Adjustable Gastric Banding and Its Effects on Postprandial Glucose Metabolism Independent of Weight Loss

May 8, 2013 updated by: Adrian Vella, Mayo Clinic
The overall aim is to determine the mechanism(s) by which common bariatric surgical procedures alter carbohydrate metabolism. Understanding these mechanisms may ultimately lead to the development of novel interventions for the prevention and treatment of Type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overall aim of this application is to determine the mechanism(s) by which common bariatric surgical procedures alter carbohydrate metabolism. Very often, resolution of diabetes occurs in the early post-operative period prior to the development of significant weight loss. It has been suggested that bariatric surgery alters insulin action but few studies have examined insulin secretion or postprandial glucose fluxes in such patients. At the present time, little is known about how the various bariatric surgical procedures alter glucose homeostasis. It is essential that the effect of bariatric surgery and meal size on these parameters be understood and accurately measured. Enteroendocrine secretion is affected by the rate of intestinal delivery of calories and may also be modulated by the enteric nervous system and the rate of direct delivery of nutrients to enteroendocrine cells. Direct measurement of intestinal transit is also an important part of understanding how bariatric surgery alters intestinal secretion of hormones that may alter glucose metabolism. The Oral and C-peptide Minimal Models when applied to C-peptide, glucose and insulin concentrations after ingestion of a standard labeled mixed meal can accurately measure insulin secretion and action. Subsequently, the disposition index provides a measurement of the appropriateness of insulin secretion for the prevailing insulin action. When coupled with established triple-tracer methodology, a mixed meal can be used to measure fasting and postprandial glucose fluxes. The present experiments will determine the mechanism of glucose lowering after adjustable gastric banding (AGB). AGB seems to be superior to medical therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, bariatric surgery was not compared to intensive efforts at weight reduction which itself ameliorates diabetes and cardiovascular risk. It is therefore unknown if the beneficial effects of AGB on glucose metabolism are related to weight-loss per se rather than a direct effect of AGB.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • Individuals aged 30 - 65 years seen in the Nutrition Clinic at the Mayo Clinic, are potentially eligible prior to undergoing adjustable gastric banding (AGB).
  • We will recruit 20 subjects who have a fasting glucose concentration of 126 mg/dl on two or more occasions or who have a history of type 2 diabetes treated with one or two oral agents other than thiazolidinediones.
  • Potential participants will attend the Mayo Clinic Clinical Research Unit (CRU) for a screening visit.
  • In addition, the investigators will also recruit 20 subjects with type 2 diabetes, from the Nutrition Clinic who are not interested in pursuing surgical intervention.
  • The 2 groups will be matched for age, gender and BMI and duration and severity (HbA1c and no. of oral medications needed to achieve glycemic control) of diabetes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects less than 30 years of age or who are on insulin will not be studied to minimize the possibility of type 1 diabetes.
  • Subjects older than 65 years of age will not be studied to minimize the potential confounding effects of age on glucose tolerance.
  • Healthy status will indicate that the participant has no known active systemic illness and no history of microvascular or macrovascular complications of their diabetes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dietary and lifestyle modification
Patients in this arm will eat meals that are identical in size and caloric composition to those consumed by participants in the other arm who undergo adjustable gastric banding

Dietary and lifestyle modification

Subjects will meet with a dietitian and a psychologist on a weekly basis and consume a diet matched to that of the banding arm

Experimental: Adjustable gastric banding
Subjects will undergo gastric banding as per clinical practice
Placement of adjustable gastric band - laparoscopically

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disposition Index
Time Frame: Change compared to baseline 12 weeks after intervention
Insulin sensitivity which measures the overall ability of insulin to stimulate glucose disposal and inhibit glucose production will be calculated from plasma glucose and insulin concentrations using the "oral" glucose minimal model. Beta-cell responsivity indices will be calculated using plasma glucose and C-peptide concentrations using the oral C-peptide minimal model. The appropriateness of insulin secretion for the prevailing degree of insulin action is assessed by calculating the total disposition index (DItotal), which equals the product of insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity.
Change compared to baseline 12 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Gastric emptying and intestinal transit
Time Frame: change compared to baseline 12 weeks after intervention
change compared to baseline 12 weeks after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 10, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 09-008460

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Dietary and lifestyle modification

3
Subscribe