Non Surgical Protocol for Treatment of Peri-implantitis

December 21, 2025 updated by: Marco Clementini, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Evaluation of the Adjunctive Use of Er:YAG Laser or Erythritol Air-polishing in the Non-surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis: a RCT

Peri-implantitis is an important disease entity as a result of its high prevalence and the lack of a standard mode of therapy.

Non-surgical therapy of peri-implant disease, especially when bone loss is not high, appears to be partially effective in resolving the disease. In several cases, however, only limited improvements have been reported in the main clinical parameters (bleeding at the survey and presence of the pocket) and there is a clear tendency to relapse of the disease.

In these cases it is therefore recommended to consider adjunctive therapies. Numerous approaches have been used for implant surface decontamination including mechanical, chemical and treatments by means of air-powder or laser.

The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial will be to assess the efficacy in improving clinical parameters of two further methods of implant surface decontamination (Er:YAG laser or air-abrasive device) after mechanical cleaning during non surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Peri-implantitis, defined as an inflammatory lesion in the surrounding peri-implant tissues with loss of supporting bone, is an important disease entity as a result of its high prevalence and the lack of a standard mode of therapy. Although the current epidemiological data are limited, peri-implantitis affects 28-56% of the subjects and 12-43% of the implants.

Numerous approaches have been used for implant surface decontamination during peri-implant surgery, including mechanical, chemical and laser treatments. Using conventional mechanical means, eradication of pathogens on implant surfaces with threads and often with rough surface structures is difficult. Treatment models, such as debridment, effectively used to treat teeth with periodontitis, cannot be used in the same way on rough threaded implant surfaces. The implant rough surface structure also provides the bacteria with ''protected areas'', inaccessible to conventional mechanical removal.

A treatment protocol that may offer an advantage over traditional mechanical treatment includes the use of laser therapy. Data have shown that treatments with Er:YAG lasers have a bactericidal effect. Er:YAG laser treatment can debride the implant surface effectively and safely. Slightly better clinical results in terms of bleeding on probing and clinical attachment level have been reported by Er:YAG laser treatment as compared with traditional non-surgical mechanical debridement with curette and chlorhexidine.

The air abrasive method for the removal of bacterial plaque on tooth surfaces has also been used in the treatment of peri-implantitis, demonstrating no relevant adverse effects. Until recently, air-polishing devices have used a slurry of water and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and pressurized air/water. A less abrasive method using an amino acid glycine has been proven to be effective in removing bacterial biofilm structures in deep periodontal pockets and safe by not causing emphysema. Moreover the use of a glycine-based powder does not seem to cause titanium implant surface changes.

The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial will be to assess the efficacy in improving clinical parameters of two further methods of implant surface decontamination (Er:YAG laser or air-abrasive device) after mechanical cleaning during non surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Milano
      • Milan, Milano, Italy, 20100
        • Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of at least one screw-type titanium implant exhibiting bleeding and/or suppuration on probing combined with:

    1. a PPD ≥ 5 mm and bone loss > 2 mm (compared to crestal bone levels at the time of placement of the reconstruction)
    2. a PPD ≥ 6 mm and bone loss ≥ 3 mm (not compared to crestal bone levels at the time of placement of the reconstruction)
  • single tooth and bridgework restorations without overhangings
  • no evidence of occlusal overload (i.e. occlusal contacts revealed appropriate adjustment)
  • implant function time ≥ 1 year.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes,
  • patients with osteoporosis or under bisphosphonate medication,
  • pregnant or lactating women,
  • patients with a history of radiotherapy to the head and neck region
  • patients with incapability to perform basal oral hygiene measures due to physical or mental disorders
  • hollow implants
  • implant mobility
  • implants at which no position could be identified where proper probing measurements could be performed;
  • previous surgical treatment of the peri-implantitis lesions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Er:YAG laser
Er:YAG laser treatment will be provided on the implant surface.
mechanical debridement: Inflammatory tissue, excess cement or plaque deposits will be removed using hand instruments (titanium curettes) and the implant surface will be cleaned
Other Names:
  • titanium curettes
mechanical debridement: Inflammatory tissue, excess cement or plaque deposits will be removed using hand instruments (titanium curettes) and the implant surface will be cleaned. Furthermore, Er:YAG laser treatment will be provided on the implant surface.
Active Comparator: Air Powder
an Air-Powder treatment will be provided on the implant surface.
mechanical debridement: Inflammatory tissue, excess cement or plaque deposits will be removed using hand instruments (titanium curettes) and the implant surface will be cleaned
Other Names:
  • titanium curettes
mechanical debridement: Inflammatory tissue, excess cement or plaque deposits will be removed using hand instruments (titanium curettes) and the implant surface will be cleaned. Furthermore, an Air-Powder treatment will be provided on the implant surface.
Sham Comparator: Mechanical instrumentation with curettes
mechanical instrumentation: Inflammatory tissue, excess cement or plaque deposits will be removed using hand instruments (titanium curettes) and the implant surface will be cleaned.
mechanical debridement: Inflammatory tissue, excess cement or plaque deposits will be removed using hand instruments (titanium curettes) and the implant surface will be cleaned
Other Names:
  • titanium curettes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
probing pocket depth changes
Time Frame: baseline, 1, 3, 6 months
changes in probing pocket depth, measured from the mucosal margin to the bottom of the pocket
baseline, 1, 3, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding on probing changes
Time Frame: baseline,1, 3, 6 months
changes of bleeding on probing, evaluated as present if bleeding will be evident within 30 s after probing, or absent, if no bleeding will be noticed within 30 s after probing
baseline,1, 3, 6 months
endpoint of therapy
Time Frame: 1,3,6 months
residual PPD ≤5 mm with BoP present at no more than one site and no SoP (Tonetti et al., 2023), assessed at the implant level.
1,3,6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Massimo De Sanctis, Prof., University Vita Salute San Raffaele

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • peri-implant non surgical-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis

Clinical Trials on mechanical instrumentation

Search Similar Trials