Clinical Evaluation of the Long-Term Effects of Contact Lens Care Systems

June 18, 2018 updated by: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
The purpose of this study is to compare two marketed contact lens care solutions in regards to comfort and ocular health.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

473

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Birmingham
      • Aston Triangle, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    • Arkansas
      • North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
    • California
      • Campbell, California, United States
      • Cupertino, California, United States
      • Laguna Niguel, California, United States
      • Mission Viejo, California, United States
      • San Clemente, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
    • Illinois
      • Bloomington, Illinois, United States
    • Kansas
      • Neodesha, Kansas, United States
    • Missouri
      • Raytown, Missouri, United States
      • Warrensburg, Missouri, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Florence, New Jersey, United States
    • Ohio
      • Chagrin Falls, Ohio, United States
      • Warren, Ohio, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Moon, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, United States
      • State College, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Rhode Island
      • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
    • South Dakota
      • Chamberlain, South Dakota, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States
    • Virginia
      • Midlothian, Virginia, United States
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 18 years old.
  • Signed Informed Consent and Investigator to record this on Case Report Form (CRF) in appropriate space.
  • Require a visual correction in both eyes (monovision allowed but not monofit).
  • Have a contact lens spherical distance requirement between +6.00D and -9.00D in both eyes.
  • Astigmatism of 1.00D or less in the better eye and 1.50D or less in the other eye.
  • Be correctable to a visual acuity of 20/30 (6/9) or better in each eye.
  • Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Requires concurrent ocular medication.
  • Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of which would affect vision or successful lens wear.
  • Clinically significant corneal edema, corneal vascularisation, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar injection or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Worn lenses on an extended wear basis in the last 3 months.
  • Diabetic.
  • Infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
  • Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or rigid gas-permeable (RGP) lens wear in the previous 8 weeks.
  • Has had refractive surgery. Has had eye injury/surgery within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrolment for this study.
  • Abnormal lacrimal secretions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: 02Optix CL and ReNu MPS with SICS
O2Optix contact lens and ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution
control contact lens to be worn daily for approximately 7 months for entire length of study.
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
OTHER: Proclear CL and ReNu MPS with SICS
Proclear contact lens and ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
control contact lens to be worn for entire length of study.
OTHER: 02Optix CL and Clear Care LCS with SICS
O2Optix contact lens and Clear Care lens care solution subject
control contact lens to be worn daily for approximately 7 months for entire length of study.
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
OTHER: Proclear CL and Clear Care LCS with SICS
Proclear contact lens and Clear Care lens care solution
control contact lens to be worn for entire length of study.
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
OTHER: 02Optix CL and ReNu MPS without SICS
O2Optix contact lens and ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution
control contact lens to be worn daily for approximately 7 months for entire length of study.
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
OTHER: Proclear CL and ReNu MPS without SICS
Proclear contact lens and ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
control contact lens to be worn for entire length of study.
OTHER: 02Optix CL and Clear Care LCS without SICS
O2Optix contact lens and Clear Care lens care solution
control contact lens to be worn daily for approximately 7 months for entire length of study.
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection
OTHER: Proclear CL and Clear Care LCS without SICS
Proclear contact lens and Clear Care lens care solution
control contact lens to be worn for entire length of study.
lens solution for overnight lens disinfection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Daily Wear Time
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Average hours per day that contact lens were worn.
24 weeks
Average Daily Comfortable Wear Time
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Average hours per day that contact lens were worn comfortably.
24 weeks
Lens Comfort
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Lens comfort at time of month 6 visit, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10=excellent.
24 weeks
Frequency of Eye Discomfort
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Subjective measure of typical daily eye discomfort reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
24 weeks
Frequency of Daily Lens Dryness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Subjective measure of typical daily contact lens dryness reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
24 weeks
Frequency of Eye Burning/Stinging
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Subjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
24 weeks
Frequency of Itching
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Subjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
24 weeks
Frequency of Tearing
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Subjective measure of typical daily tearing related to lens wear reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
24 weeks
Average Corneal Fluorescein Type Staining
Time Frame: 24 weeks
staining measured over five sectors of the cornea and classified as a type of staining on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Micropunctate, 2=Macropunctate, 3=Coalesced Macropunctate, 4=Patch.
24 weeks
Average Corneal Fluorescein Staining Area
Time Frame: 24 weeks
corneal staining measured over 5 areas, averaged, and graded as a single score average on a scale of 0 to 10, 0=0%, 1=10%, 2=20%, 3=30%, 4=40%, 5=50%, 6=60%, 7=70%, 8=80%, 9=90%, 10=100%.
24 weeks
Limbal Redness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Redness at the transition zone between the white of the eye and the clear window of the eye, the cornea, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
24 weeks
Bulbar Redness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Redness of the blood vessels in the tissues overlaying the white of the eye, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
24 weeks
Lower Tarsal Redness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Redness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the lower eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
24 weeks
Upper Tarsal Redness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Redness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the upper eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
24 weeks
Tarsal Roughness
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The roughness of the inner lining of the eyelids, measured on a 0 to 7 scale. 0=Smooth, 1=Slightly uneven, 2=Uneven surface, 3=Uneven surface with loss of transparency & superficial vessels, 4=Small papillae, poor transparency, 5=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, no transparency, 6=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, vessels inside papillae, 7=Large papillae
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensity of Physiological Outcomes
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible to "Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS)". These measures are related to intensity of outcomes, i.e. discomfort, burning, dryness, etc. with lower scores being better on a scale of 1-5.
24 weeks
Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing Time
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for "Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS)". Average wearing time and average comfortable wearing time.
24 weeks
Physiological Responses
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for "Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS)". Physiological findings are done through a slit lamp examination and are known as biomicroscopy measurements. Measures are given in terms of average score with a minimum of zero and a worse grade the higher the value with a range of 0 to 4, (tarsal roughness is 0-7 scale).
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CR-4522

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on O2Optix contact lens

3
Subscribe