One- Versus Two-Stage Aesthetic Crown Lengthening
One- Versus Two-Stage Aesthetic Crown Lengthening for Restorative Purposes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- older than eighteen years of age;
- more than 20 teeth in the mouth;
- with full mouth plaque and bleeding scores lower than 15%; and
- without probing pocket depth and/or attachment loss >4 mm
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women or breastfeeding
- smokers
- treated with antimicrobial and/or anti-inflammatory drugs within two months prior to entering the study
- currently undergoing orthodontic therapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Crown Lengthening; CCL
Using the surgical guide, submarginal internal bevel incisions were performed on the buccal aspect of the affected teeth.
A full-thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction (Dominguez et al., 2020).
Ostectomy and osteoplasty were carried out by means of rotatory instruments and surgical chisels, as necessary, to achieve the necessary space between the bone crest and the restorative margin according to the presurgical plan.
The CEJ was not the reference point since, in many cases, the position of the final margin of the restoration was planned apical to the actual position of the CEJ.
Exposed root surfaces were carefully instrumented manually with curettes and, finally, vertical internal mattress sutures were placed to position the gingival margin at the level of the margin of the planned restoration.
Sutures were removed after 7 days.
|
Using the surgical guide, submarginal internal bevel incisions were performed on the buccal aspect of the affected teeth.
A full-thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction (Dominguez et al., 2020).
Ostectomy and osteoplasty were carried out by means of rotatory instruments and surgical chisels, as necessary, to achieve the necessary space between the bone crest and the restorative margin according to the presurgical plan.
The CEJ was not the reference point since, in many cases, the position of the final margin of the restoration was planned apical to the actual position of the CEJ.
Exposed root surfaces were carefully instrumented manually with curettes and, finally, vertical internal mattress sutures were placed to position the gingival margin at the level of the margin of the planned restoration.
Sutures were removed after 7 days
|
|
Experimental: Two-stage Crown Lengthening (SCL)
In the first surgical intervention, intrasulcular incisions were performed and a full thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction.
Ostectomy and osteoplasty were performed to establish the space for supracrestal tissue attachment, following the restorative plan and using the presurgical blueprint as the reference to determine the final position of the restoration margin, instead of the CEJ (Lee, 2004).
Then the flaps were repositioned and secured with internal mattress sutures, placing the gingival margin at the original level.
Sutures were removed at 7 days.
In the second stage, after 3-4 months, minor gingival recontouring was performed, if necessary, to attain the desired gingival margin position according to the presurgical plan
|
In the first surgical intervention, intrasulcular incisions were performed and a full thickness flap was raised up to the mucogingival junction.
Ostectomy and osteoplasty were performed to establish the space for supracrestal tissue attachment, following the restorative plan and using the presurgical blueprint as the reference to determine the final position of the restoration margin, instead of the CEJ (Lee, 2004).
Then the flaps were repositioned and secured with internal mattress sutures, placing the gingival margin at the original level.
Sutures were removed at 7 days.
In the second stage, after 3-4 months, minor gingival recontouring was performed, if necessary, to attain the desired gingival margin position according to the presurgical plan.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
T1-T4
Time Frame: Baseline-12 months
|
The difference in mm between the ideal gingival margin (T1) and the position of the gingival margin at 12 months (T4).
|
Baseline-12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Crown Length
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
Distance from the gingival margin to the incisal edge on the midbuccal.Measured in mm.
|
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
|
Amount of keratinized tissue
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
Distance from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction on the midbuccal.Measured in mm.
|
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
|
Gingival display upon smiling
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
Distance from the gingival margin of the central incisors to the lower edge of the upper lip.
Measured in mm.
|
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
|
Supracrestal tissue dimension
Time Frame: At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
Distance from the gingival margin to the alveolar bone crest (GM-ABC) as determined by bone sounding following local anesthesia.
Measured in mm.
|
At baseline, 6- and 12-month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Crown Lengthening RCT
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patients in Need of Surgical CL in the Anterior Maxillary Sextant for Restorative Purposes
-
NCT01152775UnknownThe Role of Multimedia on Retention and Comprehension of Key Concepts for Surgical Options in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients.
Clinical Trials on Conventional Crown Lengthening (CCL)
-
NCT05512312CompletedAltered Passive Eruption of Teeth | Gummy Smile | Guided Surgery
-
NCT07575087Completed
-
NCT04922086CompletedTooth Eruption Disorder
-
NCT03916653Unknown
-
NCT03947658CompletedCrown Lengthening
-
NCT06397521Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05616715Recruiting
-
NCT07041541Active, not recruitingAltered Passive Eruption of Teeth | Healthy Participants | Gummy Smile