CHESS Criteria for Varices Screening in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2001/APPHA2001)

April 23, 2023 updated by: Xiaolong Qi, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province

Development and Validation of CHESS Criteria for the Screening of Varices in Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2001/APPHA2001)

Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices in cACLD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. Once identified with medium-large varices, or small varices with red signs or Child-Pugh C class, defined as varices needing treatment (VNT), the patients with cACLD are recommended to receive the non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation per Baveno VI consensus. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria, which was validated by 310 patients dominant with hepatitis C virus (55.0%), recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) < 20kPa and platelet count > 150×10^9 cells/L. Furthermore, the expanded-Baveno VI criteria (LS < 25kPa and platelet count > 110×10^9 cells/L), based on European cohort with hepatitis C virus (62.8%), was able to spare more unnecessary endoscopies than the Baveno VI criteria with VNT missed rate < 5%. Nevertheless, a recent Asian-pacific study indicated that though Baveno VI criteria was able to avoid screening endoscopy with 27.6%, it increased the odds of missing VNT in hepatitis B virus-related cACLD. Notably, this study also suggested that the expanded-Baveno VI criteria was not suited for Asian-pacific cohort with hepatitis B virus as the dominant cause with VNT missed rate > 5%. Our study aims to develop and validate an optimal cutoff value of LS and platelet count (CHESS criteria) to safely avoid more unnecessary endoscopies in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominated cACLD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices in cACLD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. Once identified with medium-large varices, or small varices with red signs or Child-Pugh C class, defined as varices needing treatment (VNT), the patients with cACLD are recommended to receive the non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation per Baveno VI consensus. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria, which was validated by 310 patients dominant with hepatitis C virus (55.0%), recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) < 20kPa and platelet count > 150×10^9 cells/L. Furthermore, the expanded-Baveno VI criteria (LS < 25kPa and platelet count > 110×10^9 cells/L), based on European cohort with hepatitis C virus (62.8%), was able to spare more unnecessary endoscopies than the Baveno VI criteria (40.0% vs 21.5%, p < 0.001) with VNT missed rate < 5%. Nevertheless, a recent Asian-pacific study indicated that though Baveno VI criteria was able to avoid screening endoscopy with 27.6%, it increased the odds of missing VNT in hepatitis B virus-related cACLD. Notably, this study also suggested that the expanded-Baveno VI criteria was not suited for Asian-pacific cohort with hepatitis B virus as the dominant cause with VNT missed rate > 5%. Our study aims to develop and validate an optimal cutoff value of LS and platelet count (CHESS criteria) to safely avoid more unnecessary endoscopies in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominated cACLD.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Chuan Liu, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +8615626415443 +8615626415443
  • Email: 845424585@qq.com

Study Locations

      • Ankang, China
        • Ankang Central Hospital
      • Beijing, China
        • Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital
      • Beijing, China
        • the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital
      • Dalian, China
        • Dalian Sixth People's Hospital
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Zhujiang Hospital
      • Lanzhou, China
        • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
      • Lishui, China
        • The Central Hospital of Lishui City
      • Nanning, China
        • Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Tongji Hospital
      • Shenyang, China
        • Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
      • Tianjin, China
        • Tianjin Second People's Hospital
      • Xingtai, China
        • Xingtai People's Hospital
      • Zhejiang, China
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
      • Zhenjiang, China
        • The Affiliated Third Hospital of Jiangsu University
      • Zhuhai, China
        • the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with compensated advanced chronic liver disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-75 years;
  • confirmed cirrhosis based on liver biopsy or clinical findings;
  • without decompensated events (e.g. ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy);
  • scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and liver stiffness measurement;
  • estimated survival time>24 months, and model for end-stage liver disease score<19, and without liver transplant;
  • with written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contradictions for esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
  • accepted primary prevention (non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation);
  • Child-Pugh score>9;
  • time frame between liver stiffness and esophagogastroduodenoscopy>14 days;
  • diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma or other hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies;
  • splenectomy or hepatectomy;
  • portal vein thrombosis or cavernous transformation of portal vein;
  • pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Overall eligible participants
Eligible participants will receive standard esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, liver stiffness measurement and serological examination (platelet count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, Prothrombin time, albumin).
Time frame between liver stiffness measurement and esophagogastroduodendoscopy is less than 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of CHESS criteria
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of Chinese Portal Hypertension Diagnosis and Monitoring Study Group (CHESS) criteria (optimal cutoff value of liver stiffness and platelet count) to avoid unnecessary endoscopies in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of LSPS model
Time Frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of LSPS model (liver stiffness * spleen diameter to platelet counts) for high-risk varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Clinical Trials on Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, liver stiffness measurement

3
Subscribe