A Cooperative Clinical Study of Abatacept in Multiple Sclerosis (ACCLAIM)

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Abatacept in Adults With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis

The ACCLAIM study is testing whether the medication "abatacept" can be of benefit to patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Although abatacept is an investigational medication for MS, it is not a new drug. Abatacept has been approved by the FDA to treat rheumatoid arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

MS is a chronic autoimmune disease in which blood cells that are supposed to protect the body from infection mistakenly attack the body's own tissue. In MS, the target of this attack is a protein called myelin that coats nerves throughout the body. Damage to this protective layer can lead to loss of neurologic function.

There are a number of treatments available to MS patients. Interferon beta, Copaxone, and other drugs can delay the worsening of the disease in some patients. For other patients, more aggressive treatment with chemotherapy drugs such as cyclophosphamide or azathioprine are needed. These drugs attempt to slow the disease by limiting the activity of the entire immune system. Because of this, they can often have serious side effects.

This study evaluates the efficacy of abatacept in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. In the first phase of the study, all participants will receive 8 intravenous treatments over a period of 24 weeks. Then, if a participant remains eligible, they will enter the second phase of the study and will receive another 8 treatments over the following 24 weeks. Two-thirds (2 out of 3) of participants will receive the study drug abatacept in the first phase, and then an inactive form (placebo) of the drug in the second phase. The remaining one-third (1 in 3) will get the placebo first, then the study drug in the second phase if they remain eligible. Therefore, all participants in the ACCLAIM trial will have the opportunity to receive the study drug abatacept if they remain healthy during the study. Participants will be asked to return for a follow-up visit 12 weeks after all treatments have been completed.

Regular appointments scheduled during the trial will be used to monitor participants' health and progress in the study. These appointments will include: physical and neurological exams, blood tests and motor function assessments. A total of 11 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures are scheduled during the study. The study medication and procedures related to the study will be provided at no expense to the participant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
    • Arizona
      • Phonix, Arizona, United States, 85013
        • St. Josephs Hospital and Medical Center - Barrow Neurology
    • California
      • Berkeley, California, United States, 94705
        • Jordan Research and Education Institute (REDI): Alta Bates Summit Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California - Keck School of Medicine
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Newport Beach Clinical Research Associates, Inc.
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • University of California, Davis
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami
    • Illinois
      • Flossmoor, Illinois, United States, 60422
        • South Suburban Neurology
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40207
        • Norton Neuroscience Institute - Norton Neurology Services MS Center
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71130
        • Louisiana State University
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55414
        • University of Minnesota
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Judith Jaffe Multiple Sclerosis Center: Weill Cornell Medical College
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • University of North Carolina
    • Ohio
      • Dayton, Ohio, United States, 45417
        • Neurology Specialists, Inc.
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
        • Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
        • The Neurology Foundation, Inc.
    • Tennessee
      • Franklin, Tennessee, United States, 37064
        • Advanced Neurosciences Institute
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically definite Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) meeting McDonald's criteria
  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores between 0 and 5
  • Active disease as defined by at least one of the following criteria:

