Colorectal Cancer Screening in Familiar-Risk Population: Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Versus Colonoscopy (COLONFAM)

January 7, 2014 updated by: Enrique Quintero

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Familiar-Risk Population: a Randomized Control Trial Comparing Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Versus Colonoscopy

This study is aimed: 1) to compare the accuracy of colonoscopy vs immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and colonoscopy when positive for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in familiar-risk population and; 2) to determine the complications associated with both strategies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an observational, controlled, randomized phase III study to evaluate the effectiveness of the iFOBT for detecting advanced neoplasia (polyps > 1cm in size, high grade dysplasia or with villous component, or CRC) in first degree relatives of patients with CRC.

Index cases will be interviewed to obtain the family tree and their first-degree relatives will be contacted to invite them to participate in the study. Index-cases, will be randomized into one of the following two groups in order that their relatives receive the same screening strategy: A) colonoscopy; or B) annual iFOBT test (OC-Sensor®, cut off ≥50 ng/ml) and colonoscopy if positive. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the iFOBT strategy, individuals randomized to group B will be invited to undergo a complete colonoscopy following two years follow-up. In addition, epidemiological data, personal history of disease, family history of neoplasm, characteristics of lesions at colonoscopy and histological diagnosis will be recorded.

To test the hypothesis of equivalence between the iFOBT test and colonoscopy for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasm, it was considered a probability of participation, detection capability and prevalence of advanced adenomas for iFOBT of 0.750, 0.565 and 0.077, respectively, being the product of them 0.033. In the case of colonoscopy, the likelihood of participation, detection capability and prevalence of advanced adenomas in this population at risk are 0,500, 0.965 and 0.077, respectively, and their product 0.037. Accordingly, for a Type I error (alpha) of 5%, a power of 80% and a maximum deviation between the probabilities of the two tests of 0.03 the number of subjects to be included per arm is 744

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1501

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tenerife, Spain, 38320
        • Hospital Universitario de Canarias

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 40-75 years, first degree relatives of patients with non-syndromic CRC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Personal history of CRC, colorectal adenoma, colorectal polyposis, or inflammatory bowel disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fecal occult blood testing
Immunochemical fecal occult blood test Annual (3 rounds), without diet restriction, 1 stool sample. Positive cut-off level: 50 ng/ml.
Annual (3 rounds), without diet restriction, 1 stool sample. Positive cut-off level: 50 ng/ml.
Active Comparator: Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy with sedation.
Colonoscopy with sedation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Advanced colorectal neoplasm detection rate [Time Frame: 2 years] [Designated as safety issue: No]
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complications rate
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Enrique Quintero, MD, Fundación Canaria para la Investigación Biomédica Rafael Clavijo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

February 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe