CHESS Criteria for Varices Screening in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2001/APPHA2001)

April 23, 2023 updated by: Xiaolong Qi, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Development and Validation of CHESS Criteria for the Screening of Varices in Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2001/APPHA2001)

Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices in cACLD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. Once identified with medium-large varices, or small varices with red signs or Child-Pugh C class, defined as varices needing treatment (VNT), the patients with cACLD are recommended to receive the non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation per Baveno VI consensus. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria, which was validated by 310 patients dominant with hepatitis C virus (55.0%), recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) < 20kPa and platelet count > 150×10^9 cells/L. Furthermore, the expanded-Baveno VI criteria (LS < 25kPa and platelet count > 110×10^9 cells/L), based on European cohort with hepatitis C virus (62.8%), was able to spare more unnecessary endoscopies than the Baveno VI criteria with VNT missed rate < 5%. Nevertheless, a recent Asian-pacific study indicated that though Baveno VI criteria was able to avoid screening endoscopy with 27.6%, it increased the odds of missing VNT in hepatitis B virus-related cACLD. Notably, this study also suggested that the expanded-Baveno VI criteria was not suited for Asian-pacific cohort with hepatitis B virus as the dominant cause with VNT missed rate > 5%. Our study aims to develop and validate an optimal cutoff value of LS and platelet count (CHESS criteria) to safely avoid more unnecessary endoscopies in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominated cACLD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices in cACLD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. Once identified with medium-large varices, or small varices with red signs or Child-Pugh C class, defined as varices needing treatment (VNT), the patients with cACLD are recommended to receive the non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation per Baveno VI consensus. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria, which was validated by 310 patients dominant with hepatitis C virus (55.0%), recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) < 20kPa and platelet count > 150×10^9 cells/L. Furthermore, the expanded-Baveno VI criteria (LS < 25kPa and platelet count > 110×10^9 cells/L), based on European cohort with hepatitis C virus (62.8%), was able to spare more unnecessary endoscopies than the Baveno VI criteria (40.0% vs 21.5%, p < 0.001) with VNT missed rate < 5%. Nevertheless, a recent Asian-pacific study indicated that though Baveno VI criteria was able to avoid screening endoscopy with 27.6%, it increased the odds of missing VNT in hepatitis B virus-related cACLD. Notably, this study also suggested that the expanded-Baveno VI criteria was not suited for Asian-pacific cohort with hepatitis B virus as the dominant cause with VNT missed rate > 5%. Our study aims to develop and validate an optimal cutoff value of LS and platelet count (CHESS criteria) to safely avoid more unnecessary endoscopies in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominated cACLD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Chuan Liu, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +8615626415443 +8615626415443
  • Email: 845424585@qq.com

Study Locations

  • China
      • Ankang, China
        • Ankang Central Hospital
      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital
      • Beijing, China
        • The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital
      • Dalian, China
        • Dalian Sixth People's Hospital
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Zhujiang Hospital
      • Lanzhou, China
        • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
      • Lishui, China
        • The Central Hospital of Lishui City
      • Nanning, China
        • Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Tongji Hospital
      • Shenyang, China
        • Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
      • Tianjin, China
        • Tianjin Second People's Hospital
      • Xingtai, China
        • Xingtai People's Hospital
      • Zhejiang, China
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
      • Zhenjiang, China
        • The Affiliated Third Hospital of Jiangsu University
      • Zhuhai, China
        • The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with compensated advanced chronic liver disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-75 years;
  • confirmed cirrhosis based on liver biopsy or clinical findings;
  • without decompensated events (e.g. ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy);
  • scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and liver stiffness measurement;
  • estimated survival time>24 months, and model for end-stage liver disease score<19, and without liver transplant;
  • with written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contradictions for esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
  • accepted primary prevention (non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation);
  • Child-Pugh score>9;
  • time frame between liver stiffness and esophagogastroduodenoscopy>14 days;
  • diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma or other hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies;
  • splenectomy or hepatectomy;
  • portal vein thrombosis or cavernous transformation of portal vein;
  • pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Overall eligible participants
Eligible participants will receive standard esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, liver stiffness measurement and serological examination (platelet count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, Prothrombin time, albumin).
Procedure: Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, liver stiffness measurement
Time frame between liver stiffness measurement and esophagogastroduodendoscopy is less than 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of CHESS criteria
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of Chinese Portal Hypertension Diagnosis and Monitoring Study Group (CHESS) criteria (optimal cutoff value of liver stiffness and platelet count) to avoid unnecessary endoscopies in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of LSPS model
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of LSPS model (liver stiffness * spleen diameter to platelet counts) for high-risk varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
LanZhou University
Zhujiang Hospital
The Central Hospital of Lishui City
Xingtai People's Hospital
Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine
Ankang Central Hospital
Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital
The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College
Tianjin Second People's Hospital
Seventh Medical Center of PLA Army General Hospital
The Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Dalian Sixth People's Hospital
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University
The Affiliated Third Hospital of Jiangsu University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHESS2001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, liver stiffness measurement

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings