Study Evaluating Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide in Subjects With Painful Distal Diabetic Neuropathy.

August 29, 2023 updated by: UCB Pharma

A Multi-center, Open-label, follow-on Trial to Assess the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide in Subjects With Painful Distal Diabetic Neuropathy Including a Double-blind, Randomized Time Point Withdrawal Subtrial.

SP746 (NCT00546351) is a multi-center, open-label, follow-on trial. The purpose of this trial is to assess safety and tolerability of long-term exposure of lacosamide (previously referred to as SPM 927) in subjects with painful distal diabetic neuropathy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

621

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Wien, Austria
        • 180
      • Wien, Austria
        • 183
      • Antwerp, Belgium
        • 003
      • Bonheiden, Belgium
        • 006
      • Genk, Belgium
        • 002
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • 001
      • Merksem, Belgium
        • 005
      • Roeselare, Belgium
        • 004
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • 011
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • 014
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • 017
      • Ruse, Bulgaria
        • 019
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • 012
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • 013
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • 015
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • 016
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
        • 210
      • Varna, Bulgaria
        • 010
      • Brno, Czechia
        • 028
      • Chomutov, Czechia
        • 220
      • Litomerice, Czechia
        • 026
      • Olomouc, Czechia
        • 027
      • Ostrava-Poruba, Czechia
        • 024
      • Pisek, Czechia
        • 029
      • Praha 1, Czechia
        • 021
      • Praha 5, Czechia
        • 022
      • Kuopio, Finland
        • 192
      • Lisieux, France
        • 034
      • Nevers, France
        • 031
      • Bad Saarow, Germany
        • 040
      • Beckum, Germany
        • 052
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 049
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 051
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 056
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 242
      • Berlin, Germany
        • 249
      • Bochum, Germany
        • 247
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 041
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 045
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • 054
      • Jena, Germany
        • 244
      • Köthen, Germany
        • 058
      • Künzing, Germany
        • 043
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • 050
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • 053
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • 250
      • Mittweida, Germany
        • 046
      • München, Germany
        • 243
      • Schwerin, Germany
        • 246
      • Stuhr-Brinkum, Germany
        • 044
      • Witten, Germany
        • 248
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 060
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • 062
      • Győr, Hungary
        • 061
      • Kecskemét, Hungary
        • 262
      • Makó, Hungary
        • 260
      • Nyíregyháza, Hungary
        • 266
      • Szeged, Hungary
        • 064
      • Szolnok, Hungary
        • 264
      • Székesfehérvár, Hungary
        • 265
      • Tatabánya, Hungary
        • 263
      • Veszprém, Hungary
        • 261
      • Pavia, Italy
        • 270
      • Pavia, Italy
        • 273
      • Pozzilli, Italy
        • 272
      • Bialystok, Poland
        • 092
      • Bialystok, Poland
        • 293
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland
        • 094
      • Częstochowa, Poland
        • 095
      • Gdansk, Poland
        • 091
      • Gdansk, Poland
        • 093
      • Kraków, Poland
        • 294
      • Kraków, Poland
        • 297
      • Lodz, Poland
        • 090
      • Lodz, Poland
        • 295
      • Radom, Poland
        • 291
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • 292
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • 296
      • Ząbkowicki, Poland
        • 290
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • 100
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • 102
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • 107
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • 108
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • 109
      • Cluj-Napoca, Romania
        • 101
      • Timisoara, Romania
        • 103
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • 114
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • 115
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • 116
      • Samara, Russian Federation
        • 111
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • 112
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • 140
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • 143
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • 144
      • Nis, Serbia
        • 142
      • Granada, Spain
        • 137
      • Bath, United Kingdom
        • 159
      • Bristol, United Kingdom
        • 154
      • Leeds, United Kingdom
        • 152
      • Morriston, United Kingdom
        • 150
      • Newport, United Kingdom
        • 151

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who completed Study SP743 (NCT00238524) or SP874 (NCT00350103) and, in the investigator's opinion, might benefit from long-term administration of SP746 (NCT00546351). Exception: subjects who prematurely discontinued
  • SP743 (NCT00238524) or SP874 (NCT00350103) due to lack of efficacy or due to intolerability to trial medication (after Visit 5but prior to entering the Maintenance Phase) may be eligible to participate in SP746 (NCT00546351), after consultation with the medical monitor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has clinically relevant ECG abnormalities, or a QTc interval ≥500 ms, and/or a QTc interval increase of ≥60 ms from the mean pre-dose QTc value at Visit 2 of SP743 (NCT00238524) or SP874 (NCT00350103)
  • Subject has aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥3 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) with total bilirubin ≥2 times ULN or transaminases (AST and/or ALT) ≥5 times ULN
  • Subject has a clinically relevant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, jeopardizes or compromises the subject's ability to participate in this trial
  • Subject is a pregnant or nursing female, or is of childbearing potential and is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or does not practice 2 combined methods of contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lacosamide
50 to 100 mg Lacosamide film-coated tablets; two times per day up to 600 mg/day; 6.5 years.
50 to 100 mg Lacosamide film-coated tablets; two times per day up to 600 mg/day; 6.5 years
Other Names:
  • Vimpat

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Experiencing the Occurrence of at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Evaluation Period From Entry Visit 1 Through End of Treatment (Approximately 6.5 Years).
Time Frame: From entry Visit 1 through end of treatment (approximately 6.5 years)
Adverse events are any untoward medical occurrences in a subject administered study treatment, whether or not these events are related to treatment.
From entry Visit 1 through end of treatment (approximately 6.5 years)
Number of Participants Experiencing the Occurrence of at Least One Serious Adverse Event (SAE) During the Evaluation Period From Entry Visit 1 Through End of Treatment (Approximately 6.5 Years).
Time Frame: From entry Visit 1 through end of treatment (approximately 6.5 years)

A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose:

  • Is fatal
  • Is life-threatening
  • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
  • Requires inpatient hospitalization
  • Prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization
  • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect
  • Is considered to be an important medical event. Such an event may not be immediately life threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the subject or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definitions above
From entry Visit 1 through end of treatment (approximately 6.5 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Daily Pain Score Using an 11-point Likert Scale (0-10) at Baseline Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline
On the Likert Scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain.
Baseline
Average Daily Pain Score Using an 11-point Likert Scale (0-10) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
On the Likert Scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain.
Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Average Pain Score as Measured by a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain.
Baseline
Average Pain Score as Measured by a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
On VAS 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = worst possible pain.
Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit (approximately 2 years)

The PGIC is a 7-point self-administered categorical rating scale in which the subject rated the change in pain since starting trial medication (from much worse [score of 1] to much better [score of 7]).

Reported results are presented as Better (sum of mildly, moderately, or much better), No Change, or Worse (sum of mildly, moderately, or much worse).

Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Intensity at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Sharpness at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not sharp and 10 = most sharp sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Heat at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not hot and 10 = the most hot sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Cold at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not cold and 10 = the coldest sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Dullness at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not dull and 10 = most dull sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Unpleasantness at Final Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not unpleasant and 10 = most unpleasant sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Surface Pain at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = no surface pain and 10 = most intense surface pain imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Deep Pain at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = no deep pain and 10 = most intense deep pain imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Itchiness at Final Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not itchy and 10 = most itchy sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Within-Subject Change in Neuropathic Pain Using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) - Sensitivity at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
0 = not sensitive and 10 = most sensitive sensation imaginable.
Baseline Visit; Last Visit (approximately 2 years)
Average Pain Interference With Sleep (11-point Likert Scale) at Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline
0 = no interference with sleep and 10 = worst possible interference with sleep.
Baseline
Average Pain Interference With Sleep (11-point Likert Scale) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit
0 = no interference with sleep and 10 = worst possible interference with sleep.
Last Visit
Average Pain Interference With Activity (11-point Likert Scale) at Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline
0 = no interference with activity and 10 = worst possible interference with activity.
Baseline
Average Pain Interference With Activity (11-point Likert Scale) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit
0 = no interference with activity and 10 = worst possible interference with activity.
Last Visit
Average Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Health Survey - Physical Component Summary (PCS) at Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline
The SF-36 Health Survey measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS = physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS = vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0 = worst score (or quality of life) and 100 = best score.
Baseline
Average Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Health Survey - Physical Component Summary (PCS) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit
The SF-36 Health Survey measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS = physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS = vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0 = worst score (or quality of life) and 100 = best score.
Last Visit
Average Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Health Survey - Mental Component Summary (MCS) at Baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline
The SF-36 Health Survey measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS = physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS = vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0 = worst score (or quality of life) and 100 = best score.
Baseline
Average Quality of Life Using the SF-36 Health Survey - Mental Component Summary (MCS) at Last Visit.
Time Frame: Last Visit
The SF-36 Health Survey measures health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. It has 36 questions with 8 subscale scores and 2 summary scores: PCS = physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; MCS = vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. For both, 0 = worst score (or quality of life) and 100 = best score.
Last Visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: UCB Clinical Trial Call Center, +1 877 822 9493 (UCB)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

October 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on Lacosamide

3
Subscribe