Bronchoscopic Laser Ablation of Peripheral Lung Tumors

January 19, 2023 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Bronchoscopic Laser Ablation of Solid Peripheral Lung Tumors Followed by Surgical Resection (BLAST-SR Trial)

As our population ages and we diagnose early lung cancer in patients who cannot undergo surgery due to multiple medical conditions, there is growing interest in minimally invasive modalities to treat these tumors. In this study we are assessing the ability of bronchoscopic laser ablation to kill the cancer cells in these tumors. Patients will undergo bronchoscopy (a tube-like instrument inserted through the mouth to view the inside of the trachea, air passages, and lungs). A thin catheter will be passed through the wind-pipes and into the lung tumor with computed tomography guidance. A laser probe is then passed through this catheter and it is used to destroy the tumor with heat. Patients will then undergo lung surgery with resection of the tumor, and the resected specimen will be reviewed to describe the amount of tumor-kill produced by the laser.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the pathologic changes that result from bronchoscopic laser ablation of peripheral lung tumors focusing on the proportion of complete tumor ablation.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the safety of this technique by describing both procedure-related complications such as bleeding or pneumothorax and post-procedure adverse effects such as fever or pneumonitis.

II. To assess the pathologic changes observed in the lung tissue surrounding the treated lung tumor.

III. To assess radiographic changes observed by cone-beam computed tomography (CT) immediately after the application of bronchoscopic laser ablation.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo bronchoscopic laser ablation following standard bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound. Patients also undergo CBCT before and after laser ablation. 48-72 hours after the procedure, patients undergo standard surgical resection of the lung tumor.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Performance status 0-2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification)
  • Subject is considered a candidate for bronchoscopy
  • Subject is considered a candidate for surgery (other lobar or sub-lobar resection) based on radiographic staging and functional evaluation
  • Lung lesion that is either biopsy-proven cancer or is suspicious for cancer
  • Both non-small cell lung cancer (including carcinoid tumors) and metastatic disease
  • The lesions should be: =< 3 cm, located in the outer 2/3 of the lung, and leave >= 1 cm of tumor-free lung parenchyma between target tumor and pleura or fissure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumors greater than 3 cm, located in the inner 1/3 of the lung, invading a major vessel, or located < 1 cm from the pleural or fissure
  • Tumors qualified as non-resectable
  • Tumors that cannot be reached bronchoscopically
  • Patients declared non-surgical candidates
  • Patients who are not candidates for bronchoscopy
  • Patients with lung cancer who are found to have N2-3 disease
  • Patient with lung metastases who are found to have any malignant mediastinal lymph node
  • Patients in which the target lesion is confirmed as benign or small cell lung cancer
  • Patients without a prior diagnosis of the target lesion whose diagnosis cannot be made during bronchoscopy
  • Patients who have received chemotherapy within 60 days prior to bronchoscopic laser ablation
  • Patients who were previously treated for the target lesion
  • Pregnant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Diagnostic (bronchoscopic laser ablation, CBCT)
Patients undergo bronchoscopic laser ablation following standard bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound. Patients also undergo CBCT before and after laser ablation. 48-72 hours after the procedure, patients undergo standard surgical resection of the lung tumor.
Procedure: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Undergo CBCT
Other Names:
  • Cone Beam CT
Procedure: Conventional Surgery
Undergo standard resection
Procedure: Laser Ablation
Undergo bronchoscopic laser ablation
Other Names:
  • ABLATION, LASER
  • Photoablation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathologic Changes From Bronchoscopic Laser Ablation of Peripheral Lung Tumors
Time Frame: Up to 16 months
Pathologic changes will be categorized into three groups: 1. Complete Ablation: absence of staining (anti-mitochondria antibody [MAB] 1273 or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-hydrogen [NADH], or both) of tumor cells. 2. Quasi-Complete Ablation: positive staining of 10% of tumor cells. 3. Incomplete ablation: positive staining in > 10% of tumor cells. Will conduct extensive descriptive analyses of the data collected. Will calculate the appropriate summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the measures of interest.
Up to 16 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Will be graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Will be measured by serious adverse effects (SAE), defined as pneumothorax requiring chest tube, bleeding requiring balloon tamponade or leading to respiratory failure, and hypoxemia during bronchoscopy, post-bronchoscopy pneumonitis with need of supplemental oxygen.
Up to 2 years
Pathologic changes observed in the lung tissue surrounding the treated lung tumor
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Will conduct extensive descriptive analyses of the data collected. Will calculate the appropriate summary statistics and 90% CIs for the measures of interest.
Up to 2 years
Radiographic changes observed by cone-beam computed tomography (CT)
Time Frame: At completion of bronchoscopic laser ablation
Will conduct extensive descriptive analyses of the data collected. Will calculate the appropriate summary statistics and 90% CIs for the measures of interest.
At completion of bronchoscopic laser ablation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018-0474 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2018-02133 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IVA Lung Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings