A Study Comparing the Clinical Equivalence of Two Mometasone Nasal Sprays in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

January 14, 2021 updated by: Sandoz

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Clinical Equivalence of Mometasone Nasal Spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) With NASONEX® Nasal Spray (Schering Corporation) in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

This study compared the efficacy and safety of a generic mometasone nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-site to compare the clinical equivalence of the test formulation of mometasone furoate monohydrate, 50 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d.) with the reference formulation Nasonex® nasal spray (Schering) in the relief of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria entered a 7-day placebo lead-in period. Following this placebo lead-in period, on Day 1 participants who continued to meet eligibility criteria were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups (Test Product:Reference Product:Placebo) for 14 days of treatment. In all treatment groups, participants were instructed to administer the study drug once daily at approximately the same time each day. A single dose of 200 mcg was 4 actuations, each containing 50 mcg per actuation. Patients were instructed to administer the 4 actuations alternating between right and left nostril, such that 2 actuations were not administered back to back to the same nostril.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

795

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
      • Kerrville, Texas, United States, 78028
      • Live Oak, Texas, United States, 78233
      • New Braunfels, Texas, United States, 78310
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Sylvana Research
      • Waco, Texas, United States, 76708

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female 12 years of age or older with a minimum of 2 years of previous history of seasonal allergic rhinitis to the pollen/allergen in season at the time the study is being conducted.
  • Signed informed consent form. For patients under the age of majority the parent or legal guardian should sign the consent form and the child will be required to sign a patient "assent" form.
  • Documented positive allergic skin test to local pollen, performed within the past 12 months.
  • A score of at least 6 on the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) with a minimum score of at least 2 for "nasal congestion" and a minimum score of at least 2 for one of the remaining 3 symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females who are pregnant, lactating or likely to become pregnant during the study.
  • History of asthma over the previous two years that required chronic therapy (with the exception of occasional acute or mild exercise induced asthma).
  • Patients with some nasal conditions, or with clinically significant nasal deformity or any recent nasal surgery or trauma that has not completely healed.
  • Upper respiratory tract infection or any untreated infections within the previous 30 days.
  • Patient has started immunotherapy/changed the dose within 30 days of starting the study or has desensitization therapy to the seasonal allergen that is causing the allergic rhinitis within the previous 6 months.
  • Patients with a history of tuberculosis, or with the presence of glaucoma, cataracts, ocular herpes simplex, conjunctivitis or other eye infection not related to the diagnosis of seasonal allergic rhinitis within 14 days of enrollment.
  • The patient has had recent exposure (30 days) or was at risk of being exposed to chicken pox or measles.
  • Any known hypersensitivity to mometasone, other steroids or any of the components of the study nasal spray.
  • Planned travel outside of the local area for more than 2 consecutive days or 3 days in total.
  • The patient has a history of alcohol or drug abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test
Mometasone furoate 50 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals) administered once daily at a dose of 200 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Mometasone nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 200 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Active Comparator: Reference
Mometasone furoate (Nasonex®) 50 mcg/actuation nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 200 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Mometasone nasal spray administered once daily at a dose of 200 mcg (4 actuations) for 14 days.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo nasal spray administered once daily for 14 days.
Placebo nasal spray administered once daily (4 actuations) for 14 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days

Patients were required to record a 12 hour "reflective" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to "look back" or "reflect" on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.

Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.

Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline rTNSS" - "mean post-randomization rTNSS". A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Baseline, 14 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days

Patients were required to record a 12 hour "reflective" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the rTNSS patients were asked to "look back" or "reflect" on their severity of nasal symptoms over the previous 12 hours. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean rTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.

Mean baseline rTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.

Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline rTNSS" - "mean post-randomization rTNSS". A positive change from baseline in rTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Baseline, 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Equivalence: Per-Protocol Population)
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days

Patients were required to record an "instantaneous" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS patients were asked to evaluate "how I feel now" regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.

Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.

Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline iTNSS" - "mean post-randomization iTNSS". A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Baseline, 14 days
Mean Change From Baseline in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) (Superiority: Intent-to-Treat Population)
Time Frame: Baseline, 14 days

Patients were required to record an "instantaneous" score twice a day approximately 12 hours apart. For the iTNSS patients were asked to evaluate "how I feel now" regarding their severity of nasal symptoms. The first rating on each day was taken prior to dosing. Patients were asked to score 4 nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing and itchy nose) on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptom). The means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the randomized treatment period were summed to give the mean iTNSS, which ranged from 0 to 12 with a lower score indicating less severe symptoms.

Mean baseline iTNSS was calculated by summing the means of the 4 individual symptom scores obtained over the 72 hours before the randomized treatment period.

Mean change from baseline was calculated as "mean baseline iTNSS" - "mean post-randomization iTNSS". A positive change from baseline in iTNSS is considered a favorable outcome.

Baseline, 14 days
Clinical Global Improvement Based on the Investigator's Assessment
Time Frame: Day 15
A global evaluation of efficacy relative to baseline was assessed separately by the investigator and the patient on Day 15. Both the investigator and the patient were asked to rate clinical improvement since baseline on a 5-category scale ranging from "No Relief" to "Complete Relief" of signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. This record shows the clinical global improvement based on the investigator's assessment.
Day 15
Clinical Global Improvement Based on the Patient's Assessment
Time Frame: Day 15
A global evaluation of efficacy relative to baseline was assessed separately by the investigator and the patient on Day 15. Both the investigator and the patient were asked to rate clinical improvement since baseline on a 5-category scale ranging from "No Relief" to "Complete Relief" of signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. This record shows the clinical global improvement based on the patient's assessment.
Day 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 24, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

Clinical Trials on Mometasone furoate 50 mcg/actuation nasal spray (Lek Pharmaceuticals)

3
Subscribe