Cost/Effectiveness Analysis of the Respiratory Poligraphy at Home (Telesleep)

April 19, 2016 updated by: Juan F. Masa, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica

Diagnostic Validity Study and Cost Analysis of Domiciliary Respiratory

The abbreviated diagnostic sleep studies (RP), made at home and transferred telematically to the sleep laboratory, are useful for the diagnosis of sleep apnea and due to a lower cost, it could be an alternative to conventional polysomnography. Objectives: 1) Usefulness of domiciliary study evaluated by percentage of patients diagnosed of SAHS compared with PSG and agreement in the therapeutic decision. 2) Direct costs of patients included in the study. Design: controlled, randomized, crossed and blind (320 patients) comparing PR made at home with PSG, in patients suspicious of SAHS. The equipment transfer will be made by a transport agency from home to home in order to be universal the access to this diagnostic model. The file transmission with the raw data of the study will be made telematically by GPRS. If the aims of the study reach an end there will be a considerable change in the clinical practice making possible the international acceptation of domiciliary PR as diagnosis of SAHS and adapting the diagnosis of this syndrome to the new technologies of communication. The universalization of domiciliary PR would make possible that the diagnosis of SAHS could be done in any patient and in any country with GPRS technology and a transport agency, that is to say in all developed countries. As sleep apneas affect 5-7 million persons in Spain and there is association between sleep apneas and cardiovascular risk, in the immediate future we must evaluate this disease as we do today with the cholesterol determination. If our results are as predicted, the primary care physician could start and in a lot of cases finish the SAHS diagnostic process. This would simplify remarkably the diagnosis of SAHS and would alleviate a lot the process cost all over the world.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Caceres, Spain, 10003
        • Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara. Servicio Extremeño de Salud

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 and 70 years.
  2. Without clinical suspicion referred to any other sleep pathology susceptible of presenting daytime sleepiness.
  3. Living 20 Km or more far from the hospital participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Psychophysical incapacity to answer questionnaires.
  2. Patients who do not get pass the proof of placing the PR (see below).
  3. Patients who present restrictive chronic disease previously diagnosed (neoplasy, any origin chronic pain, renal failure, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and any other limited chronic disease)
  4. Structural cardiopaty or coronary documented non controlled by means of medical treatment .
  5. Toxicomanies. Alcoholism (more than 80 gr/day in men and 60 gr/day in women.
  6. Informed consent not obtained.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PSG
POLYSOMNOGRAPHY
Experimental: PR
respiratory polygraphy: level III of AASM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Effectiveness of the two diagnostic models (PR at home and PSG) evaluated by means of percentage of patients who have established the diagnosis of SAHS and agreement in the therapeutic decision.
Time Frame: at the end of the study
at the end of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Direct and indirect cost of patients included in the study.
Time Frame: at the end of the study
at the end of the study
Relationship cost/efficacy
Time Frame: at the end of study
at the end of study
Number of non valid studies in each group
Time Frame: at the end of study
at the end of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suspected Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on PR (respiratory polygraphy)

3
Subscribe