Nutrition, Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in End-Stage Renal Disease (SummerMRI)

November 6, 2024 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
By 2030 an estimated 2 million people in the US will need dialysis or transplantation. Insulin resistance and chronic inflammation are common in dialysis patients and have been linked to protein-energy wasting, the most important determinant of clinical outcome in this patient population. The investigators hypothesize that the skin and muscle tissue sodium accumulation is a critical mechanism by which chronic inflammatory response and insulin resistance, alone or in combination lead to protein energy wasting in hemodialysis patients. The investigators will test this hypothesis by studying dialysis patients and matched controls without kidney disease by examining tissue Na content, markers of inflammation and protein metabolism.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

There are more than 420,000 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis therapy in the United States, which is estimated to rise to over 500,000 patients by 2020. There are an estimated 45,500 Veterans receiving hemodialysis, of which over 3,000 enrolled Veterans were receiving dialysis at VA facilities in FY 2013. Over the last decade, there have been no therapies proven to significantly lower the mortality and morbidity risk for these patients. One of the most important determinants of this poor clinical outcome is protein energy wasting, a highly prevalent nutritional and metabolic abnormality characterized by increased protein breakdown in the skeletal muscle compartment. The investigators' group has shown that two well-recognized and interrelated metabolic abnormalities, insulin resistance and persistent inflammation, are likely to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of protein energy wasting and related nutritional and metabolic abnormalities. The investigators' preliminary data show that in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients 1) There is an inadequate response to protein anabolic actions of insulin; 2) Persistent systemic inflammation is strongly and independently associated with skeletal muscle net protein balance; and 3) Pharmacological modulation of systemic inflammation and insulin resistance partially, but not fully, reverse net protein catabolism. It was demonstrated that non-osmotic sodium (Na) is stored in skin and muscle without commensurate water retention, which leads to local immune-cell activation and accelerated pro-inflammatory status. The investigators' preliminary data show that the skin and muscle Na+ contents, derived by 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are substantially higher in MHD patients compared to matched healthy controls. The investigators also showed that increased skin and muscle Na concentrations are significantly associated with increased inflammatory response and decreased peripheral insulin sensitivity, in patients on MHD. These data suggest that tissue Na content, immune pathways and insulin resistance are closely linked and could lead to increased risk for protein energy wasting in MHD patients. It was reported that standard 4-hour conventional hemodialysis provides significant Na removal from muscle and skin suggesting that tissue Na and water content could be modulated by modulating hemodialysis prescription. The overall goal of this application is to elucidate the mechanisms by which tissue sodium accumulation, persistent immune system activation and insulin resistance influence the development of protein energy wasting in MHD patients. The investigators hypothesize that the skin and muscle tissue sodium accumulation is a critical mechanism by which chronic inflammatory response and insulin resistance, alone or in combination, lead to protein energy wasting in MHD patients. Specific Aims: To test the hypothesis that removal of tissue sodium by modulating hemodialysis prescription would improve metabolic milieu and protein energy wasting in MHD patients. The investigators will achieve this goal through a cross-over randomized clinical trial whereby dialysate sodium concentrations will be modulated (138 mEq/L versus 132 mEq/L, 4 weeks each) to remove 10% of baseline skeletal muscle Na content in the setting of stable sodium intake by diet. The primary outcomes will be markers of net protein balance, inflammation, and macronutrient disposal rates. If successful, the proposed studies will have great potential to influence clinical practices in MHD patients because the proposed intervention protocol would be easily accessible and could ultimately lead to improvements in the hospitalization and death rates with great impact on Veterans' Health Care and make important contributions to the research mission of the Department of Veterans Administration.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212-2637
        • Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • On MHD for more than 6 months
  • Have acceptable dialysis adequacy (eKt/V > 1.2) for a minimum of 3 months and a patent, well-functioning, hemodialysis AV access
  • Ability to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Intolerance to the medication in metabolic studies)
  • Presence of a metal object in the body that might interfere with MRI
  • Severe, unstable, active, or chronic inflammatory disease (active infection, active connective tissue disorder, active cancer or cancer history in the prior 5 years, HIV, liver disease, active chronic hepatitis B or C)
  • Type 1 Diabetes on insulin therapy; Hospitalization within 1 month prior to the study
  • Receiving steroids (including inhaled steroid and high potency topical, with the exception of over the counter hydrocortisone cream
  • Prednisone > 5 mg/day) and/or other immunosuppressive agents
  • Residual renal function > 5ml/min or urine output > 400 ml/day

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High Dialysate Na
high dialysate sodium concentration (138 mEq/L)
Other: high dialysate sodium concentration (138 mEq/L)
high dialysate sodium concentration (138 mEq/L)
Active Comparator: Low Dialysate Na
Low dialysate sodium concentration (132 mEq/L)
Other: Low dialysate sodium concentration
low dialysate sodium concentration (132 mEq/L)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Net whole-body muscle protein balance measured by stable isotope technique reported as mg/kg.fat free mass/min
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Net whole-body muscle protein balance measured by stable isotope technique reported as mg/kg.fat free mass/min. This reflects the balance between endogenous leucine appearance rate (protein synthesis), the leucine oxidation rate, and the non-oxidative leucine disappearance rate (protein breakdown).
4 weeks
Net skeletal muscle protein balance measured by stable isotope technique reported as g/100 ml/min
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Net skeletal muscle protein balance measured by stable isotope technique reported as g/100 ml/min. This reflects the dilution and enrichment of phenylalanine across the forearm. Because phenylalanine is neither synthesized nor metabolized by skeletal muscle, rate of appearance (Ra) of unlabeled phenylalanine reflects muscle protein breakdown, whereas the rate of disappearance (Rd) of labeled phenylalanine estimates muscle protein synthesis. the difference between synthesis and breakdown provides net skeletal muscle protein balance at a given rate of blood flow.
4 weeks
Muscle sodium content
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Muscle sodoium content measured by NAMRI before and after intervention
4 weeks
Skin sodium content
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Skin sodium content measured by NAMRI before and after intervention
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Handgrip strength measured by dynamometer
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Handgrip strength (HGS) will be measured on the non stula side before dialysis session using a Jamar hydraulic dynamometer.
4 weeks
Recovery time
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Patients will be asked how long it took them to recover completely from the preceding session
4 weeks
Pulse Wave Velocity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Pulse Wave Velocity will be measured by Sphygmocor.
4 weeks
Interleukin 6
Time Frame: 4 weeks
proinflammatory cytokine IL6 will be measured as a inflammatory marker
4 weeks
Sit to stand test
Time Frame: 4 weeks
measurement of how many sit to stands can be accomplished at a given time period to assess physical function
4 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Balance, gait speed and chair speed tests will be scored to provide a complete score to assess physical function
4 weeks
6-minute walk
Time Frame: 4 weeks
measurement of how long can a patient walk within 6 minutes to assess physical function
4 weeks
hsCRP
Time Frame: 4 weeks
hsCRP will be measured as a marker of systemic inflammation
4 weeks
Interleukin 1
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Proinflammatory cytokine Interleukin 1 (IL1) will be measured as a inflammatory marker
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Talat A Ikizler, MD, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Nashville Campus, Nashville, TN

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 6, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NEPH-010-18F

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End-stage Renal Disease

Clinical Trials on high dialysate sodium concentration (138 mEq/L)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings