Comparison of Tofacitinib and Methotrexate in Takayasu's Arteritis

October 9, 2024 updated by: Jiang lindi, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib and Methotrexate Based on Prednisone Therapy in Patients with Active Phase of Takayasu's Arteritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and methotrexate based on prednisone therapy in patients with Takayasu arteritis

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Takayasu's arteritis (TAK), a chronic large vessel vasculitis, involves the aorta and its main branches. Glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, cyclophosphamide are common agents for TAK treatment. However, their effects for remission induction and relapse prevention are not satisfied. More effective agents for TAK treatment remain to be investigated. Tofacitinib (TOF) is a Jak inhibitor, which has been proved to be effective in multiple autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. Our preliminary real-world study also demonstrated a promising treatment effect of TOF in patients with TAK. But its efficacy and safety needs further verification. The present randomized controlled trial aimes to compare efficacy between methotrexate and tofacitinib in TAK treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Lindi Jiang
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients met 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria or 2018 ACR classification criteria (draft) of TAK
  2. Women or men aged 18-65
  3. All patients agreed that there is no fertility plan during clinical trials, and the results of female serum or urinary pregnancy tests must be negative
  4. Active TAK patients according to NIH disease activity criteria
  5. All patients agreed to sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with organ failure who accord to one or more of the following conditions:

    I.Heart function New York class 4 II.Glomerular filtration rate ≤ 60ml/min III.Liver function Child grade 2 and above IV.High-frequency melanoma (attacks for 3 consecutive days) V.Acute cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage VI.Blood pressure > 160/100mmHg

  2. Patients who received revascularization surgery related to the treatment of TAK within 3 months (except balloon dilatation); balloon dilatation or surgery unrelated to TAK within 1 month
  3. Patients who have other autoimmune diseases (e.g. ANCA-associated vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Behcet's disease, etc.)
  4. Patients with severe, progressive or uncontrolled comorbidities of kidney, liver, blood system, gastrointestinal, lung, heart, etc or other coexisting medical conditions that may exert unexpected risks
  5. Patients with concomitant diseases, such as asthma, that may require additional medium to high doses of glucocorticoids (prednisone ≥ 10mg/ days or equivalent dose) during the study period
  6. Patients with active infections with HBV, HCV, tuberculosis or other serious acute or chronic infections
  7. Patients with malignancies
  8. Patients with one or more of the following abnormal laboratory examinations I.Serum ALT or AST ≥ 1.5 times the normal upper limit; II.White blood cell count ≤ 4 × 109/L III.Platelet count ≤ 100x109/L IV.Hemoglobin < 85g/L V.Other abnormal laboratory tests that may cause unacceptable risks
  9. Patients allergic to the experimental drug
  10. Patients who have ever failed to tofacitinib or methotrexate after 3 months' treatment in previous medical history

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Tofacitinib
Partcipants would be given one tablet of tofacitinib (5mg per tablet), twice per day, the treatment duration will last 12 months during the whole follow-up period.
Drug: Tofacitinib
  1. Tofacitinib 5mg twice a day for 12 months;
  2. Basic treatment with prednisone: (1) the initial dose of prednisone (or equivalent): 0.8mg/kg/day (maximum 60mg/day). (2) Glucocorticoids tapering: glucocorticoids is tapered after two weeks treatment and is tapered 5mg each 2 weeks to 10mg qd in the first 6 months if patients were in inactive status based on the NIH disease activity criteria. During the 6th to 12th month, glucocorticoids is tapered 2.5mg each 4 weeks until 7.5mg qd if patients were in inactive status based on the NIH disease activity criteria.
Other Names:
  • TOF
Active Comparator: Methotrexate
Participates would be given tablets of methotrexate (2.5mg per tablet) 15mg each week, the treatment duration will last 12 months during the whole follow-up period.
Drug: Methotrexate
  1. Methotrexate (15mg each week) for 12 months
  2. Basic treatment with prednisone: (1) the initial dose of prednisone (or equivalent): 0.8mg/kg/day (maximum 60mg/day). (2) Glucocorticoids tapering: glucocorticoids is tapered after two weeks treatment and is tapered 5mg each 2 weeks to 10mg qd in the first 6 months if patients were in inactive status based on the NIH disease activity criteria. During the 6th to 12th month, glucocorticoids is tapered 2.5mg each 4 weeks until 7.5mg qd if patients were in inactive status based on the NIH disease activity criteria.
Other Names:
  • MTX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effectiveness rate after 6 months' treatment
Time Frame: From the enrollment to the end of 6 months
The effectiveness rate equals to patients who achieved this goal /patients at the end of 6 months. The effectiveness was defined as satisfying three of the following 1)-4) criteria and the 5) criteria: 1) no systemic symptoms such as weakness, weight loss, etc; 2) no new ischemic symptoms or signs; 3) normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); 4) no new vascular progression or new lesions upon imaging; 5) GCs is tapered to 10mg qd and this dosage is maintained for 4 weeks.
From the enrollment to the end of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse free survival rate
Time Frame: From the enrollment to the the end of 12 month
Ratio of patients without relapse after achieving remission during the 12 months follow-up
From the enrollment to the the end of 12 month
The cumulative dosage of GCs during the whole period of 12-months follow-up
Time Frame: From the enrollment to the the end of 12 months
The cumulative dosage = Sum of doses of prednisone （or equivalents） each day
From the enrollment to the the end of 12 months
Side effects rate
Time Frame: From the enrollment to the the end of 12 months
Ratio of patients with side effects. All the kinds of adverse event related to the treatment and the disease itself will be recorded.
From the enrollment to the the end of 12 months
The remission rate with GCs 7.5mg qd at the end of 12 months
Time Frame: From the enrollment to the the end of 12 months
Ratio of patients who achieved remission with GCs 7.5mg qd at the end of 12 months. The remission is defined as satisfying three of the following 1)-4) criteria: 1) no systemic symptoms such as weakness, weight loss, etc; 2) no new ischemic symptoms or signs; 3) normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR); 4) no new vascular progression or new lesions upon imaging. It is required that GCs 7.5mg qd should be maintained at least for four weeks.
From the enrollment to the the end of 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Lindi Jiang, Ph.D., M.D., Department of Rheumatology in Zhongshan hospital, Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TACTIC-TM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings