Exploring Neurosphere's Remote Monitoring and Virtual Clinic Features in Improve Quality of Life and Reduce Costs (TRC-AB-1)

May 7, 2026 updated by: Mahesh Pattabiraman

Abbott Neurosphere™ Pilot Study: Remote Monitoring and Virtual Clinic Features in Improving Quality of Life and Potential Cost-Saving

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Abbott's Proclaim™ and Eterna™ Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) systems, along with the Neurosphere™ virtual clinic platform, in managing chronic pain. The goal is to assess how remote monitoring and virtual care can improve pain relief and reduce healthcare costs compared to traditional in-person care. Adults with chronic pain will either receive treatment through in-person visits or remotely using Neurosphere™. The study will measure pain relief, quality of life, and healthcare expenses over six months, aiming to improve access to pain management, especially for patients in rural areas.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Nebraska
      • Grand Island, Nebraska, United States, 68803
        • Grand Island Pain Relief Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will include adult participants aged 19 years and older who are experiencing chronic neuropathic pain that is refractory to medical treatment and are eligible for SCS therapy based on FDA-approved indications. Participants will be recruited from a rural population, with effort made for including individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. Study will enroll patients who can legally provide consent and are willing to adhere to the study protocol, including remote monitoring or in-person follow-up visits.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 19 years and older experiencing chronic neuropathic pain that is refractory to medical treatment and eligible for SCS based on FDA-approved indications.
  • Individuals who can legally provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable or unwilling to adhere to the requirements of remote monitoring, follow-up schedules, or other aspects of the study protocol.
  • Patients with uncontrolled psychiatric conditions, including severe depression or anxiety, which could interfere with their ability to participate fully in the study or accurately report outcomes.
  • Women who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding, as the safety and efficacy of SCS in these populations are not established.
  • Patients who have previously experienced significant adverse events or complications from SCS implantation or stimulation that would make further use unsafe or ineffective.
  • Patients with other active implantable devices (e.g., pacemakers or defibrillators) that could interfere with the functionality of the SCS system.
  • Patients with a documented history of substance abuse within
  • Patients with significant comorbid conditions (severe cardiovascular disease, unmanaged diabetes, uncontrolled infection, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Test
Patients receiving SCS therapy through Neutrosphere virtual clinic platform (remote pain management group).
Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation - Neurosphere
Test Group Intervention: Test group participants will receive remote monitoring and therapy adjustments through the Neurosphere™ virtual clinic platform. Participants in test group will have trial and end of trial phases in clinic, but further SCS therapy will be performed through Neurosphere. Clinicians will adjust the SCS device settings, including pulse width and burst frequency, remotely. This intervention allows patients to avoid in-person visits while receiving continuous, personalized care, with follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months over a 6-month period.
Other Names:
  • Remote Pain Management
Control Group
Participants in this group will receive traditional in-person care for their SCS therapy. Group regular clinic visits for therapy adjustments, monitoring, and pain management
Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation - In Clinic
Control Group Intervention: In-Person SCS therapy. Device settings, such as pulse width and frequency, will be adjusted during regular clinic visits. Follow-up assessments for pain relief, quality of life, and therapy effectiveness will occur at 1, 3, and 6-month intervals over a 6-month period.
Other Names:
  • neuromodulation
  • In Person SCS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Relief - NRS
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention
Pain relief in numerical pain rating scale (NRS). Numerical points.
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention
Healthcare Cost Reduction
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post-intervention
This outcome measures the reduction in healthcare costs associated with the use of the Neurosphere™ remote monitoring platform compared to traditional in-person care. Costs will be assessed through an analysis of healthcare resource utilization using time-driven activity-based costing TDABC methodology.
From baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Quality of Life and Functional Disability Improvements - ODI
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention
Change in quality of life and functional disability in participants quantified through numerical response to Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) compared to baseline
Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mahesh Pattabiraman

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IIS-24-ABT-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD related to the primary and secondary outcomes of the study, including anonymized data on pain relief, quality of life, healthcare utilization, and cost-effectiveness, will be shared. The shared data will include patient-reported outcomes (e.g., ODI and NRS for pain), as well as relevant clinical and financial data collected throughout the study. A detailed data dictionary, explaining all variables, will be provided to ensure proper interpretation. IPD will be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the study results

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Stimulation - Neurosphere

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings