Effects of Different Mode of Exercise Training on Type 2 Diabetes

February 8, 2017 updated by: Singapore General Hospital

Differential Effects of Aerobic Versus Progressive Resistance Training on Metabolic Profile and Fitness in Older Adults With Diabetes Mellitus - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized study on the comparison between aerobic training versus progressive resistance training over a 2 months period for older adults with type 2 diabetes. The hypothesis is that progressive resistance training is just as effective as aerobic training on Hba1c and could be an alternative training for those older diabetic patients who cannot participate in aerobic exercise.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many studies have shown the importance of aerobic training with respect to management of diabetes. However adoption of aerobic activities may be challenging for some individuals with diabetes, especially the elderly and the obese. There is increasing interest in resistance training and no study have looked at direct comparison between the two.

Subjects with diabetes but is generally sedentary (determined by means of a questionnaire) were recruited and randomized in one of the two groups. Subjects are supervised in a group and a completer is defined as one who completed 18 sessions within 8 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169608
        • Singapore General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 50 years and above,
  • Hba1c between 8 to 10 % in the past one month,
  • sedentary,
  • able to continuously walk for at least 20 minutes and climbed one flight of stairs unaided without stopping were eligible for participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with Hba1c more than 10% or if escalation of treatment of glycemic control or dyslipidemia was likely to be necessary over the 2 months training period period,
  • congestive cardiac failure, unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction within the last one year,
  • proliferative diabetic retinopathy,
  • uncontrolled hypertension,
  • advanced arthritis likely to limit mobility or participation in prescribed exercises,
  • respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive lung disease,
  • significant proteinuria or chronic renal insufficiency,
  • received drugs for the treatment of obesity or very low caloric diet (VLCD, less than 1000 kcal/ day),
  • renal disease and
  • inability to monitor glucose level or comply with exercise program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aerobic Training
50 minutes of aerobic training, 18 sessions within 2 months period
18 sessions over 2 months period. Each session consist of 50 minutes of aerobic training at 65-70 % of maximum predicted heart rate
Other Names:
  • Treadmill
  • Cross trainer
  • Cycling
Experimental: Progressive Resistance Training
50 minutes of progressive resistance training consisting of nine resistance exercises, each conducted 3 sets of 10 repetitions. 18 sessions over 2 months period.
18 sessions completed in 2 months. each session consists of 50 minutes of resistance training which is made up of 3 sets of 10 repetitions of nine resistive exercises using machines and free weights at 65-70% of 1-repetitive maximum.
Other Names:
  • Weight training
  • Circuit training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated (Hba1c). Measuring unit: percentage
Time Frame: 2 months
Blood was drawn from each subject who fasted at least 10 hours overnight. Hba1c (%) was measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC Variant II Bio Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). Change in Hba1c before and after intervention were looked at.
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak volume of oxygen consumed (VO2peak) or fitness level. Measuring unit: ml/kg/min
Time Frame: 2 months
Modified Bruce protocol on a treadmill using Cosmed K4B2 machine to measure
2 months
Anthropometric measurements
Time Frame: 2 months
weight (kilogram), height (metres), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (centimeters) and body fat (percentage). Measurements to be taken before and after intervention.
2 months
Cholesterol
Time Frame: 2 months
Blood was drawn from each subject who fasted at least 10 hours overnight. Total cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) were measured using enzymatic colorimetric methods with cholesterol oxidase-peroxidase amino phenazone phenol and glycerol-3-phospahte oxidase-peroxidase amino phenazone phenol. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was measured using homogenous enzymatic colorimetric assay. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated using the Friedewald formula.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Li Whye Cindy Ng, Singapore General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 23, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Aerobic Training

3
Subscribe