Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

September 21, 2021 updated by: Loma Linda University

Randomized Controlled Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Patients with liver tumor burden that exceeds Milan criteria are considered to receive one of the following locoregional treatments: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection and proton beam radiation (PBR). The goals of these treatments are to control tumor growth, to downstage tumor size to meet Milan criteria, and to improve survival. Patients who exceed the Milan criteria benefit from tumor downstaging as a result of treatment. Patients who meet Milan criteria benefit from tumor control to bridge them to liver transplantation. TACE is considered the most common locoregional treatment that is used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton beam radiotherapy has been used in treating HCC in a few centers across the globe. Phase I and II trials showed a satisfactory safety and efficacy results. Loma Linda University Medical Center is one of these pioneering centers that use proton beam as a treatment for HCC. This is the first randomized trial in the medical field that will compare head-to-head the efficacy of TACE versus proton beam in treating HCC patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients are candidates to receive both proton beam and TACE
  2. Patients with no evidence of metastasis or macrovascular invasion
  3. Patients with tumor burden that meets San Francisco criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who are candidates for surgical resection
  2. Patients with lesion < 2 cm
  3. Patients who have contraindication to receive either TACE or proton
  4. Patients with serum alpha fetoprotein > 500
  5. Patients with metastasis or macrovascular invasion
  6. Patients treated previously for HCC by any locoregional treatment
  7. Patients with prior liver transplant
  8. Patients with Child class C
  9. Patients with MELD score of > 25
  10. Patients with other comorbid diseases that may impact survival
  11. Patients with ongoing alcohol intake
  12. Patients with active sepsis
  13. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within a week
  14. Patients unwilling to sign informed consent form
  15. Patients with history of noncompliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Transarterial Chemoembolization
Application of carboplatin, doxorubicin in ethiodol into the artery for one or more sessions.
Other Names:
  • (TACE)
Active Comparator: Proton Beam Radiotherapy
Fifteen consecutive sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: lifetime
lifetime

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to progression
Time Frame: Lifetime
Lifetime
Downstaging
Time Frame: Lifetime
Lifetime

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael deVera, MD, Loma Linda University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 7, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Clinical Trials on Transarterial Chemoembolization

3
Subscribe