Impact of Enhanced Health Facility Care in Uganda

October 31, 2013 updated by: Sarah Staedke, Uganda Malaria Surveillance Project

Evaluating the Impact of Enhanced Health Facility-based Care for Malaria and Febrile Illnesses in Children in Tororo, Uganda

The investigators propose to assess whether an intervention to build capacity and improve delivery of drugs and diagnostics at government-run health facilities improves the health of children and quality of care delivered, as compared to 'standard care' currently available at health facilities, supplemented by services provided through the private sector and community-based interventions. The target population will be divided into 20 clusters, defined as the catchment area of lower-level public health facilities. Clusters will be randomized to the health facility intervention (HFI) or to standard care delivered from government-run health facilities, supplemented by services provided through the private sector and community-based interventions. The intervention is designed to address barriers to delivering quality care at health centers and will focus on three components: (1) training in-charges in health center management, (2) providing training to health workers in fever case management and patient-centered services, and (3) ensuring adequate supplies of artemether-lumefantrine and RDTs. Outcomes will be measured in three distinct populations: (1) cross-sectional surveys of children under 15 years randomly selected from households within the clusters; (2) a cohort of children under five randomly selected from households within the clusters and followed for 2 years; and (3) patients attending all government-run health facilities, including children under five and their caregivers participating in exit interviews on selected days every six months. The primary outcome of the study is prevalence of anemia in children under five.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study overview:

We are proposing to evaluate enhanced health facility-based care for malaria and febrile illnesses in children in Tororo district using a cluster randomized design. The health facility intervention (HFI) will aim to address barriers to achieving good quality health care that were identified in our formative research. The focus of our intervention will be providing RDTs and training health workers in management of both malaria and non-malarial febrile illnesses.

Study site:

The study will be conducted in Tororo district, an area with very high malaria transmission intensity. The estimated entomologic inoculation rate (EIR) in Tororo is 562 infective bites per person-year, and the prevalence of parasitemia among children aged 5-9 years is 63.5%. The five sub-counties of West Budama North Health Sub-district (Nagongera, Paya, Kirewa, Kisoko, and Petta), and two sub-counties of West Budama South Health Sub-district (Mulanda and Rubongi) will be included in the study population.

Study population:

Within the seven sub-counties, there are 22 lower-level government run health facilities, including 17 level II health centers (HC), and 5 level III HCs; 20 will be included in the randomization scheme.

Randomization:

The lower-level government-run health facilities in the study area will be the unit of randomization. Clusters will be defined as the catchment areas of the health centers, including households located within a 2km radius of the facilities. The clusters will be defined prior to randomization using the full census survey database. Households will be excluded from our sampling frame if they are > 2km from any health facility. The randomization will be conducted by an investigator who is not directly involved in the project. Health facilities will be stratified by level (HC IIs and HC IIIs). Because of the uneven numbers of HC IIs and IIIs, one of the HC IIIs without a laboratory will be 'demoted' and paired with a HC II to ensure even numbers. Restricted randomization will be employed to ensure balance on geographical location. Specifically, restrictions will be applied that exclude the allocation of all clusters originating from a single sub-county, or that are otherwise in close geographical proximity from being allocated to the same arm of the trial.

The Health Facility Intervention:

The intervention is designed to address barriers to delivering quality care at health centers and will focus on three components: (1) training in-charges in health center management, (2) providing training to health workers in fever case management and patient-centered services, and (3) ensuring adequate supplies of artemether-lumefantrine and RDTs.

  1. Training in-charges:

    All in-charges of health centers randomized to the HFI will be trained in health center management. The purpose of this training is to equip in-charges with the skills and tools required to effectively and efficiently manage their health center. The training will include three components: (1) financial management, (2) supply management, and (3) information management.

  2. Health worker training:

    A)Training in fever case management and use of RDTs All clinical staff will receive training in fever case management. Training will be based on the Integrated Malaria Management training package developed by the Joint Uganda Malaria Training Program (JUMP) team, and the RDT training guidelines which have been adopted and implemented by Uganda's MoH 'User's manual: Use of Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) for malaria in fever case management in Uganda'. The training program will be conducted by the JUMP training team over two weeks; the first two days will focus on theory, and will be followed by support supervision at the health facilities the next week. The training will be conducted in Tororo at a local health facility, and health workers will be trained in two small groups to ensure that work at the health facilities continues alongside the training. The impact of training on knowledge will be assessed using a pre-and post-training evaluation administered by the JUMP team. Additional support supervision will be conducted at 6 weeks and 6 months after the initial training and refresher training will be provided as needed.

    B)Training in patient-centered services The purpose of the Patient-Centered Services (PCS) training module is to identify and improve interpersonal interactions between health workers and patients. The module builds on the results of our formative research which identified several barriers to proving good quality health care at health facilities, including poor interpersonal interactions between health workers and community members resulting from poor communication skills, discriminatory behaviors of health workers, poor health worker motivation, and lack of patient-centered thinking. Through the PCS module, health workers will learn to recognize these challenges and develop skills for communicating and interacting with patients. The PCS module training will be implemented in a tiered approach to (1) all clinical staff, and (2) all health center support staff. All clinical staff, including in-charges, will receive the full PCS training package which includes self-observation tasks and specific emphasis on clinical and patient interaction challenges. Support staff including volunteers will receive a scaled-down PCS training package with specific emphasis on welcoming and guiding patients at the health facility. All training activities and workshops will be led by study personnel and trainers with experience in adult learning methodology.

  3. Supply of AL and RDTs for malaria If the amount of AL provided to the intervention health centers by NMS is not adequate to meet demand, or if the procurement of AL fails, the project will supply supplemental AL. In addition, we will ensure adequate supplies of RDTs at all intervention health centers.

Evaluation procedures:

Outcomes will be measured in three distinct populations: (1) cross-sectional surveys of children under 15 years randomly selected from households within the clusters; (2) a cohort of children under five randomly selected from households within the clusters and followed for 2 years; and (3) patients attending all government-run health facilities, including children under five and their caregivers participating in exit interviews on selected days every six months.

  1. Cross-sectional surveys will be conducted in randomly selected children under-five, and those between the ages of 5-15 years of age. The number of children sampled will be weighted according to the total population of each cluster to achieve a harmonic mean of 200 for each age category. A total of 8766 children will be sampled in each survey. Surveys will be conducted at baseline and then annually for each year; new populations of children will be selected for each survey. The survey will include a structured questionnaire administered to the primary caregiver, and a clinical and laboratory assessment of each child.
  2. A Cohort of children under five will be enrolled from 25 households randomly selected from each cluster, for a total of 500 households. The cohort will be dynamic, in that all children within a household, who are under the age of five and who meet selection criteria, will be included. A household survey will be conducted at the start of the study. Children will undergo clinical and laboratory assessments at baseline and then every six months. Primary caregivers will be asked to prospectively collect information on the clinical symptoms of participating children and expenditures for health care using pictorial diaries. Study personnel will visit the households monthly to collect the diaries and administer a monthly questionnaire. Participants will be followed for approximately 18 months in total, the equivalent of approximately 12 months following roll-out of the intervention.
  3. Patient Exit Interviews will be conducted with children under five and their caregivers at all health facilities. The purpose of the interviews is to evaluate for rational prescribing of ACTs, and to determine the level of satisfaction with the health facility visit. Three rounds of surveys are planned. In the first two surveys, 10 patients will be selected by convenience sampling from each facility to participate in the interviews (200 total per survey). In the final survey, 50 patients will be recruited to participate (1000 total in survey). In total, 1400 patients will participate in the interviews.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25000

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

FOR THE COHORT STUDY

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age < 5 years
  2. agreement of parents or guardians to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

1) intention to move during the follow-up period

FOR THE CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY:

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age < 15 years
  2. agreement of parents or guardians to provide informed consent
  3. agreement of a child aged 8 years or older to provide assent.

