Experimental Prospective Study on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Implementation of Clinical Pathways (EPSEEIC2004)

August 20, 2007 updated by: Agenzia Regionale Sanitaria delle Marche
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of clinical pathways improves the quality of the hospital care of decompensated heart failure patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In Europe approximately 5% of all acute medical admissions relate to heart failure and in the United States heart failure is responsible for almost 1 million hospitalizations annually. Almost three quarters of these admissions are unplanned and worsening heart failure is responsible for half of these admissions.

The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) showed that the hospital treatment of heart failure frequently does not follow published guidelines or conform to the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) core performance measures, potentially contributing to the high morbidity, mortality and economic cost of this disorder. ADHERE findings also suggested that the wide variations in conformity may reflect differences in training, guideline familiarity, and implementation of tools and systems to ensure that recommended care is provided and documented. Consequently the development of educational and quality improvement programs has the potential to considerably reduce the current variability in care, enhance guideline adherence, and improve outcomes for patients.

Clinical pathways has become a popular tool to achieve such goals. Clinical pathways are a methodology for the mutual decision making and organization of care for a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period with the aim to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. They are also developed by multi-professional teams. Despite enthusiasm and diffusion, the widespread acceptance of clinical pathways remain questionable because very little prospective controlled data demonstrated their effectiveness.

The Experimental Prospective Study on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Implementation of Clinical Pathways was designed in order to conduct a rigorous evaluation of a clinical pathway in hospital treatment of decompensated heart failure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

424

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • principal diagnosis of heart failure (all ICD-9 codes included in 428.xx code)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
  • current unstable angina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Patients treated according to clinical pathways
Clinical pathways are a methodology for the mutual decision making and organization of care for a well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period with the aim to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. They are also developed by multi-professional teams
Other: 2
Patients treated according to usual care
Usual care is the current practice actually performed in the hospital

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: during the stay
during the stay

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Appropriateness of the stay; Rate of unscheduled readmissions; Length of the stay; Cost of the admission; Patients' satisfaction score; Use of diagnostic procedures; Use of medical treatments.
Time Frame: during the stay or at discharge
during the stay or at discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Andrea Gardini, MD, Agenzia Regionale Sanitaria delle Marche

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2007

Last Verified

August 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EPSEEIC2004-EXART12MARCHE

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Congestive Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Clinical Pathways

3
Subscribe