Comparison of Tacrolimus and Myfortic Versus Tacrolimus and Sirolimus

Head to Head Comparison of Tacrolimus and Myfortic vs Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Used in Combination in Non-HLA Identical Living Donor Kidney Transplants

The investigators center has also analyzed data over the last 7 years from deceased donor (DD) and living donor (LD) kidney transplant recipients who were randomized into 3 immunosuppressive arms between 2000 and 2001. Thus the goal of the investigators study is to reduce the toxic effects of traditional immunosuppressive regimens involving high-dose calcineurin inhibitor agents by comparing low-dose TAC-MYF with low-dose TAC and de novo SRL regimens. In order to minimize exposure to TAC, the investigators center has previously shown favorable outcomes using combination Thymoglobulin and Zenapax (Daclizumab) for anti-lymphocyte induction in the investigator population of patients.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: Living Donor Kidney Transplants Patients
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Tacrolimus, Myfortic and Sirolimus

Detailed Description

A total of 150 randomized patients divided into 2 arms: 75 patients will be randomized to receive TAC-SRL, and 75 patients to receive TAC-MYF.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Non-HLA identical living donor kidney transplant patients

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient has previously received or is receiving an organ transplant other than a kidney.
• Patient is receiving an ABO incompatible donor kidney.
• Recipient or donor is known seropositive for human immunodeficiency (HIV) or Hepatitis C virus, or Hepatitis B virus antigenemia.
• Patient has a current malignancy or a history of malignancy (within the past 5 years), except non-metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated successfully, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix that has been treated successfully.
• Patients with significant liver disease, defined as having during the past 28 days continuously elevated AST (SGOT) and/or ALT (SGPT) levels greater than 3 times the upper value of the normal range at our center.
• Patient has uncontrolled concomitant infections and/or severe diarrhea, vomiting, active upper gastro-intestinal tract malabsorption or an active peptic ulcer or any other unstable medical condition that could interfere with study objectives.
• Patient is currently participating in another clinical trial of an investigational drug in the 30 days prior to transplant.
• Patient will be receiving any immunosuppressive agent other than those prescribed in the study.
• Patient is unable to take medications orally or via nasogastric tube by the morning of the second day following completion of the transplant procedure (i.e., skin closure).
• Patient is receiving or may require Warfarin, Fluvastatin, or herbal supplements during the study.
• Concurrent use of Astemizole, Pimozide, Cisapride, Terfenadine, or Ketoconazole.
• Patient has a known hypersensitivity to Tacrolimus, Thymoglobulin®, IL-2 receptor inhibitor monoclonal antibodies, Rapamune, Myfortic®, or corticosteroids.
• Patient is pregnant or lactating.
• Patients with a screening/baseline (or within 96 hours of transplant) total white blood cell count <4000/mm3; platelet count <100,000/mm3; fasting triglycerides >400 mg/dl (>4.6 mmol/L); fasting total cholesterol >300 mg/dl (>7.8 mmol/L); fasting HDL-cholesterol <30 mg/dl; fasting LDL-cholesterol >200 mg/dl.
• Patient is unlikely to comply with the visits scheduled in the protocol.
• Patient has any form of substance abuse, psychiatric disorder or a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may invalidate communication with the investigator.
• If Tacrolimus cannot be instituted for longer than 5 days postoperatively.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tacrolimus and Myfortic; Immunosuppressive	Drug: Tacrolimus, Myfortic and Sirolimus; Immunosuppressive drugs
Active Comparator: Tacrolimus and Sirolimus; Immunosuppressive	Drug: Tacrolimus, Myfortic and Sirolimus; Immunosuppressive drugs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
The primary endpoint is the time to initiation of the comparison study	3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Miami
• Collaborators: Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Linda Chen, M.D., University of Miami

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): January 1, 2013
• Study Completion (Anticipated): January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 23, 2009
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 23, 2009
• First Posted (Estimate): December 24, 2009

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): March 12, 2012
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 9, 2012
• Last Verified: December 1, 2009

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Physiological Effects of Drugs; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Anti-Infective Agents; Enzyme Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Immunosuppressive Agents; Immunologic Factors; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Antifungal Agents; Antitubercular Agents; Antibiotics, Antitubercular; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolic Acid; Sirolimus
• Other Study ID Numbers: 20090531