A Dose-finding Study of OPC-6535 in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

April 5, 2021 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of OPC-6535 (tetomilast) and to determine its optimal dose by once-daily oral administration at 0, 12.5, 25, or 50 mg for 8 weeks in combination with a fixed oral dose of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with active ulcerative colitis.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chubu Region, Japan
      • Chugoku Region, Japan
      • Hokkaido region, Japan
      • Kanto Region, Japan
      • Kinki Region, Japan
      • Kyushu Region, Japan
      • Shikoku Region, Japan
      • Touhoku Region, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active ulcerative colitis
  • Patients who have been receiving an oral 5-ASA formulation at a fixed regimen and at a fixed dose
  • Either inpatient or outpatient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a history of intestinal resection (other than appendiceal resection)
  • Patients who have a complication of malignant tumor
  • Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or possibly pregnant, or who wish to become pregnant during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
Definition of clinical improvement: Disease Activity Index (DAI) subscore for rectal bleeding improved to 0 or 1 and DAI subscore for mucosal appearance improved by at least 1 point from baseline
Weeks 4 and 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remission Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100) After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Weeks 4 and 8
Definition of remission: DAI subscores for both rectal bleeding and mucosal appearance improved to 0
Weeks 4 and 8
Mean Change From the Baseline in Total DAI Score After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance at endoscopy, and physician's rating of disease activity. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; the total score ranges from 0 to 12 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
Mean Change From the Baseline in DAI Subscores After 4 and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, mucosal appearance at endoscopy, and physician's rating of disease activity. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.
Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
Mean Change From the Baseline in Total Clinical Activity Index (CAI) Score After 2, 4, and 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
CAI composed of 7 variables: number of stool weekly, blood in stools (weekly average), investigator's global assessment of symptomatic state, abdominal pain/cramps, temperature due to colitis, extraintestinal manifestations, and laboratory findings. The scores ranging from 0 to 29 points (higher scores meaning more severe disease).
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8
Mean Change From the Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ score was calculated as the sum of the responses (each ranging from 1 to 7) to all 32 questions that address symptoms as a result of Crohn's disease: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function, and social function. Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.
Baseline and Week 8
Mean Change From the Baseline in IBDQ Subscale Scores After 8 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 8
The IBDQ has been frequently adopted in Japanese and overseas clinical assessments as a scale for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of subjects with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ includes 32 items, which are divided into four subscales: bowel symptoms, systemic symptoms, emotional function and social function, and each item is scored on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). Total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QOL.
Baseline and Week 8
Clinical Improvement Rate After 4 Weeks of Study Drug Administration
Time Frame: Week 4
Definition of clinical improvement: DAI subscore for rectal bleeding improved to 0 or 1 and DAI subscore for mucosal appearance improved by at least 1 point from baseline
Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2007

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 24, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colitis, Ulcerative

Clinical Trials on OPC-6535(Tetomilast)

3
Subscribe