The iO-Flex® Study: Evaluation of the Baxano iO-Flex® System for Decompressive Lumbar Surgery

September 19, 2013 updated by: Baxano Surgical, Inc.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the iO-Flex® System in reducing pain and symptom severity in patients with one or two level lumbar spinal stenosis that requires surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Castro Valley, California, United States, 94546
        • Eden Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90036
        • Olympia Medical Center
      • Watsonville, California, United States, 95076
        • Watsonville Community Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Cumming, Georgia, United States, 30041
        • Resurgens Orthopaedics
    • Illinois
      • Bartlett, Illinois, United States, 60103
        • Suburban Orthopedics
    • Missouri
      • Jefferson City, Missouri, United States, 65101
        • Spine Midwest, Inc.
      • Joplin, Missouri, United States, 64804
        • McCune-Brooks Regional Hospital
    • New York
      • Lockport, New York, United States, 14094
        • Buffalo Spine Surgery
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • Triangle Orthopaedic Associates
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27401
        • Moses Cone Hospital
      • Lenoir, North Carolina, United States, 28645
        • Caldwell Memorial Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States, 19020
        • Rothman Institute
      • Easton, Pennsylvania, United States, 18017
        • Easton Hospital
    • South Carolina
      • Greenwood, South Carolina, United States, 29646
        • Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Center
    • Tennessee
      • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
        • Neurospine Solutions, PC
    • Texas
      • North Richland Hills, Texas, United States, 76182
        • Spine Works Institute
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23226
        • Tuckahoe Orthopaedic Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients at least 18 years of age presenting with failed conservative treatment for one or two level lumbar spinal stenosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria

Candidates for this study must meet ALL of the following criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years
  2. Leg/buttock pain with or without back pain
  3. Failed nonoperative medical management
  4. A minimum leg pain score of 4.0 cm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
  5. Clinical/radiographic diagnosis of LSS in the L2-L3 to L5-S1 region
  6. Able and willing to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical study

Exclusion Criteria

Candidates will be excluded from the evaluation if ANY of the following apply:

  1. Back pain only
  2. A diagnosis of central stenosis only
  3. More than two levels requiring decompression
  4. Fixed motor deficit
  5. Significant instability of the lumbar spine as defined by ≥ 4mm translation between standing flexion and extension lumbar spine plain film radiographs
  6. Sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebrae or multiple fractures of the vertebrae and/or hips
  7. Primary disc pathology and/or patients who will undergo a discectomy
  8. Prior surgery of the lumbar spine at the level(s) of planned treatment
  9. Spondylolisthesis or degenerative spondylolisthesis greater than Grade 1 (on a scale of 1 to 4)
  10. Spondylolysis (pars fracture) at any level in the lumbar spine
  11. Degenerative lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle greater than or equal to 25°
  12. Symptomatic vascular claudication in the lower extremities
  13. Cauda equina syndrome (neural compression causing neurogenic bowel or bladder dysfunction)
  14. Evidence of active (systemic or local) infection at time of surgery
  15. Paget's disease at involved segment or metastasis to the vertebra, osteomalacia, or other metabolic bone disease
  16. Tumor in the spine or a malignant tumor except for basal cell carcinoma
  17. Prisoner or transient
  18. Recent history of known narcotic abuse
  19. Any significant psychological disturbance past or present, psychotic or neurotic, that could impair the consent process or ability to complete subject self-report questionnaires
  20. Involved in pending litigation of the spine or worker's compensation related to the back
  21. Inability to communicate clearly in the English language
  22. Morbid obesity (BMI > 40)
  23. Plans to relocate within the next 2 years
  24. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
  25. Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder

    a. Subjects on Coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and reinitiation of anticoagulants.

  26. Subject unwilling to undergo blood transfusion, if necessary

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
iO-Flex
Decompressive lumbar surgery using Baxano iO-Flex® System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in the Symptom Severity domain of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) from baseline to 6 months post-procedure quantified as a percentage of subjects with an improvement of at least 0.5 points
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain related to lumbar spinal stenosis at the treatment level from baseline to 6 months post-procedure quantified as a percentage of subjects with an improvement of at least 30%
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Re-operation at the treatment level(s) at one year post-procedure
Time Frame: One year
One year
Acute safety outcomes will be determined by evaluating the type, frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events through discharge visits for all subjects
Time Frame: Hospital discharge
Hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in Visual Analog Scale scores compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Changes in Zurich Claudication Questionnaire scores compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Changes in Oswestry Disability Index scores compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Flexion/extension lumbar spine plain film radiographs will be collected and assessed for presence/absence of instability at baseline, 6-month, 12-month, and 24-months
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
6, 12, and 24 months
Long term safety outcomes that occur after discharge through 2 years post-procedure will be determined by evaluating adverse events involving the musculoskeletal or neurological systems
Time Frame: Through 2 years
Through 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 23, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Baxano iO-Flex® System

3
Subscribe