    1. One or more documented clinical exacerbations in the past year prior to visit -2
    2. One or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced MRI lesions in the past year
  • Willingness to forego available MS therapies
  • Ability and willingness to provide informed consent and comply with study requirements and procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Normal brain MRI at week -5 scan
  • Females who are pregnant, intending pregnancy, or lactating, and unwilling to undergo pregnancy testing
  • Females who are unwilling to use approved methods of contraception for the duration of the study
  • Any chronic medical disease, other than MS, that compromises organ function
  • Active infection
  • Diagnosis of secondary or primary progressive MS
  • Previous treatment with cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, cladribine, or rituximab at any time
  • Previous treatment with abatacept within the last 52 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Previous treatment with systemic steroids, interferon, Copaxone, mycophenolate, or other immunosuppressive medications within the last 4 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Previous treatment with Natalizumab within the last 26 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Previous vaccination with live vaccine, or previous treatment with fingolimod, within the last 8 weeks prior to visit-2
  • Diagnosis of malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ
  • Claustrophobia or other contraindications to Gd-enhanced MRI
  • Positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology
  • Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
  • Positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) serology
  • Purified protein derivative (PPD)-tuberculin skin test result greater than 5 mm induration
  • Hemoglobin less than 10.5 gm/dL
  • Platelets less than 100K/µL
  • Absolute lymphocyte count less than 700 cells/μL
  • Serum creatinine greater than 1.20 mg/dL
  • eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2
  • IgG anti-cardiolipin antibody greater than 15 GPL U/mL
  • Previous participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 4 weeks prior to visit -2
  • Allergy or sensitivity to any component of abatacept
  • The presence of any medical condition that the investigator deems incompatible with participation in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Abatacept
Receives abatacept during first course of treatment, switching to placebo during extension phase.
In core/extension phase: administered IV at weeks 0/28, 2/30, and 4/32, and then every 4 weeks until week 24/52; Dosing: less than 60 kg, 500 mg; 60-100 kg, 750 mg; or greater than 100 kg, 1 gram
Other Names:
  • Orencia®
  • CTLA4-Ig
In core/extension phase: administered IV at weeks 0/28, 2/30, and 4/32, and then every 4 weeks until week 24/52
Other Names:
  • placebo abatacept
Placebo Comparator: Placebo, followed by abatacept
Receives a placebo for first course of treatment, switching to abatacept in the extension phase.
In core/extension phase: administered IV at weeks 0/28, 2/30, and 4/32, and then every 4 weeks until week 24/52; Dosing: less than 60 kg, 500 mg; 60-100 kg, 750 mg; or greater than 100 kg, 1 gram
Other Names:
  • Orencia®
  • CTLA4-Ig
In core/extension phase: administered IV at weeks 0/28, 2/30, and 4/32, and then every 4 weeks until week 24/52
Other Names:
  • placebo abatacept

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions Per Monthly Scans
Time Frame: Weeks 8-24
The mean number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans every 4 weeks from Week 8 to Week 24, adjusted for differences between subjects before treatment by subtracting the number of new inflammatory lesions observed from the week -1 MRI scan . An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.
Weeks 8-24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions on Monthly Scans
Time Frame: Weeks 4-24
The absolute number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans every 4 weeks from Week 8 to Week 24. An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.
Weeks 4-24
Lesion Volume Accumulation on T2-weighted MRI Scans Over 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Week -1 to Week 24
Difference in total volume of all T2 lesions detected at Week 24 MRI scan compared to Week -1 MRI scan. A T2 lesion is defined as an abnormal, hyperintense white-matter area visible on T2 weighted images. A higher score indicates more severe multiple sclerosis.
Week -1 to Week 24
Percent Brain Volume Change
Time Frame: Week -1 to Week 24
Percent Brain Volume Change is a measure of brain atrophy. Brain volume was calculated from a MRI scan at Week -1 and a MRI scan at Week 24 then the percent change from Week -1 to Week 24 was calculated. A negative change score means volume decreased. A decrease in volume indicates progression of multiple sclerosis severity.
Week -1 to Week 24
Mean Number of New Inflammatory Lesions in 8-week Intervals
Time Frame: Week 8 to Week 24
The mean number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans every 8 weeks from Week 8 to Week 24. An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.
Week 8 to Week 24
Number of Participants Progressing on the EDSS Scale by at Least 1 Point
Time Frame: Week -1 to Week 24
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is an assessment for severity of multiple sclerosis. The EDSS an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis) in half-point increments. Baseline EDSS score was the lowest score observed at either visit -2 (Wk -5) or visit -1 (Wk -1). EDSS progression is defined as an increase of at least 1 point on the EDSS compared to baseline if the baseline was greater than 1.0, or 1.5 points on EDSS if baseline was less than or equal to 1.0, which persisted for a minimum of 12 weeks or was found on three consecutive EDSS assessments starting at Visit 3 (Wk 8).
Week -1 to Week 24
Annualized Relapse Rate
Time Frame: Week -1 to Week 24
The rate of multiple sclerosis relapse by year. Annualized relapse rate is calculated by dividing the total number of relapse events in the core phase in each treatment group by the total number of days participants participated in the study during the core phase. This number is then multiplied by 365.25 to get an annualized rate.
Week -1 to Week 24
Mean Change in the MSFC Over 24 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Week -1 to Week 24
The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a three-part, standardized, quantitative assessment instrument to measure severity of multiple sclerosis. The MSFC combines three component measures to create a composite measure. The three component measures of the MSFC include the 1) Time 25-foot Walk (a measure of lower extremity function), 2) 9-hole Peg Test (a measure of upper extremity function), and 3) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (a measure of cognitive function). Mean change in MSFC scores from baseline to Week 24 were assessed. Scores from all three components are combined then are converted into a Z-score for analyses, with a range from -1 to 1. A positive score indicates improvement in the severity of multiple sclerosis symptoms while negative scores indicate decline in multiple sclerosis symptoms.
Week -1 to Week 24
Mean Number of New Inflammatory MRI Lesions Per Scan During the Extension Phase
Time Frame: Weeks 36 and 52
The mean number of new inflammatory MRI lesions obtained on scans at Weeks 36 and 52, adjusted for differences between subjects before treatment by subtracting the number of new inflammatory lesions observed from the week 24 MRI scan. An inflammatory lesion is defined as a gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesion that shows hyperintensity on postcontrast but no hyperintensity on noncontrast T1 images. A new inflammatory lesion is one that was not present on the previously scheduled MRI scan. If the previously scheduled MRI scan was missing, the scan was compared to the last available MRI.
Weeks 36 and 52
Lesion Volume Accumulation on T2-Weighted MRI Scans Between 24 Weeks and 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 24 to Week 52
Difference in total volume of all T2 lesions detected at Week 52 MRI scan compared to Week 24 MRI scan. A T2 lesion is defined as an abnormal, hyperintense white-matter area visible on T2 weighted images. A higher score indicates more severe multiple sclerosis.
Week 24 to Week 52
Percent Brain Volume Change Between 24 Weeks and 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 24 to Week 52
Percent Brain Volume Change is a measure of brain atrophy. Brain volume was calculated from a MRI scan at Week 24 and a MRI scan at Week 25 then the percent change from Week 24 to Week 52 was calculated. A negative change score means volume decreased. A decrease in volume indicates progression of multiple sclerosis severity.
Week 24 to Week 52
Number of Participants Progressing on the EDSS Scale by at Least 1 Point
Time Frame: Week 24 to Week 64
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is an assessment for severity of multiple sclerosis. The EDSS an ordinal clinical rating scale ranging from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis) in half-point increments. Extension baseline EDSS score was the most recent non-missing value on or before Week 28. Only participants who scored between a 0 and a 5 at baseline were analyzed for this outcome measure. EDSS progression is defined as an increase of at least 1 point on the EDSS compared to baseline if the baseline was greater than 1.0, or 1.5 points on EDSS if baseline was less than or equal to 1.0, which persisted for a minimum of 12 weeks or was found on three consecutive EDSS assessments starting at Visit 3 (Wk 8).
Week 24 to Week 64
Annualized Relapse in Extension Phase
Time Frame: Week 24 to Week 64
The rate of multiple sclerosis relapse by year. Annualized relapse rate is calculated by dividing the total number of relapse events in the extension and follow-up phases in each treatment group by the total number of days participants participated in the study during the extension and follow-up phases. This number is then multiplied by 365.25 to get an annualized rate.
Week 24 to Week 64
Mean Change in the MSFC in Extension Phase
Time Frame: Week 24 to Week 52
The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is a three-part, standardized, quantitative assessment instrument to measure severity of multiple sclerosis. The MSFC combines three component measures to create a composite measure. The three component measures of the MSFC include the 1) Time 25-foot Walk (a measure of lower extremity function), 2) 9-hole Peg Test (a measure of upper extremity function), and 3) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (a measure of cognitive function). Mean change in MSFC scores from Week 24 to Week 52 were assessed. Scores from all three components are combined then are converted into a Z-score for analyses, with a range from -1 to 1. A positive score indicates improvement in the severity of multiple sclerosis symptoms while negative scores indicate decline in multiple sclerosis symptoms.
Week 24 to Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samia Khoury, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 15, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The plan is to share data in: 1.)ImmPort, a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts that also provides data analysis tools that are available to researchers who register online and subsequently receive DAIT approval; and 2.)TrialShare, a clinical trials research portal developed by the Immune Tolerance Network that makes data from the consortium's clinical trials publicly available without charge.

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study protocol synopsis, -navigator, -schedule of assessments, study schema, and manuscript(s) with overviews, data and reports, participant level data
    Information identifier: ACCLAIM ITN035AI
    Information comments: ACCLAIM ITN035AI is the Study Identifier in the Immune Tolerance Network (ITN) TrialShare Clinical Trials Research Portal

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting

Clinical Trials on abatacept

3
Subscribe