Effects of Maintaining Steady Albumin Levels (TAT 4) on Survival and Liver Related Complications in Cirrhosis With Ascites

September 11, 2019 updated by: Shasthry SM, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Effects of Maintaining Steady Albumin Levels by Targeted Albumin Therapy (TAT 4) on Survival and Liver Related Complications in Cirrhosis With Ascites and Low Serum Albumin Level- a Randomized Controlled Trial

Investigators intend to assess the utility of regular albumin infusions to maintain a targeted serum albumin level of 4.0 g/dl in newly detected cirrhotic patients with low albumin levels (<2.8g/dl) with ascites.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cirrhosis is characterized by progressive deterioration in liver functions. Liver's synthetic functions are inferred by serum albumin and INR estimation. Lower albumin level is a marker of severe liver disease and probability of worsening ascites, hepatorenal syndrome with increased risk for infections. Of the three recent RCTs on utility of long-term administration of albumin, two showed improvement in survival. The studies had included different patient populations (diuretic refractory ascites, high dose diuretics and patients on liver transplant waiting list) with different albumin infusion protocols and different end-points. These studies were done in advanced cases of cirrhosis. There is limited data on the utility of regular albumin infusions in early hepatic decompensation (albumin levels-<2.8g/dl with ascites) and the effect of maintaining a targeted albumin level on survival or liver related side effects. Investigators are trying to address this issue by starting regular albumin infusions at an earlier stage of liver decompensation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
304

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly detected cirrhotic patients aged more than 18 years
  • Cirrhosis defined by standard clinical, analytical and/or histological criteria
  • Serum albumin level < 2.8g/dl with or without ascites
  • Who would agree to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Uncontrolled HTN (sys>150/ dis >90 mmHg) or h/o any drug therapy for HTN
  • Prior h/o Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Active alcohol abuse within 3 months
  • Patients presenting as Acute on Chronic Liver Failure
  • Extrahepatic organ failure
  • Known case of chronic heart failure or respiratory failure
  • Diagnosed Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Patients with hydrothorax
  • Prior liver transplant recipient
  • Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection
  • Use of albumin infusion in the last one month
  • CTP>12, MELD>28
  • Total Bilirubin >3 g/dl
  • Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy at Presentation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Other: placebo
placebo
Experimental: Albumin
Albumin infusions will be given at a dose of 40 g twice weekly till a steady albumin level of 4.0g/dl is reached followed by 100ml of 20% albumin at least once in two weeks to maintain a steady albumin level of 4.0g/dl along with the standard medical therapy
Drug: ALB Protein, Human
Albumin infusions will be given at a dose of 40 g twice weekly till a steady albumin level of 4.0g/dl is reached followed by 100ml of 20% albumin at least once in two weeks to maintain a steady albumin level of 4.0g/dl along with the standard medical therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transplant/Transintrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) free survival in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
1 year survival
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
New onset refractory ascites in both the groups
Time Frame: 12 months
refractory ascites is defined as non response to maximum tolerated dose of diuretics
12 months
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis [SBP] in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is defined as ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil count > 250/ mL with or without culture positivity
12 months
Renal impairment in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
serum creatinine concentration >1•5 mg/dL
12 months
Hepatorenal Syndrome in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Hepatorenal Syndrome type 1 is defined as new onset increase in serum creatinine level by 0.3 mg/dL or 50% increase from baseline
12 months
Hepatic encephalopathy grade 3 or 4 in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
HE as per West Haven criteria
12 months
Number of new cases with gastrointestinal bleeding in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
gastrointestinal bleeding as confirmed by endoscopic/clinical evidence of variceal bleed.
12 months
Requirement of paracentesis in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Ascitic tapping for relieve of pressure symptoms or diagnosis of SBP
12 months
Requirement of diuretics in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Frusemide or Aldactone for management of ascites
12 months
Number of hospitalizations per subject in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
Need for any cause hospitalization
12 months
New onset breathlessness/ Hypertension within 24 hours of albumin infusion in both groups
Time Frame: within 24 hours
Development of cardiac overload
within 24 hours
Quality of life by Ascite-Q questionnaire in both groups
Time Frame: 12 months
semiquantitative questionnaire to be answered by the participants
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 8, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ILBS-TAT4-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings