Project 4: Ambulatory Biofeedback and Voice Therapy for Patients With Vocal Hyperfunction

May 7, 2025 updated by: Jarrad Van Stan, Massachusetts General Hospital

Preliminary Studies to Test the Effects of Ambulatory Biofeedback in Small Groups of Patients With Vocal Hyperfunction: Study 3

Vocal hyperfunction (VH) is the most commonly treated class of voice disorders by speech-language pathologists and voice therapy is the primary curative treatment. Patients and clinicians report that generalizing improved voicing into daily life is the most significant barrier to successful therapy. We will test if extending biofeedback into the patient's daily life using ambulatory voice monitoring will significantly improve generalization during therapy and if individual patient factors, like how easily they can modify their voice and engagement during therapy, moderate the effects of the biofeedback.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vocal hyperfunction (VH) is ostensibly caused by and/or associated with pathological daily voice use and involves the most commonly treated voice disorders by speech-language pathologists, e.g., vocal fold nodules, muscle tension dysphonia. Voice therapy is the primary curative option for VH. For example, even when patients undergo laryngeal surgery to remove lesions, they are still thought to be at risk for recurrence unless they successfully complete post-surgical voice therapy. However, voice therapy suffers from high rates of patient dropout. Patients and clinicians report that generalizing desired vocal behaviors from the therapy session into daily life is one of the most significant barriers to successful voice therapy. Despite this critical barrier, voice therapy remains entirely dependent upon episodic delivery within an in-clinic or virtual session. Thus, this project will test if adding Ambulatory Voice Monitoring with Biofeedback (AVM-B) significantly addresses this generalization challenge, as it can directly extend therapeutic activities into the patient's daily life. A clinical trial will randomize patients with VH to receive an evidence-based therapy (Conversation Training Therapy; CTT) or CTT with AVM-B added. In Aim 1, it is hypothesized that, compared to patients who only received CTT, patients who receive CTT and AVM-B will demonstrate significantly better generalization during therapy which will be retained immediately after therapy and six months later. In Aim 2, we will explore patient factors that mediate the relationship between therapy and generalization, hypothesizing that stimulabilty-how easily a patient can modify their voice-and engagement-the patient's level of effort during therapy-will be positively correlated to the amount of generalization in daily life. If successful, this work would result in multiple paradigm-shifting impacts with potential to improve the efficiency of clinical practice. AVM-B would become one of the first evidence-based voice treatment activities taking place primarily outside the therapy session. Future work could investigate how AVM-B could transition voice therapy from once-a-week sessions into a continuous process integrated into the patient's daily life. Further inquiry could improve generalization by identifying evidence-based methods to tailor therapy based on individual patient factors such as stimulability and engagement. After discharge, AVM-B could provide a means for patients to "recalibrate" themselves and prevent relapse without having to see a clinician. Finally, implementation work could help clinicians adopt/adapt AVM-B and evaluate its effects on dropouts.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Robert Hillman, PhD, CCC-SLP
  • Phone Number: 617-643-2466

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Recruiting
        • Boston Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria for PVH:

  • Diagnosis of vocal fold nodules and polyps.
  • Secondary diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) or gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)
  • Secondary diagnoses commonly associated with phonotrauma like erythema, edema, varies, ectasia, laryngitis, secondary/reactive muscle tension dysphonia (MTD), hemorrhage, etc.

Exclusion criteria for PVH:

  • Any secondary diagnosis not directly related to phonotrauma, like cyst, sulk, cancer, bamboo nodule, known or suspected paralysis, etc.

Inclusion criteria for NPVH:

  • Diagnosis of primary MTD.
  • Allowable secondary diagnoses are LPR and GERD.

Exclusion criteria for NPVH:

  • Any secondary diagnosis related to pathological structure (e.g., nodules, polyps, edema, cancer), neurology (e.g., paralysis, Parkinson's Disease), or respiration (e.g., chronic cough, paradoxical vocal fold motion).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Conversation Training Therapy with Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback
Conversation Training Therapy will be administered one time per week for 1 hour. Ambulatory Voice Monitoring with Biofeedback will be administered during the second therapy session and for 5 days between the second and third therapy sessions.
Device: Ambulatory Voice Monitoring with Biofeedback (AVM-B)
AVM-B is software on the Voice Health Monitor that uses a neck-placed accelerometer to sense neck skin vibrations during voicing in daily life. The AVM-B consists of cues every time the patient exceeds a subject-specific threshold, [100% frequency AVM-B] and/or summary statistics every 2 minutes of voicing [Summary AVM-B].
Behavioral: Conversation Training Therapy
CTT is a 4-week (1 45-minute session per week) evidence-based voice therapy for patients with VH, developed primarily to maximize the amount and speed of generalization outside the therapy session. It consists of 3 required targets: Decreased overall auditory-perceptual voice severity, improved discrimination between baseline and improved voicing, and adherence to CTT recommendations in daily life. The three optional targets are decreased overall auditory-perceptual severity across an increased pitch range, loudness range, and decreased rate of speech. All voice-related targets are modified through practicing voicing with increased forward resonance and mean airflow in spontaneous speech/conversation.
Active Comparator: Conversation Training Therapy alone
Conversation Training Therapy will be administered one time per week for 1 hour.
Behavioral: Conversation Training Therapy
CTT is a 4-week (1 45-minute session per week) evidence-based voice therapy for patients with VH, developed primarily to maximize the amount and speed of generalization outside the therapy session. It consists of 3 required targets: Decreased overall auditory-perceptual voice severity, improved discrimination between baseline and improved voicing, and adherence to CTT recommendations in daily life. The three optional targets are decreased overall auditory-perceptual severity across an increased pitch range, loudness range, and decreased rate of speech. All voice-related targets are modified through practicing voicing with increased forward resonance and mean airflow in spontaneous speech/conversation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Generalization
Time Frame: Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
Generalization will be represented as a "percent accuracy" where voiced frames of a feature that are above or below a percentile threshold (based on baseline/pre-therapy monitoring data) are divided by the total number of voiced frames.
Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
Stimulability
Time Frame: This will be calculated before therapy begins.
Stimulability will be represented as a "percent accuracy" where voiced frames of a feature that are above or below a percentile threshold (based on baseline/pre-therapy monitoring data) are divided by the total number of voiced frames.
This will be calculated before therapy begins.
Rehabilitation Treatment Intensity Scale (RITS)
Time Frame: Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
The RITS scale is one scale with 7 levels where the 1 represents the "absence of effort" and 7 represents "superior effort." The patient's treating clinician will judge his/her engagement during therapy after each session. These judgements will provide valid and reliable estimates of patient engagement.
Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation - Voice (CAPE-V)
Time Frame: Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
The CAPE-V consists of 4 perceptually judged 100-mm visual analog scales (Overall auditory perceptual severity, Breathiness, Strain, Roughness). The patient's treating clinician will judge standard audio samples. These judgements provide gold-standard perceptual ratings of voice quality to evaluate if therapy and AVM-B are associated with improved voice quality.
Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL)
Time Frame: Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy
The V-RQOL consists of 10 Likert-style questions ranging from 1-5 (1 = no problem at all; 2 = a small amount; 3 = a moderate problem; 4 = a lot; 5 = problem is as bas as it can be) that estimates how the subject's vocal function effects his/her daily life. This patient reported outcome measure will be used to evaluate if the patients perceive that therapy helped them function better in their activities of daily living.
Before therapy, immediately after therapy, and 6 months after therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Emory University
Boston Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jarrad Van Stan, PhD, CCC-SLP, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016P002849C

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data to be shared will include stimulability before therapy, average generalization each week of therapy, and patient-reported and clinician-rated outcomes before, after, and 6 months after voice therapy. These are the data that will be used in the analyses and the basis for manuscripts and results. Thus, they are the data necessary for the scientific community to replicate findings or integrate results into meta-analyses and data synthesis.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available concurrent with publications where applicable and after the study finishes in 2029.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

To maximize the appropriate sharing of scientific data and protect research participants' privacy and confidentiality, reuse of this dataset should use the following Data Use Limitations (DULs) under Controlled Access that is made available by a data repository only after approval of the request by the Harvard Dataverse independent review panel process; including Health/Medical/Biomedical controls and IRB Approval Required. To protect research participants' privacy and confidentiality, data submitted to the repository will not include personally identifiable information such as names, addresses, etc. Additional protections, such as the approach for managing Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act identified, will be used for de-identification or to provide a limited data set to minimize the risk of participant reidentification.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Voice Disorders

Clinical Trials on Ambulatory Voice Monitoring with Biofeedback (AVM-B)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings