Computer Assisted Family Intervention to Treat Self-Harm Disparities in Latinas and Sexual/Gender Minority Youth

October 11, 2024 updated by: Victoria Mitrani, University of Miami

Computer Assisted Family Intervention to Treat Self- Harm Disparities in Latinas and Sexual/Gender Minority Youth (CA CIFFTA)

This study is designed to refine and test the efficacy of a computer assisted culturally informed and flexible/adaptive intervention for Latino adolescents for whom self-harm behaviors are a health disparity-specifically, Latinas and sexual/gender minority youth.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study enhances an original Computer Assisted Culturally Informed and Flexible Family-Based Treatment for Adolescents (CA CIFFTA) to directly address key targets related to self-harm behavior (e.g., depression, emotion dysregulation, LGBT, culture-related stressors, and trauma-related stressors); (b) refines the technological aspects of CA CIFFTA for web-based delivery; and (c) tests the preliminary efficacy of the new intervention and its delivery system in a randomized trial of 100 Hispanic adolescents and their parents. The investigators seek to reduce risk for repeated self-harm by showing treatment effects on depression, emotion regulation, substance use, and family functioning. Participants are randomly assigned to CA CIFFTA or Treatment-As-Usual and treatment covers a four month period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

172

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Maite Mena, Psy.D.
  • Phone Number: 305 284-8852
  • Email: mmena@miami.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33146
        • Institute for Individual and Family Counseling

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria. The adolescent must:

  • be 11 to 18 years old;
  • self-report an act of self-harm in the past 6 months,
  • meet criteria for cut-off on two of the four underlying/maintaining factors (depression, emotion dysregulation, family conflict, substance use), and
  • live with at least one parent-figure who agrees to participate in assessments and treatment Participants should be willing and able to participate fully in the protocol (e.g., to accept assignment to either condition, to provide sufficient locator information for follow-up, to allow their treatment sessions to be recorded for fidelity/process assessment and supervision).

Exclusion Criteria. Youth who:

  • have a history of DSM V Developmental Disorders, Elective Mutism, Organic Mental Disorders, Schizophrenia, Delusional Disorder, Psychotic Disorder, and Bipolar Affective Disorder.
  • are actively in crisis and reporting current ideation with a specific plan and with means to complete the plan.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computer Assisted CIFFTA
CA CIFFTA (Computer Assisted Culturally Informed and Flexible Family Based Treatment for Adolescents) consists of a hybrid intervention utilizing office-based CIFFTA and technology-delivered material. Over 16 weeks CIFFTA participants receive 45 minutes of face-to-face sessions plus approximately 45 minutes of web-based intervention per week. During the continuing care phase participants access website resources and receive targeted messages (e.g., handling family conflicts). CA CIFFTA will: 1) deliver psycho-educational modules (e.g., depression, emotion regulation), 2) collect diary-card information, and 3) provide additional resources. During videos parents and adolescents can report symptoms and information that is automatically transmitted to therapists and used in the next session
This is a hybrid intervention that includes individual work with the adolescent (e.g., Motivational Interviewing, diary card identification of triggers), computer assisted psychoeducational work, and intensive family therapy interventions.
Other Names:
  • Behavioral: Family Therapy
  • Behavioral: Individual Therapy
  • Behavioral: Technology delivered psycho-educational modules
Active Comparator: Behavioral: Traditional face-to-face treatment-no technology
Participants randomized to Treatment-As-Usual (TAU) work over a 16-week period with their community agency. They may receive individual or family treatment. The team coordinates with the TAU agencies to minimize the overlap of data collected. The team will refer out to service locations that are most convenient for the participant. A great deal of thought has gone into the selection of the Treatment as Usual condition. The investigators wanted to compare CA CIFFTA's ability to retain and bring about change in participants with what is typically done in the community. Although running an in-house comparison condition gives more control of the delivery of services and tracking of clients, it is difficult to know how that compared to the services that are typically provided in the community
Community agencies provide mostly individual counseling but may add some family involvement in treatment planning.
Other Names:
  • Behavioral: Family Therapy
  • Behavioral: Individual Therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) Suicide Ideation
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
The Columbia yields information on suicide ideation and Ideation with Intent. Youth were categorized as having or not having ideation and having or not having intent to suicide (yes/no). Endorsing any of these items as "yes" is a worse outcome. The number listed below is the number of participants that said "yes" to experiencing suicidal ideation in the last month.
Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Reported Self-harm Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
The Deliberate Self-harm Inventory Youth Version (DSHI-Y) documents self-harm behavior. The data collected focused on the number of participants who reported "yes" to having engaged in self-harm in the past 30 days.
Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
Emotional Dysregulation Measured by Emotion Regulation Scale -Short Form (DERS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale -Short form (DERS), is designed to assess emotional dysregulation using a 5-point Likert Scale. The total score is calculated from the sum of all items, with higher scores indicating greater problems with emotion regulation. Total summed scores can range from 18 - 90 but investigators report that average item score (1-5) rather than the sum so that is more easily interpretable in the 5 point Likert Scale.
Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
The Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
The PHQ-9 incorporates the DSM-IV depression diagnostic criteria with other leading major depressive symptoms into a brief self-report tool. Depression Severity: 0 - none, 1-4 minimal, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, 20-27 severe.
Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
Family Connectedness
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline
The Family Connectedness (FC) scale includes seven items assessing communication and the relationship between parents and youth. A composite score was obtained. Two items measured communication and five items measured connectedness. The five Items were scored on a 1-10 scale and summed to a total connectedness score. Minimum score = 5 and Maximum score = 50. Higher scores mean better connections.
Baseline, 4 months post baseline, 12 months post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Santisteban, Ph.D., University of Miami

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

August 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20170791
  • U54MD002266 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Computer Assisted CIFFTA

Search Similar Trials