Safer Aging With Diabetes Monitoring (SAGE)

April 21, 2025 updated by: Kaiser Permanente

Pragmatic Clinical Trial of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Interventions for Safe Insulin Use in High-Risk Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Older adults with type 2 diabetes are at higher risk for severe hypoglycemia and its related complications (including hospitalization and death) when taking insulin. This study proposes to evaluate, in a randomized clinical trial, a strategy of safe insulin prescribing based on an educational program that leverages continuous glucose monitoring to support older adults at high risk for hypoglycemia. If the aims of this project are achieved, this novel care strategy could be widely applied to reduce severe hypoglycemia episodes in older, high-risk adults with type 2 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The overarching goal of this pragmatic randomized clinical trial is to support safer diabetes care in older adults (age ≥ 75) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who require insulin therapy. Many of these older adults are at high risk for severe hypoglycemia due to symptom unawareness and/or nocturnal hypoglycemia. Effective and safe management in this population requires close glucose monitoring coupled with proactive medication and diet adjustment to avoid severe iatrogenic consequences. This study proposes to achieve this goal through a patient-oriented intervention program that incorporates the use of alarm-enabled continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). There are currently no major randomized trials directly assessing the use of CGM to reduce severe hypoglycemia among the oldest adults with T2D. The study team will conduct a 2-arm trial: 1) Group-based, three-session education intervention (CGM provided to participants) vs. 2) usual care (no CGM provided to participants). The primary outcome is an aggregate measure of clinically significant hypoglycemia. The study will also examine differences in patient-reported diabetes distress, fear of hypoglycemia, and self-efficacy using validated survey measures.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
360

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Fremont, California, United States, 94538
        • Recruiting
        • Kaiser Permanente Fremont
        • Contact:
          • Ilana A Peterson
      • San Jose, California, United States, 94538
        • Recruiting
        • Kaiser Permanente San Jose
        • Contact:
      • San Leandro, California, United States, 94577
        • Recruiting
        • Kaiser Permanente San Leandro
        • Contact:
          • Ilana A Peterson
      • Union City, California, United States, 94587
        • Recruiting
        • Kaiser Permanente - Union City
        • Contact:
          • Ilana A Peterson

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 75 years and older
  • Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
  • Current treatment with insulin
  • Increased hypoglycemia risk (prior year hypoglycemia by self-report or utilization)
  • Able to communicate in English
  • Able to access email and the Internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • On renal dialysis
  • Dementia
  • Pacemaker or Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
  • Using insulin pump
  • Severe Mental Illness
  • Severe Visual Impairment
  • In Hospice
  • Current or recent CGM use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group Education Sessions
Participants will participate in 3 educational sessions designed to teach about applying and using continuous glucose monitors [CGMs] (Session 1) and how to prevent hypoglycemia episodes based on CGM readings and hypoglycemia journal entries (Sessions 2 & 3).
Behavioral: SAGE Group Sessions
Participants enroll in 3 educational group sessions and receive CGMs
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Participants allocated to the control arm will continue with usual care.
Other: Usual Care
Participants continue to receive usual care (Control Arm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypoglycemia aggregate outcome
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare the proportion of patients in the three study arms with self-reported hypoglycemia (symptomatic and/or requiring help from others) and/or hypoglycemia-related utilization (emergency department, hospital or outpatient new events) 6- and 12-months after enrollment
6 and 12 months after study start date

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-reported hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare the proportion of patients in the three study arms with self-reported hypoglycemia (symptomatic and/or requiring help from others)
6 and 12 months after study start date
Hypoglycemia-related utilization
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare the proportion of patients in the three study arms with hypoglycemia-related utilization (emergency department, hospital or outpatient new events)
6 and 12 months after study start date
Diabetes Distress
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare responses to the 2-item, validated Diabetes Distress survey
6 and 12 months after study start date
Hypoglycemia Confidence
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare responses to the 9-item, validated Hypoglycemia Confidence survey
6 and 12 months after study start date
Hypoglycemia Distress
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare responses to the 3-item, validated Hypoglycemia Distress survey
6 and 12 months after study start date

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technology Proficiency
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will compare responses to a 3-item subset of the validated Technology Proficiency survey
6 and 12 months after study start date
Confidence in Adjusting Insulin
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will assess confidence in adjusting insulin across the 3 study arms using a 3-item survey
6 and 12 months after study start date
Insulin Adjustment
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will assess patient self-report of changes to insulin regimen in preceding 6 months
6 and 12 months after study start date
Caregiver Action
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months after study start date
This outcome will assess patient self-report of caregiver taking action to address low blood sugar in preceding 6 months
6 and 12 months after study start date

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kaiser Permanente

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Richard W Grant, MD MPH, Kaiser Permanente Northern California - Division of Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB-1996616
  • R01DK134446 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on SAGE Group Sessions

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings