- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00780741
Immediate Office Probing vs Deferred Facility Probing for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 6 to <10 Months Old (NLD3)
A Randomized Trial Comparing Immediate Probing in an Office Setting With Deferred Probing in a Facility Setting for Treatment of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 6 to <10 Months Old
The purpose of this study is:
To determine the cost-effectiveness of treating NLDO using immediate office probing compared with deferred probing in a facility setting. As part of the primary objective, the study will determine the proportion of eyes experiencing spontaneous resolution among subjects randomized to the deferred probing group.
The secondary objectives are:
- To determine the success proportion for eyes undergoing immediate office probing as an initial procedure.
- To determine the success proportion for eyes undergoing deferred facility probing as an initial procedure.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is a common ocular condition in the first year of life. Many cases will resolve spontaneously or with massage. Many studies of primary treatment of NLDO have been reported, however these case series have largely been retrospective, uncontrolled, and conducted in single centers. The substantial uncertainty regarding an estimate of spontaneous resolution is a primary reason for conducting the current study.
Probing is the most widely-used initial treatment for NLDO in infancy. Our group recently completed a prospective observational study which found a 78% success proportion of probing among children aged 6 to <12 months. Other estimates of the success rate for probing vary between 69% and 92%.
Two differing approaches to nasolacrimal probing have been most often been used: (1) immediate office probing (early probing - generally soon after 6 months of age) and (2) medical management (episodic antibiotic eye drops with massage of the lacrimal sac) until 9-13 months of age followed by probing under general anesthesia or conscious sedation (deferred probing). The advantages of early probing are the avoidance of general anesthesia or conscious sedation, immediate resolution of symptoms, fewer physician visits, fewer antibiotic prescriptions, lesser cost per procedure, and possible prevention of fibrosis from inflammation in the nasolacrimal duct. The advantages of deferred probing include more subject comfort with the procedure and possible avoidance of a surgical procedure completely.
The optimal approach to the management of NLDO in the first year of life remains uncertain. Our prospective observational data suggest a slightly reduced chance of success with immediate office probing (75% for office probing, 80% for facility probing), however, immediate office probing may be more cost-effective even if the proportion with success is lower. For a subject undergoing a single operation, immediate office probing is less expensive than deferred probing in a facility because there is no fee for anesthesia, the facility, or for medications prescribed during the pre-operative observation period. Some portion of this lower cost would be offset however by the additional cost of a second procedure if the initial office probing is not successful. Deferred facility probing is more expensive per procedure; however, the overall costs are reduced by the number of children whose NLDO spontaneously resolves while waiting to perform the procedure in a facility.
The study is a randomized clinical trial which aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of treating NLDO using immediate office probing compared with deferred probing in a facility setting. As part of the primary objective, the study will determine the proportion of eyes experiencing spontaneous resolution among subjects randomized to the deferred probing group.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Idaho
-
Boise, Idaho, United States, 83702
- Intermountain Eye Centers
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 6 to <10 months
- Onset of NLDO symptoms and/or signs prior to 6 months chronological age in study eye(s)
- Presence in study eye(s) of epiphora, increased tear film, and/or mucous discharge in the absence of an upper respiratory infection or an ocular surface irritation that investigator believes is due to NLDO
- At least one open punctum present in study eye(s)
A history of NLDO treatment with lacrimal massage, topical antibiotics or steroids, or systemic antibiotics is permitted.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of nasolacrimal duct surgery including probing, nasolacrimal intubation, balloon catheter dilation, or dacryocystorhinostomy in study eye(s) History of trauma to the lacrimal drainage system of the study eye(s)
- Glaucoma in study eye(s)
- Corneal surface disease in study eye(s)
- Microphthalmia in study eye(s)
- Down Syndrome
- Craniosynostosis
- Goldenhar sequence
- Clefting syndromes
- Hemifacial microsomia
- Midline facial anomalies
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Immediate Office Probing
Probing to be performed in the office setting using topical anesthesia and infant restraint.
Probing to be performed either the same day as randomization or within two weeks.
|
Nasolacrimal duct probing in an office setting with topical anesthesia and restraint of the infant.
|
Active Comparator: Deferred Facility Probing
Probing to be performed in a surgical facility under general anesthesia within four weeks after completion of the 26-week visit if any of the clinical signs persist.
|
Nasolacrimal duct probing performed under general anesthesia in a hospital outpatient surgery center or an ambulatory surgery center.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of Participants With Treatment Success
Time Frame: 18 months of age
|
Absence of three clinical signs of NLDO (epiphora, increased tear lake, and mucous discharge) upon masked examination at 18 months of age.
|
18 months of age
|
Cost of Treatment
Time Frame: Randomization to 18 months of age
|
Total cost of treatment including the cost of an initial office consultation and all surgeries received (i.e. initial surgeries and reoperations) and medications prescribed for NLDO between randomization and the 18 months of age visit.
Estimates of treatment costs were obtained primarily from the 2011 Medicare Fee Schedules.
|
Randomization to 18 months of age
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Months of Symptoms of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (NLDO) Between Randomization and 18 Months of Age
Time Frame: Randomization to 18 months of age.
|
Months of NLDO symptoms between randomization and 18 months of age.
When resolution of NLDO occurred without surgery, the time of resolution was estimated as the midpoint between randomization and the first time point at which symptoms/signs were reported as absent (i.e.
3-month phone call, 6-month visit, or 18 months of age visit) without a subsequent report of symptoms/signs.
For patients who underwent successful surgery, months of symptoms was estimated as months between randomization and the surgery.
Patients who had clinical signs present at the 18 month of age visit were considered to have had symptoms present since randomization.
|
Randomization to 18 months of age.
|
Proportion of Deferred Facility Probing Group Participants With 6-Month Resolution of NLDO Without Surgery
Time Frame: Randomization to 6 months
|
Absence of three clinical signs of NLDO (epiphora, increased tear lake, and mucous discharge) upon unmasked examination 6 months after randomization.
Participants who were operated before the 6-month visit were considered treatment failures.
|
Randomization to 6 months
|
Proportion of Participants With Office Probing Success 6 Months After Randomization
Time Frame: Randomization to 6 months
|
The proportion of immediate office group participants whose office probing was successful when assessed 6 months after randomization.
Office probing success was defined as absence of three clinical signs of NLDO (epiphora, increased tear lake, and mucous discharge) 6 months after randomization and no reoperation.
|
Randomization to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Katherine A. Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Intermountain Eye Centers
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nonsurgical management. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;130(6):730-4. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.454.
- Lee KA, Chandler DL, Repka MX, Melia M, Beck RW, Summers CG, Frick KD, Foster NC, Kraker RT, Atkinson S; PEDIG. A comparison of treatment approaches for bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;156(5):1045-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
- Miller AM, Chandler DL, Repka MX, Hoover DL, Lee KA, Melia M, Rychwalski PJ, Silbert DI; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Beck RW, Crouch ER 3rd, Donahue S, Holmes JM, Quinn GE, Sala NA, Schloff S, Wallace DK, Foster NC, Frick KD, Golden RP, Lambert SR, Tien DR, Weakley DR Jr. Office probing for treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in infants. J AAPOS. 2014 Feb;18(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.10.016.
- Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial comparing the cost-effectiveness of 2 approaches for treating unilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;130(12):1525-33. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.2853.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NEI-142
- 2U10EY011751 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownCongenital Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionEgypt
-
Menoufia UniversityCompletedPrimary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesUnknownCongenital Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyBausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedCongenital Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionUnited States
-
Western Galilee Hospital-NahariyaUnknownAcquired Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionIsrael
-
Cathay General HospitalCompletedCongenital Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionTaiwan
-
Mansoura UniversityNot yet recruitingPatient With Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction | External Dacryocystorhinostomy OperationEgypt
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedNasolacrimal Duct ObstructionCanada
-
University Hospital OstravaCompletedNasolacrimal Duct ObstructionCzech Republic
-
Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de ValencianaRecruitingDacryocystorhinostomy | Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionMexico
Clinical Trials on Immediate Office Probing
-
University Hospital, ToursRecruitingPeriodontal DiseasesFrance
-
University of ArkansasWithdrawnMeibomian Gland DysfunctionUnited States
-
Texas Tech University Health Sciences CenterWithdrawnCardiovascular Diseases | Periodontal Diseases
-
University of CagliariNot yet recruiting
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesUnknownCongenital Nasolacrimal Duct ObstructionIran, Islamic Republic of
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedImplant-abutment Connection | Microleakage | Short ImplantTurkey
-
Mansour AsseryUnknownPeri-Implantitis | Dental Implant Failed
-
Saint-Joseph UniversityEnrolling by invitationPeri-Implantitis | Implant ExpulsionLebanon
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown