Study Evaluating Etanercept for the Treatment of Refractory Heel Enthesitis in Spondylarthropathy

A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of Etanercept in the Treatment of Adults Patients With Refractory Heel Enthesitis in Spondylarthropathy

To assess the efficacy and safety of Etanercept in patients with spondylarthropathy and refractory heel enthesitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Arles, France, 13200
      • Avignon, France, 84000
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
      • Grenoble, France, 38130
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
      • Nice, France, 6202
      • Orleans, France, 45032
      • Paris (Bichat), France, 75018
      • Paris (COCHIN), France, 75679
      • Paris (Pitie Salpetriere), France, 75651
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
      • Berlin, Germany, 12200
      • Herne, Germany, 446652
      • Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 HX

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Spondylarthropathy
  • Heel enthesitis refractory to standard treatment
  • Between 18 and 70 years of age
  • The patient global assessment of the disease activity (measured by a 100 mm VAS) must be >40 in the last 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of > 1 local steroid injection within 2 weeks of screening
  • Prior exposure to any TNF-inhibitor, including etanercept
  • Dose of NSAIDs changed within two weeks of study drug evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A
50 mg injection once weekly
Placebo Comparator: B
placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normalized Net Incremental Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA) Between Randomization and Week 12
Time Frame: 12 weeks
PGA was measured using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0=very good to 100=very bad. The normalized net incremental area under the curve of the PGA is the area between the baseline and the PGA curve as a function of time (week 2, 4, 8, 12). AUC was computed using the linear trapezoidal method. All the areas above the baseline and under the curve are positive and all the area below the baseline and above the curve are negative. The net incremental AUC is the sum of these areas. This result is then divided by the study duration of the patients. (negative value = improvement).
12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
The patient global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0=very good to 100=very bad. Change=12 week score minus baseline score. A negative score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive score indicates worsening.
Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Achieving a 50% Response on the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A response is defined as at least a 50% improvement (decrease) from baseline in the patient global assessment of disease activity. The patient global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0=very good to 100=very bad.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2010

Last Verified

July 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylarthropathies, Enthesitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe