Evaluation of the Efficacy of Varenicline on Cognition, Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics in Subjects With Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

October 12, 2011 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase 2 Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial of Varenicline Tartrate (CP-526,555) in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

  1. Assess the efficacy of varenicline, relative to placebo, on a performance based measure of cognition in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease
  2. Evaluate the effects of varenicline on clinically relevant measures including attention and executive function, behavior, and clinician rated global change.
  3. Evaluate the safety and tolerability of varenicline, relative to placebo, in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease
  4. Evaluate the pharmacokinetics of varenicline in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 602-715
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 700-721
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 400-711
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 138-736
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 136-705
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 158-710
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 443-721
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Gyunggido
      • Seongnam, Gyunggido, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females, age 55-85
  • Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease, consistent with criteria from both: 1) National Institute of Neurological and Communicable Disease and Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) and 2) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV)
  • Mini-mental status exam score of 14-26 inclusive
  • Rosen-Modified Hachinski Ischemia Score of < or = 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis or history of other dementia or neurodegenerative disorders
  • Diagnosis or history of clinically significant cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease
  • Subjects with pulmonary disease or evidence of clinically significant pulmonary symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo once daily for 1 week followed by placebo twice daily for 5 weeks.
EXPERIMENTAL: Varenicline
0.5 mg once daily for 1 week followed by 0.5 mg twice daily for 1 week followed by 1 mg twice daily for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Chantix, Champix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 75 (ADAS-Cog 75) at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
12-item scale to assess severity of cognitive impairment in AD. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, remembering test instructions, and concentration/distractibility. Total score range from 0-75 with 75 indicating worse cognition.
Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 75 (ADAS-Cog 75) at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
12-item scale to assess severity of cognitive impairment in AD. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, remembering test instructions, and concentration/distractibility. Total score range from 0-75 with 75 indicating worse cognition.
Week 3
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
11-item scale designed to assess the severity of cognitive impairments in AD subjects. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and remembering test instructions. Total score range from 0-70 with 70 indicating worse cognition.
Week 3
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 70 (ADAS-Cog 70) at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
11-item scale designed to assess the severity of cognitive impairments in AD subjects. Items include word recall, naming objects and fingers, following commands, constructional praxis, ideational praxis, orientation, word recognition, spoken language ability, comprehension of spoken language, word finding difficulty in spontaneous speech, and remembering test instructions. Total score range from 0-70 with 70 indicating worse cognition.
Week 6
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Week 6
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
Caregiver interview-based rating scale assessing 12 behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behavior, appetite/eating, and sleep. Each symptom score derived by frequency of symptoms * severity of symptoms (range 0-12). Total score = sum of symptom scores; range: 0-144 with higher score indicating greater behavioral disturbances.
Week 3
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Caregiver interview-based rating scale assessing 12 behavioral disturbances occurring in dementia: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behavior, appetite/eating, and sleep. Each symptom score derived by frequency of symptoms * severity of symptoms (range 0-12). Total score = sum of symptom scores; range: 0-144 with higher score indicating greater behavioral disturbances.
Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Detection at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain psychomotor function through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 30 trials; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average of the log10 t transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds (log10 [5000]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Detection at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain psychomotor function through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 30 trials; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average of the log10 t transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds (log10 [5000]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Detection at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain psychomotor function through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 30 trials; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average of the log10 t transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds (log10 [5000]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual episodic memory (associate learning) through responses within 7 minutes to 4 targets x 4 rounds (mild AD) or 3 targets x 4 rounds (moderate AD); score range: 35 to 100. Performance variable: number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location four times.
Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual episodic memory (associate learning) through responses within 7 minutes to 4 targets x 4 rounds (mild AD) or 3 targets x 4 rounds (moderate AD); score range: 35 to 100. Performance variable: number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location four times.
Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL) at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual episodic memory (associate learning) through responses within 7 minutes to 4 targets x 4 rounds (mild AD) or 3 targets x 4 rounds (moderate AD); score range: 35 to 100. Performance variable: number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location four times.
Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: One Back Working Memory at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: One Back Working Memory at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: One Back Working Memory at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain working memory through yes or no responses to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Visual Learning at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain episodic memory through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 4 targets repeated among 6 distractors on 4 rounds (mild Alzheimer's disease [AD], or 3 targets repeated among 4 distractors on 4 rounds (moderate AD) ; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Visual Learning at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain episodic memory through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 4 targets repeated among 6 distractors on 4 rounds (mild Alzheimer's disease [AD], or 3 targets repeated among 4 distractors on 4 rounds (moderate AD) ; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Visual Learning at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain episodic memory through yes or no responses within 5 minutes to 4 targets repeated among 6 distractors on 4 rounds (mild Alzheimer's disease [AD], or 3 targets repeated among 4 distractors on 4 rounds (moderate AD) ; score range: 0 to 1.57. Performance variable: accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of proportion correct responses.
Week 6
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Identification at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual attention through a yes or no response to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds ( log10 [5000]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Week 1
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Identification at Week 3
Time Frame: Week 3
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual attention through a yes or no response to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds ( log10 [5000]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Week 3
Computerized Test Battery for Cognition (CogState) Tasks: Identification at Week 6
Time Frame: Week 6
Assessment of the cognitive domain visual attention through a yes or no response to 30 trials within 5 minutes; score range: 0 to 3.69. Performance variable: speed of performance; average log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses. Reaction times longer than 5 seconds ( log10 [5000]) were excluded as reflecting responses that were abnormally slow.
Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 1, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 22, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2011

Last Verified

October 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Varenicline

3
Subscribe