Effectiveness of Self-myofascial Release Combined With Biofeedback and Electrical Stimulation for the Management of MFPP

February 5, 2021 updated by: Yang Shen, Zhongda Hospital

Effectiveness of Self-myofascial Release Combined With Biofeedback and Electrical Stimulation for the Management of Myofascial Pelvic Pain

Myofascial pelvic pain (MFPP) caused by myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) is a major contributor of female chronic pelvic pain. However, the effect of the patient's self-myofascial release (SMFR) is not clear. Current study is to investigate the effect of SMFR combined with biofeedback and electrical stimulation (BES) therapy compared with BES alone in patients with MFPP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

68 patients was enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: BES-SMFR group (n=34) and BES group (n=34). Every patient received 4 weeks treatment, and was evaluated at baseline (T0), 4-week post-intervention (T4) and 12-week follow-up (T12). The primary outcome was pain intensity. The secondary outcomes were degree in activation of MTrPs, surface electromyography (sEMG) levels, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
82

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • Zhongda Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age between 18 and 70 years;
  2. presence of persistent chronic pelvic pain ≥ 4 points on a 10 points numeric rating scale for at least 3 months;
  3. at least one active MTrP in one of muscle group including obturator internus, levator ani, piriformis, coccygeus on pelvic examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. diseases of the urinary, genital, colorectal systems;
  2. prolapse of the pelvic organ;
  3. a history of pelvic rehabilitation within the 3 months prior to study;
  4. psychiatric disorders;
  5. pregnancy;
  6. breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BES-SMFR group
Using the same Vishee neuro-muscle stimulator as the sEMG assessment with a vaginal probe was inserted into the vagina and placed close to the PFMs. Three standardized programs were used in our study: (1) Tens electricity (first program): 5 min of 50-280 Hz frequency and a pulse duration of 50 µs. (b) Endorphin electricity (second program): 5 min of 1-10 Hz frequency and a pulse duration of 200 µs. (c) Spasmolysis electricity (third program): 5 min of 1-2 Hz frequency and a pulse duration of 300 µs. At the same time, patients could learn about their neuromuscular activity through the biofeedback instrument, abdominal breathing for 5 sec was necessary when PFMs were overactive.
Procedure: BES-SMFR
For the BES intervention, it was performed using the same Vishee neuro-muscle stimulator as the sEMG assessment with a vaginal probe was inserted into the vagina and placed close to the PFMs. At the same time, patients could learn about their neuromuscular activity through the biofeedback instrument, abdominal breathing for 5 sec was necessary when PFMs were overactive. BES was performed once every 2 days for 4 weeks.
Active Comparator: BES group
  1. A standardized and structured vaginal examination was performed by digital palpation to identify pelvic floor active MTrPs, and then pain mapping was developed for the patient's use.
  2. Patients were required to participate in intensive training regarding myofascial release techniques. (I) Pressing: press directly on a specific MTrP with gentle, slow pressures (2kg/cm2) using a flat palpation, the pressure was sustained until the participant perceived the pain decreased and taut band released, and then gradually increased to previous level of MTrPs tension and maintained until a reduction of pain again. The process was usually 3 to 5 repetitions for 90 sec. (II) Stretching: stretch in parallel to the direction of the myofascial to facilitate elongation of a contracted muscle. (III) Strumming: stroking and strumming the affected muscles region with the fingertips to aid in MTrPs tension release, the initial pressure was small and increased gradually until the patients adapted.
Procedure: BES
First, a standardized and structured vaginal examination was performed by digital palpation to identify pelvic floor active MTrPs, and then pain mapping was developed for the patient's use. Second, patients were required to participate in intensive training regarding myofascial release techniques. Following the training, SMFR was regularly performed by at home for 5 minutes daily for 4 weeks. SMFR was confirmed with patients at all their follow up visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of pain intensity
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Pain intensity was calculated by using the visual numeric rating scale (NRS), which is a 11-point rating scale ranging from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst pain imaginable) . For each patient, the NRS referred to pain elicited while palpating bilaterally each PFM groups and was averaged pain across all the muscles. Upon palpation, the patient was asked to place in a resting, semi-recumbent position with legs supported by pillow to prevent excessive tension in the PFMs.
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The degree in activation of MTrPs
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
MTrPs were considered as active when the following criteria was met: (1) Presence of a palpable taut band in the muscle; (2) Presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band; (3) Local twitch response elicited by snapping palpation; (4) Reproduction of the typical referred pain pattern in response to the compression of tender spots; and (5) Spontaneous presence of the typical referred pain pattern. Active MTrPs localized mainly in the bilateral obturator internus, levator ani, piriformis and coccygeus were assessed respectively by pelvic floor manual palpation. Using the inclusion criterion of having active MTrPs at least one in the bilateral muscles as a cutoff point.
Up to 12 weeks
Surface electromyography (sEMG) levels of the PFMs
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The PFMs sEMG assessment was performed based on Glazer protocol by using the device of Vishee neuro-muscle stimulator (MyoTrac Infiniti, model SA9800, Thought Technology Ltd., Montreal, Canada). The sEMG amplitude mean value based on Glazer protocols for selected tasks were follows: 60-s pretest resting baseline, assessing the resting amplitude of PFM before the test sequence; 5 rapid contractions (quick flicks), assessing fast muscles function; 60-s endurance contraction, assessing slow muscles function; 60-s posttest resting baseline, assessing the resting amplitude of PFM after the test sequence.
Up to 12 weeks
The score of Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
PGI-I is a patient self-reporting evaluation that assesses overall perception of response to treatment according to a 7-point scale, including very much worse, much worse, a little worse, no change, a little better, much better or very much better, with lower scores indicating more favorable outcomes. Better response to treatment was considered when a PGI-I score < 3 (very much better or much better).
Up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhongda Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Yang Shen, MD,PhD, Zhongda Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Zhongda Hospital

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myofascial Pelvic Pain

Clinical Trials on BES-SMFR

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings