Large Language Models Assist in Tumor MDT

March 25, 2026 updated by: Yunfang Yu, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Evaluating Large Language Models as Decision Support Agents in Pan-Cancer Tumor Boards: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) represent the gold standard for personalized tumor treatment, but they are limited by medical resources and accessibility Limitation. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in medical reasoning, their multidisciplinary practicality in pan-cancer MDTs has not been fully explored. In the early stage of this project, LLMs with high clinical application efficacy were identified through benchmark tests, and an open-label randomized controlled study (RCT) was conducted based on these LLMs. The research aims to explore whether AI-assisted assistance can enhance the accuracy and writing efficiency of MDT diagnosis and treatment reports. This study intends to prospectively collect the diagnosis and treatment information of 20 patients and MDT diagnosis and treatment information. It is planned to recruit 40 junior doctors. Doctors in the intervention group will use LLM to assist in the writing of MDT reports, while doctors in the control group will use traditional information retrieval methods for the writing of MDT reports. Three clinical experts ultimately used a standardized Likert scale to conduct comprehensive and multidisciplinary scoring of the MDT reports of the intervention group and the control group. This study quantitatively compared the diagnosis and treatment quality and efficiency of the MDT AI-assisted model and the traditional model to verify the application potential of large language models in assisting tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A junior doctor with a practicing physician qualification certificate.
  • Oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists and pathologists with 3 to 5 years of clinical experience.
  • Age: 25 to 33 years old, gender not limited.
  • During the research period, one can participate for no less than 10 hours.
  • Agree to participate in this research and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have participated in the previous diagnosis and treatment of any one of the 20 cases included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AI-MDT
This study was a prospective RCT, and the intervention content was an auxiliary tool for writing MDT reports. The intervention group used LLM to assist in the writing of MDT reports. The prescribed MDT medical records (excluding diagnosis and treatment opinions) were input into the LLM, and the output content could be used as a reference for the MDT report. Finally, the MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions were written under the personal judgment of the doctors.
Other: LLM assists in MDT report writing
This study was a prospective RCT, and the intervention content was an auxiliary tool for writing MDT reports. The intervention group used LLM to assist in the writing of MDT reports. The prescribed MDT medical records (excluding diagnosis and treatment opinions) were input into the LLM, and the output content could be used as a reference for the MDT report. Finally, the MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions were written under the personal judgment of the doctors. The control group used traditional information retrieval methods (such as Google, literature, and textbooks) to write MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions.
No Intervention: Trad-MDT
The control group used traditional information retrieval methods (such as Google, literature, and textbooks) to write MDT diagnosis and treatment opinions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The overall score of the MDT report
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
Clinical experts comprehensively evaluated the diagnosis and treatment opinions of different departments in the MDT report, and used the standardized Likert scale to comprehensively score the MDT reports of the intervention group and the control group (1 to 5 points, the higher the better).
Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The radiation oncology score of the MDT report
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
Clinical experts used a standardized Likert scale to score the radiotherapy department's diagnosis and treatment opinions reported by the MDT in the intervention group and the control group (1 to 5 points, the higher the better).
Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
The medical oncology score of the MDT report
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
Clinical experts used the standardized Likert scale to score the medical oncology diagnosis and treatment opinions reported by the MDT in the intervention group and the control group (1 to 5 points, the higher the better).
Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
The pathology score of the MDT report
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
Clinical experts used the standardized Likert scale to score the pathological diagnosis and treatment opinions reported by the MDT in the intervention group and the control group (1 to 5 points, the higher the better).
Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
The radiology score of the MDT report
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
Clinical experts used a standardized Likert scale to score the radiology diagnosis and treatment opinions reported by the MDT in the intervention group and the control group (1 to 5 points, the higher the better).
Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
The time consumption in writing an MDT report
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).
The intervention group and the control group completed the MDT report for each case at all times (unit: hours).
Up to 4 weeks, complete the writing of medical opinions for all cases (n=20).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Herui Yao, PhD, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
  • Study Chair: Yunfang Yu, PhD, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SYSKY-2026-071-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Requests for the individual data or study documents will be considered where the proposed use aligns with public good purposes, does not conflict with other requests, and the requestor is willing to sign a data access agreement. Contact is though the corresponding author.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stomach Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings