Osteopathic Visceral Manipulation on Functional Constipation in Obese Adults

April 25, 2025 updated by: Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Abd El hady El Fahl,ph.d, MTI University

Osteopathic Visceral Manipulation on Functional Constipation in Obese Adults: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Functional constipation in obese adults is a prevalent gastrointestinal issue characterized by infrequent bowel movements, difficulty during defecation, or a sensation of incomplete evacuation. Obesity is a significant risk factor for functional constipation due to several physiological and lifestyle-related factors. Excess body weight, particularly in the abdominal region, may exert pressure on the colon, leading to disrupted bowel function. Additionally, dietary habits common among obese individuals, such as low fiber intake and inadequate hydration, can worsen constipation. Sedentary lifestyles further contribute to reduced gastrointestinal motility. Addressing functional constipation in obese adults requires a multifaceted approach, including dietary modifications to increase fiber and fluid intake, regular physical activity, and, in some cases, medical interventions to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Visceral manipulation is a gentle manual therapy that focuses on the internal organs, particularly those within the gastrointestinal tract, to enhance their function and alleviate symptoms associated with various disorders. Practitioners of visceral manipulation use their hands to apply specific, subtle forces to the affected areas, aiming to improve the mobility and motility of the organs. This technique is based on the premise that the body's organs are interconnected by fascia and ligaments, and any restriction or imbalance in these connections can lead to dysfunction and disease. By restoring the natural movement of these organs, visceral manipulation is believed to improve blood circulation, enhance digestive function, and reduce pain and discomfort associated with gastrointestinal disorders.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 4450113
        • faculty of physical therapy ,Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients diagnosed with functional constipation according to Rome IV criteria
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with organic gastrointestinal diseases, Pregnancy or lactation
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the last 30 days, Endocrine and metabolic disorders (eg, hypothyroidism, hypercalcemia, diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus)
  • Neurologic and psychiatric disorders (spina bifida, cerebral palsy, anorexia nervosa, known autism spectrum disorders)
  • Secondary constipation to drug consumption, History of abdominal surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: osteopathic visceral manipulation
Group A received osteopathic visceral manipulation with standard care
Other: visceral manipulation
The procedure begins with the patient lying in a comfortable supine position to ensure relaxation and access to the abdominal region. Gentle palpation is used to assess tissue mobility and identify any restrictions or tension points. The practitioner applies light, rhythmic pressure to the gastroduodenal junction to stimulate movement and improve coordination between the stomach and duodenum. Attention is then given to the sphincter of Oddi, where soft, sustained pressure is employed to facilitate the release of bile and pancreatic juices, aiding digestive processes. Moving to the duodenojejunal flexure, the therapist uses gentle stretching and mobilization techniques to alleviate any obstructions, promoting smoother passage of intestinal contents. Finally, the sigmoid colon is manipulated with circular and oscillatory pressures to enhance peristalsis and relieve constipation.
Other Names:
  • standard care only
No Intervention: control
Group B received standard care only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stool consistency
Time Frame: at baseline and at three weeks
Patients were asked to describe the consistency of their stools during the previous month, choosing between the terms "hard or very hard," "not too hard, not too soft (normal)," "soft or very soft," "mucous, with undigested food," and "liquid," they also had the opportunity to answer that the stools were "variable" in consistency. In addition, patients were asked to choose the BSS stool type that best represented their stools on a picture chart
at baseline and at three weeks
Defecation Pain
Time Frame: at baseline and at three weeks
Clearly explain to the patient the purpose of assessing their defecation pain using Arabic version of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) form: A horizontal or vertical line, typically 10 centimeters in length, anchored by two descriptors at each end representing "no pain" and "worst possible pain."
at baseline and at three weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Defecation frequency
Time Frame: at baseline and at three weeks
Utilize a standardized stool diary where participants record each defecation event, including the date
at baseline and at three weeks
Dose of oral laxative
Time Frame: at baseline and at three weeks
dose of oral laxative and time. Ensure the diary is easy to use to promote accurate self-reporting. Supplement diary entries with qualitative interviews to understand lifestyle, dietary habits, and stress levels, which may influence bowel movement
at baseline and at three weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
MTI University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 11, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB # 22 /3 / 2024-2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation - Functional

Clinical Trials on visceral manipulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings