A Study Comparing Shunt Placement Versus Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in the Treatment of Hydrocephalus

May 6, 2016 updated by: Marvin Bergsneider, University of California, Los Angeles
The main purpose of this study is to compare two types of treatment of hydrocephalus: placement of a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt versus an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). A second goal of this study will be to understand how the two different types of procedures, VP shunt versus ETV, affect brain blood flow and pressures. Understanding these changes is important because the investigators hope is to someday be able to predict who will better respond to one procedure or another.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The management of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is challenging due to diagnostic uncertainties and high treatment risks. To date, there are no evidence-based treatment standards for this disorder. Our long-term goal is to improve the outcome of NPH improving our understanding of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hydrodynamics. The Specific Aims are to 1) determine the value of a high volume tap test, and 2) determine whether intracranial hemo/hydrodynamic variables, measured before a shunt operation, support the tuned-dynamic absorber model of intracranial pressure dynamics.

The study's Aim relates to modeling the complex hydro- and hemodynamics of intracranial physiology-pathology. We hypothesize that current hydrocephalus models are over-simplistic and that shunt-induced hydrodynamics are better modeled based on ICP waveform characteristics and the application of novel dynamic models. Much of the data for this Aim will be passively recorded during the routine care of the patient. In essence, we are only adding noninvasive MRI studies and TCD (transcranial Doppler) studies.

The experimental methodology is aimed at altering the intracranial compartment compliance by placing the patient in various positions so that these phase differences can be detected. The simplest way to alter intracranial compliance is to make postural changes. When a patient is in the Trendelenburg position, venous outflow out of the brain is hindered resulting in an increase in ICP and presumably a reduction in compliance. Conversely, raising the head of bed to 60 degrees will result in the opposite effect. The second mechanism of altering compliance (and ICP) will occur as a result of treating the hydrocephalus with a CSF shunt. Because we are able to study hydrocephalus patients prior to shunting as part of their diagnostic workup, we create a new state with the shunt that will allow us to further characterize the intracranial system.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Neurosurgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Hospitalized NPH and non-NPH patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Findings of gait/balance disturbance must be present, plus at least one other area of impairment in cognition, urinary symptoms or both
  • Minimum duration of symptoms of at least three months, progression over time, and no other neurological, psychiatric or general medical conditions that are sufficient to explain the presenting symptoms
  • MRI or CT performed after onset of symptoms must show evidence of ventricular enlargement (Evan's index > 0.3) not entirely attributable to cerebral atrophy or congenital enlargement
  • Criteria for shunt placement: we place greatest emphasis on the results of the temporary CSF drainage trial. Patients who experience a temporary improvement in neurological function (gait, bladder control, and/or cognition) are offered a shunt operation. For patients in whom the CSF drainage results were equivocal, then other factors such as elevated baseline ICP and/or high Rout will also be considered for a shunt under these circumstances

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 40
  • Fixed musculoskeletal deformities that will exclude gait improvement
  • Advanced dementia
  • Inability to obtain an MRI study
  • General medical conditions in which operative risks are excessive
  • Patients taking Warfarin (Coumadin) will be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hydrocephalus Patients
Those patients diagnosed with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
assessment of cerebrovascular fluid movement
Normal Participants
Individuals who are not diagnosed with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
assessment of cerebrovascular fluid movement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intracranial compliance
Time Frame: 72 hours
assessment of pulsatile cerbrovascular fluid movement
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cerebrovascular change
Time Frame: 72 hours
neuroimaging
72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marvin Bergsneider, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 9, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5R01NS054881-04 (NIH)
  • 07-08-038-03 (OTHER_GRANT: IRB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure

Clinical Trials on Non-invasive measures

3
Subscribe