One- Versus Two-Stage Aesthetic Crown Lengthening

May 26, 2020 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

One- Versus Two-Stage Aesthetic Crown Lengthening for Restorative Purposes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This randomized controlled trial was aimed at assessing the efficacy of a two-stage crown lengthening intervention (SCL) for restorative purposes in the aesthetic zone compared with a one-stage crown lengthening procedure (CCL).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects were randomly allocated to receive SCL or CCL. SCL consisted of full thickness flaps followed by bone recontouring and minor gingivectomy 4 months postoperatively, if required. In CCL, osseous recontouring after sub-marginal incisions was performed, followed by flap repositioning. Records were obtained at baseline, 4 months (only in SCL), 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome was the precision in achieving a predetermined gingival margin position. Other outcomes were changes in the gingival margin position and keratinized tissue width (KTW) at 12 months, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) using the OHIP-14 tool.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • older than eighteen years of age;
  • more than 20 teeth in the mouth;
  • with full mouth plaque and bleeding scores lower than 15%; and
  • without probing pocket depth and/or attachment loss >4 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women or breastfeeding
  • smokers
  • treated with antimicrobial and/or anti-inflammatory drugs within two months prior to entering the study
  • currently undergoing orthodontic therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Crown Lengthening; CCL
Using the surgical guide, submarginal internal bevel incisions were performed on the buccal aspect of the affected teeth. A full-thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction (Dominguez et al., 2020). Ostectomy and osteoplasty were carried out by means of rotatory instruments and surgical chisels, as necessary, to achieve the necessary space between the bone crest and the restorative margin according to the presurgical plan. The CEJ was not the reference point since, in many cases, the position of the final margin of the restoration was planned apical to the actual position of the CEJ. Exposed root surfaces were carefully instrumented manually with curettes and, finally, vertical internal mattress sutures were placed to position the gingival margin at the level of the margin of the planned restoration. Sutures were removed after 7 days.
Using the surgical guide, submarginal internal bevel incisions were performed on the buccal aspect of the affected teeth. A full-thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction (Dominguez et al., 2020). Ostectomy and osteoplasty were carried out by means of rotatory instruments and surgical chisels, as necessary, to achieve the necessary space between the bone crest and the restorative margin according to the presurgical plan. The CEJ was not the reference point since, in many cases, the position of the final margin of the restoration was planned apical to the actual position of the CEJ. Exposed root surfaces were carefully instrumented manually with curettes and, finally, vertical internal mattress sutures were placed to position the gingival margin at the level of the margin of the planned restoration. Sutures were removed after 7 days
Experimental: Two-stage Crown Lengthening (SCL)
In the first surgical intervention, intrasulcular incisions were performed and a full thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction. Ostectomy and osteoplasty were performed to establish the space for supracrestal tissue attachment, following the restorative plan and using the presurgical blueprint as the reference to determine the final position of the restoration margin, instead of the CEJ (Lee, 2004). Then the flaps were repositioned and secured with internal mattress sutures, placing the gingival margin at the original level. Sutures were removed at 7 days. In the second stage, after 3-4 months, minor gingival recontouring was performed, if necessary, to attain the desired gingival margin position according to the presurgical plan
In the first surgical intervention, intrasulcular incisions were performed and a full thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction. Ostectomy and osteoplasty were performed to establish the space for supracrestal tissue attachment, following the restorative plan and using the presurgical blueprint as the reference to determine the final position of the restoration margin, instead of the CEJ (Lee, 2004). Then the flaps were repositioned and secured with internal mattress sutures, placing the gingival margin at the original level. Sutures were removed at 7 days. In the second stage, after 3-4 months, minor gingival recontouring was performed, if necessary, to attain the desired gingival margin position according to the presurgical plan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
T1-T4
Time Frame: Baseline-12 months
The difference in mm between the ideal gingival margin (T1) and the position of the gingival margin at 12 months (T4).
Baseline-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Crown Length
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Distance from the gingival margin to the incisal edge on the midbuccal.Measured in mm.
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Amount of keratinized tissue
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Distance from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction on the midbuccal.Measured in mm.
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Gingival display upon smiling
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Distance from the gingival margin of the central incisors to the lower edge of the upper lip. Measured in mm.
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Supracrestal tissue dimension
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
Distance from the gingival margin to the alveolar bone crest (GM-ABC) as determined by bone sounding following local anesthesia. Measured in mm.
At baseline, 6- and 12-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Crown Lengthening RCT

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patients in Need of Surgical CL in the Anterior Maxillary Sextant for Restorative Purposes

Clinical Trials on Conventional Crown Lengthening (CCL)

Search Similar Trials