Brief Intervention for Drug Abusing Adolescents

Brief Intervention for Drug Abusing Students

The purpose of this clinical trail is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief, cognitive-behavioral therapeutic intervention for adolescents reporting mild or moderate drug abuse (MMDA). This school-based initiative employs a collaborative effort between the University of Minnesota researchers and the St. Paul Public Schools. This intervention aims to reduce post-treatment drug use behaviors and enhance drug-use resistant cognitions and problem-solving skills.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Drug Abuse
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: brief intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy)

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical trail is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief, cognitive-behavioral therapeutic intervention for adolescents reporting mild or moderate drug abuse (MMDA). This school-based initiative employs a collaborative effort between the University of Minnesota researchers and the St. Paul Public Schools. This intervention aims to reduce post-treatment drug use behaviors and enhance drug-use resistant cognitions and problem-solving skills.

Specifically, we propose a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral therapy on key process and outcome dimensions among school-based youth with mild-to-moderate drug abuse (MMDA). The experimental treatment is designated Brief Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (BCBI) given its theoretical foundation in stage of change theory used to coordinate modules on Rational-Emotive Therapy and Problem Solving Therapy. BCBI will be compared against a second experimental treatment that consists of BCBI and a single parent session (BCBI+P) and an assessment only condition (control). The importance of clarifying mechanisms in drug treatment research will be explored with respect to a limited number of treatment and individual factors that have emerged as promising mediating and moderating factors, such as cognitive and problem solving factors, parenting practices, and peer group influences.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 160
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Minnesota
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55454
      • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 13 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. student at a local school
2. meets DSM-IV criteria for a substance abuse disorder for at least one drug
3. student and parent both agree to participate in the intervention study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. meets criteria for at least one DSM-IV substance dependence disorder
2. meets criteria for a psychotic disorder or a learning disability

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1; One arm was a 2-session brief intervention with both sessions involving only the adolescent. Each session was a 60 minute individual session with the counselor.	Behavioral: brief intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy); Consists of 60 minute individual sessions delivered with a therapist using a motivational interviewing (MI) style. Session 1 focuses on eliciting information about the students' substance use and related consequences based on the assessment, their perception of level of willingness to change, examining the cause and benefits of change using the decisional balance exercise, and discussing what goals for change the student would like to select and pursue. Session 2 reviewed the students' progress with the agreed upon goals, identifying high risk situations associated with clients difficulty in achieving the goals, discussing strategies to address barriers toward goal attainment, reviewing where the client is in the stage of change process, and negotiating either the continuation of goals or advancing to more ambitious goals of substance use reduction. Session 3 involved delivering the same MI interviewing style to the primary parent or guardian (student is not present).; Other Names: cognitive-behavioral therapy- motivational interviewing
Active Comparator: 2; The other arm was a 3-session brief intervention, with 2 sessions involving the adolescent and one session with the parent. Each of these individual sessions were 60 minutes.	Behavioral: brief intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy); Consists of 60 minute individual sessions delivered with a therapist using a motivational interviewing (MI) style. Session 1 focuses on eliciting information about the students' substance use and related consequences based on the assessment, their perception of level of willingness to change, examining the cause and benefits of change using the decisional balance exercise, and discussing what goals for change the student would like to select and pursue. Session 2 reviewed the students' progress with the agreed upon goals, identifying high risk situations associated with clients difficulty in achieving the goals, discussing strategies to address barriers toward goal attainment, reviewing where the client is in the stage of change process, and negotiating either the continuation of goals or advancing to more ambitious goals of substance use reduction. Session 3 involved delivering the same MI interviewing style to the primary parent or guardian (student is not present).; Other Names: cognitive-behavioral therapy- motivational interviewing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
Drug use frequency and quantity at 1-, 3- and 12-months post-intervention.	1 year post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
HIV and sexual risk behaviors at the same time period.	1 year post treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Minnesota
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Ken C Winters, Ph.D., University of Minnesota

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Piehler TF, Winters KC. Decision-making style and response to parental involvement in brief interventions for adolescent substance use. J Fam Psychol. 2017 Apr;31(3):336-346. doi: 10.1037/fam0000266. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: September 1, 2005
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 7, 2006
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 10, 2006
• First Posted (Estimate): July 11, 2006

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): October 20, 2008
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 16, 2008
• Last Verified: October 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: drug abuse
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Chemically-Induced Disorders; Substance-Related Disorders
• Other Study ID Numbers: 0308S51681