Exclusion Criterion:

1) inability to locate the child.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Facility intervention
In the clusters randomized to enhanced health facility-based care, the intervention is designed to address these barriers and will focus on three components: (1) training in-charges in health center management, (2) providing training to health workers in fever case management and patient-centered services, and (3) ensuring adequate supplies of artemether-lumefantrine and RDTs.
The intervention is designed to address barriers to delivering quality care at health centers and will focus on three components: (1) training in-charges in health center management, (2) providing training to health workers in fever case management and patient-centered services, and (3) ensuring adequate supplies of artemether-lumefantrine and RDTs.
Other Names:
  • HFI
Other: Standard of care
In the clusters randomized to standard care, standard care will include services typically provided by government-run facilities; we will not provide any additional support to these facilities. Health care will be provided to patients attending these facilities according to the usual standards; in-charges will continue to manage the facilities using their standard approach, no additional training will be provided to the health workers stationed at these facilities; and no support for staffing or supplies will be provided beyond what is supplied by the district and MoH.
In the clusters randomized to standard care, standard care will include services typically provided by government-run facilities; we will not provide any additional support to these facilities. Health care will be provided to patients attending these facilities according to the usual standards; in-charges will continue to manage the facilities using their standard approach, no additional training will be provided to the health workers stationed at these facilities; and no support for staffing or supplies will be provided beyond what is supplied by the district and MoH.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of anemia in children under five in the cross-sectional surveys
Time Frame: annually
Proportion of hemoglobin measurements < 11.0 g/dL as measured in cross sectional surveys. Anemia will be classified according to severity: mild (Hb 8.0 - 10.9), moderate (Hb 5.0 - 7.9), severe (Hb < 5.0).
annually

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of parasitemia in children under five in the cross-sectional surveys
Time Frame: annually
Proportion of thick blood smears that are positive for asexual parasites
annually
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Annually
Probability of dying between birth and five years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births
Annually
Incidence of hospitalizations in children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: two years
Overnight admission to a hospital or clinic
two years
Incidence of illness episodes in children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: Two years
Episode of illness as reported by primary caregiver
Two years
Incidence of febrile episodes in children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: Two years
Episode of illness associated with fever as reported by primary caregiver
Two years
Prompt effective treatment of fever in children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: Two years
Proportion of children with fever treated within 24 hours of onset of symptoms with an ACT
Two years
Incidence of serious adverse events in children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: Two years
Any experience that results in death, life-threatening experience, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or specific medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other serious outcomes
Two years
Prompt effective treatment of malaria in children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: Two years
Proportion of children with malaria (confirmed by a parasitological test) treated within 24 hours of onset of symptoms with an ACT
Two years
Appropriate treatment of malaria in children under five in the Patient Exit Interviews
Time Frame: Every six months
Proportion of children under five with suspected malaria and a positive RDT result who are appropriately given an ACT + Proportion of children under five with suspected malaria and a negative RDT result who are not prescribed an ACT
Every six months
Inappropriate treatment of malaria in children under five in the Patient Exit Interviews
Time Frame: Every six months
Proportion of children under five with suspected malaria and a positive RDT result who are inappropriately given a non-ACT regimen
Every six months
Patient satisfaction with health care in caregivers of children under five in the Patient Exit Interviews
Time Frame: Every six months
Proportion of patients indicating they were satisfied with care provided at the health center in exit interviews
Every six months
Patient attendance in the Health facility surveillance
Time Frame: Every two months
Total number of patients attending health facilities and their characteristics, including age, sex,village of residence, and diagnosis
Every two months
Stock-outs of ACTs in the Health facility surveillance
Time Frame: Every two months
Days per month that AL supplied by NMS via the district is not available
Every two months
Knowledge questionnaire scores for Health workers
Time Frame: Annually
Proportion of questions answered correctly by clinicians following training in fever case management
Annually
Prevalence of anemia in children aged 5-15years in the cross-sectional surveys
Time Frame: annually
Proportion of hemoglobin measurements < 11.0 g/dL as measured in cross sectional surveys. Anemia will be classified according to severity: mild (Hb 8.0 - 10.9), moderate (Hb 5.0 - 7.9), severe (Hb < 5.0).
annually

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antimalarial treatment incidence density for children under five in the cohort study
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of antimalarial treatments given for treatment of fever/malaria over the period of follow-up
2 years
Inappropriate treatment of malaria in children under five in the Patient Exit Interviews
Time Frame: Every six months
Proportion of children under five with suspected malaria and a negative RDT result who are inappropriately given an ACT + Proportion of children under five with suspected malaria and a positive RDT result who are not prescribed an ACT.
Every six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah G Staedke, MD, PhD, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2013

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on Enhanced health facility-based care

3
Subscribe