity, tidal volume, and inspiratory reserve volume etcetera. By comparing the physiological mechanisms of dyspnea relief during the opiate and bronchodilator therapy, we hope to gain new insights into the mechanisms of dyspnea in COPD by selectively manipulating inspiratory neural drive (nebulized opiates) and abnormal respiratory mechanics (nebulized bronchodilators) within the same individuals. As such, the primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of inhaled opiate with oxygen versus bronchodilator treatments on the intensity of dyspnea, electromyographic estimates of inspiratory neural drive and respiratory mechanics and their interactions during a standardized exercise test using a randomized, controlled, crossover design in patients with COPD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Respiratory Investigation Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 30-79% predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) <70%
  2. Clinically stable as defined by no changes in medication dosage or frequency of administration with no exacerbations or hospital admissions in the preceding 6 weeks
  3. Male or female ≥40 yrs of age
  4. Cigarette smoking history ≥20 pack-years
  5. Moderate-to-severe chronic activity-related dyspnea as defined by a modified MRC dyspnea scale ≥2, COPD Assessment Test score ≥10 or Baseline Dyspnea Index focal score ≤6 (47-49)
  6. Ability to perform all study procedures and provide/sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women of childbearing age who are pregnant or trying to become pregnant
  2. Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) value of <40 %predicted
  3. Active cardiopulmonary disease other than COPD that could contribute to dyspnea and exercise limitation
  4. History/clinical evidence of asthma, atopy and/or nasal polyps
  5. History of hypercapnic respiratory failure or a clinical diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing
  6. History of allergy or adverse response to fentanyl
  7. Important contraindications to clinical exercise testing, including inability to exercise because of neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disease(s)
  8. Use of daytime oxygen or exercise-induced O2 desaturation to < 80% on room air
  9. Body mass index (BMI) <18.5 or ≥35.0 kg/m2
  10. Use of antidepressant drugs (i.e., monoamine oxidase inhibitors, serotonin reuptake inhibitors) in previous 2 weeks
  11. Use of opioid drugs (e.g., morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, codeine, etc.) in the previous 4 weeks.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Fentanyl Citrate
Single dose, nebulized 100 mcg fentanyl citrate. This is a randomized, double-blind, two-treatment crossover study comparing the effects of a single dose of nebulized 100 mcg fentanyl citrate with a constant fraction of 30% inhaled oxygen to that of a nebulized bronchodilator (Combivent). Treatments will be in randomized order: patients in one study arm will receive fentanyl at the first treatment visit and combivent at the second treatment visit, patients in the other arm will receive Combivent first and fentanyl second.
Drug: Fentanyl Citrate
100 mcg fentanyl citrate will be inhaled via nebulizer
Other Names:
  • Inhaled fentanyl
Active Comparator: Combivent Bronchodilator
Single dose, nebulized Combivent bronchodilator (0.5 mg ipratropium bromide + 2.5 mg salbutamol). This is a randomized, double-blind, two-treatment crossover study comparing the effects of a single dose of nebulized 100 mcg fentanyl citrate with a constant fraction of 30% inhaled oxygen to that of a nebulized bronchodilator (Combivent). Treatments will be in randomized order: patients in one study arm will receive fentanyl at the first treatment visit and combivent at the second treatment visit, patients in the other arm will receive Combivent first and fentanyl second.
Drug: Combivent
0.5 mg ipratropium bromide + 2.5 mg salbutamol will be inhaled via nebulizer
Other Names:
  • Bronchodilator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea intensity measured by the 10-point Borg Scale at a standardized time during cycle exercise test
Time Frame: 10-minutes post-treatment
The 10-point Borg scale ranges from 0 "nothing at all" to 10 "maximal/extremely strong" and will be used to rate the intensity of dyspnea during exercise: a decrease in this rating signifies an improvement. Dyspnea intensity will be assessed at a standardized time (4-minutes) in both post-treatment constant-load cycle exercise tests.
10-minutes post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diaphragm electromyography (EMGdi) at a standardized time during cycle exercise test
Time Frame: 10-minutes post-treatment
EMGdi will be used as an index of inspiratory neural drive. Assessments will be compared at a standardized time (4-minutes) during both post-treatment constant-load cycle exercise tests.
10-minutes post-treatment
Ventilation at a standardized time during cycle exercise test
Time Frame: 10-minutes post-treatment
Exercise measurements of minute ventilation will be compared at a standardized time (4-minutes) during both post-treatment constant-load exercise tests.
10-minutes post-treatment
Breathing frequency at a standardized time during cycle exercise test
Time Frame: 10-minutes post-treatment
Exercise measurements of breathing frequency (respiratory rate) will be compared at a standardized time (4-minutes) during both post-treatment constant-load exercise tests.
10-minutes post-treatment
Tidal volume at a standardized time during cycle exercise test
Time Frame: 10-minutes post-treatment
Exercise measurements of tidal volume will be compared at a standardized time (4-minutes) during both post-treatment constant-load cycle exercise tests.
10-minutes post-treatment
Inspiratory capacity at a standardized time during cycle exercise test
Time Frame: 10-minutes post-treatment
Exercise measurements of inspiratory capacity will be compared at a standardized time (4-minutes) during both post-treatment constant-load cycle exercise tests.
10-minutes post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dr. Denis O'Donnell

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Queen's University
Ontario Lung Association

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Denis E O'Donnell, MD, FRCPC, Queen's University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DMED-1926-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Fentanyl Citrate

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings