Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Detection in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography

August 1, 2013 updated by: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

A Prospective Evaluation of Computer Aided Detection (CAD) in the NHS Breast Screening Programme [CADET II]

RATIONALE: A computer-aided detection program may help doctors find breast cancer sooner, when it may be easier to treat, in women undergoing screening mammography.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well computer-aided breast cancer detection works in women undergoing screening mammography.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare, prospectively, the breast cancer detection rate and recall rate of single reading using computer-aided detection vs standard double reading in women undergoing screening mammography.

OUTLINE: This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 screening arms.

  • Arm I (double reading): Screening mammograms are independently reviewed by two readers (i.e., radiologist or radiographer), each of whom reports on any abnormalities and decides whether a participant is recalled for further assessment or returned home to routine screening. In the event there is disagreement between the readers' findings, a third reader acts as an arbitrator by rendering an interpretation of the mammogram and making the final decision to recall the participant or return to routine screening.
  • Arm II (single reading with computer-aided detection [CAD]): Screening mammograms are reviewed initially by a single reader who reports on any abnormalities. The reader then re-examines the mammogram with the aid of CAD, a system that uses computer prompts to recall suspicious features or abnormalities that may have been overlooked or previously dismissed as being normal. Based on these evaluations, a recommendation is made by the reader to either recall the participant for further assessment or return home to routine screening. If there is a discrepancy between the reader's interpretation and the CAD findings, another reader may be consulted to review the mammogram.
  • Arm III (double reading followed by single reading with CAD): Screening mammograms are reviewed by double reading as in arm I followed by single reading with CAD as in arm II.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 30,000 participants will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • England
      • Coventry, England, United Kingdom, CV2 2DX
        • Walsgrave Hospital
      • Manchester, England, United Kingdom, M20 8LR
        • Withington Hospital
      • Nottingham, England, United Kingdom, NG5 1PB
        • Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust
    • Scotland
      • Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom, AB25 2ZN
        • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Currently undergoing 2-view mammography for routine breast cancer screening at any of the following participating National Health Services Breast Cancer Screening Program centers:

    • Manchester
    • Coventry
    • Nottingham
  • Hormone receptor status not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Female
  • Menopausal status not specified

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • Not specified

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Breast cancer detection rate
Recall rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Film reader performance using computer-aided detection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Fiona Gilbert, MD, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 22, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 2, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ABROIN-06-MRE01-14
  • CDR0000534404 (Registry Identifier: PDQ (Physician Data Query))
  • CRUK-CADET-II
  • ABROIN-CADET-II
  • EU-20709

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on comparison of screening methods

3
Subscribe