- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01164579
Effects of Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)- Assessed Joint Structure In Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
April 21, 2015 updated by: Pfizer
An Exploratory Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study To Assess The Effects Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) On Magnetic Resonance Imaging Endpoints, In Methotrexate Naive Subjects With Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis in adult patients with moderate to severe disease who are methotrexate naïve.
The efficacy will be evaluated by exploring the effects on joint structure assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, x-rays and by standard clinical assessment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
109
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1015ABO
- OMI - Organización Médica de Investigación
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1034ACO
- Saint Dennis Medical Group S.A.
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1428DZF
- Consultorios Reumatológicos Pampa
-
-
-
-
Region XIV
-
Valdivia, Region XIV, Chile, 5090145
- Hospital Base Valdivia
-
-
X Region
-
Osorno, X Region, Chile, 5311089
- Consulta Privada Dr. Juan Ignacio Vargas
-
-
-
-
-
Split, Croatia, 21000
- University Hospital Centre Split,Department for Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical Rheumatology
-
Zagreb, Croatia, 10000
- General Hospital Sveti Duh
-
-
-
-
-
Hostivice, Czech Republic, 253 01
- ARTMEDI UPD s r.o.
-
Praha 1, Czech Republic, 110 00
- Nemocnice Na Frantisku s poliklinikou
-
Praha 1, Czech Republic, 110 00
- Nemocnice Na Frantisku
-
Praha 11 - Chodov, Czech Republic, 148 00
- DC Mediscan
-
Praha 2, Czech Republic, 128 50
- Revmatologicky ustav
-
Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic, 686 68
- Uherskohradistska nemocnice, a.s.
-
Zlin, Czech Republic, 760 01
- Nemocnice Atlas, a.s.
-
Zlin, Czech Republic, 760 01
- PV-Medical s.r.o.
-
-
-
-
-
Balatonfured, Hungary, 8230
- Drug Research Center Kft.
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1023
- Orszagos Reumatologiai es Fizioterapias Intezet
-
Budapest, Hungary, 1036
- Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
-
Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
- Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum, Reumatologiai Tanszek
-
Gyor, Hungary, 9027
- Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz/Reumatologiai es Mozgasszervi Rehabilitacios Centrum
-
-
-
-
-
Chapultepec, Mexico, 11850
- Hospital Angeles Mocel
-
Chihuahua, Mexico, 31000
- Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua S.C
-
Mexico D.F., Mexico, 11850
- Hospital Angeles Mocel
-
San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 78200
- Centro de Alta Especialidad en Reumatología e Investigación del Potosí S.C.
-
-
D. F.
-
Mexico, D. F., Mexico, 11850
- Centro de Investigación y Tratamiento Reumatológico S.C.
-
-
D.f.
-
Mexico, D.f., Mexico, 11850
- Hospital Angeles Mocel
-
-
Distrito Federal
-
Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico, 11850
- Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico SC
-
-
-
-
-
Bialystok, Poland, 15-879
- Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Centrum Osteoporozy i Chorob Kostno-Stawowych J.
-
Poznan, Poland, 61-397
- Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab. med. Pawel Hrycaj
-
Torun, Poland, 87-100
- NZOZ "Nasz Lekarz"
-
-
-
-
-
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00918
- Mindful Medical Research
-
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00918
- San Juan Arthritis & Research Center
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Gilbert, Arizona, United States, 85234
- Arthrocare, Arthritis Care & Research, PC
-
-
California
-
Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92646
- Talbert Medical Group
-
Upland, California, United States, 91786
- Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
-
-
Florida
-
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States, 32174
- Millennium Research
-
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States, 33782
- DMI Research, Inc.
-
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33710
- St. Petersburg Arthritis Center
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104 5005
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
-
-
Texas
-
Allen, Texas, United States, 75013
- Office of John P. Lavery, MD, PA
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients with moderate to severe early rheumatoid arthritis (< 2 years) who are methotrexate and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug naive.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or lactating patients;
- Patients with renal or hepatic impairment or other severe or progressing disease;
- Patients with contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium contrast.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Tofacitinib (CP 690,550) 10 mg BID plus MTX
|
Tofacitinib (CP 690,550) 10 mg BID, tablets + methotrexate (MTX) 10 mg/wk to 20 mg/wk, titrated over 2 months
|
Experimental: Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) 10 mg BID, tablet plus placebo MTX
|
Tofacitinib (CP-90,550) 10 mg BID, tablets.
Placebo to match methotrexate (MTX) capsules titrated as in Treatment Arm 1.
|
Active Comparator: Placebo tofacitinib (CP-690,55) plus MTX 10 mg/wk to 20 mg/wk
|
Methotrexate (MTX) 10 mg/wk to 20 mg/wk, capsules, titrated over 2 months.
Placebo in tablets to match tofacitinib
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline to Month 3 in Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (RAMRIS) Wrist and Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) Synovitis
Time Frame: Month 3
|
Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium.
T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium.
Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis.
Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the first through fifth MCP joints.
A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment.
Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24.
A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
|
Month 3
|
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in OMERACT RAMRIS Wrist and MCP Bone Marrow Edema
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Bone edema was assessed at 25 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 10 in attached hand.
Bone edema was defined as a lesion within the trabecular bone, with ill-defined margins and signal characteristics consistent with increased water content.
Each bone was scored separately; the scale was 0-3 based on the proportion of bone with edema, as follows 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%.
OMERACT RAMRIS total bone edema score for hands/wrists was sum of the individual scores for each location.
Thus the maximum score per hand/wrist was 75 (range 0-75).
Increasing score=greater severity.
|
Month 6
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 6, and 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Wrist and MCP Synovitis
Time Frame: Months 1, 6, and 12
|
Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium.
T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium.
Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis.
Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the first through fifth MCP joints.
A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment.
Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24.
A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
|
Months 1, 6, and 12
|
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, and 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Marrow Edema in Wrist and MCP
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, and 12
|
Bone edema was assessed at 25 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 10 in attached hand.
Bone edema was defined as a lesion within the trabecular bone, with ill-defined margins and signal characteristics consistent with increased water content.
Each bone was scored separately; the scale was 0â€"3 based on the proportion of bone with edema, as follows 0: no edema; 1: 1â€"33% of bone edematous; 2: 34â€"66% of bone edematous; 3: 67â€"100%.
OMERACT RAMRIS total bone edema score for hands/wrists was sum of the individual scores for each location.
Thus the maximum score per hand/wrist was 75 (range 0-75).
Increasing score=greater severity.
|
Months 1, 3, and 12
|
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, and 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Wrist and MCP Erosions
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, and 12
|
Bone erosion assessed at 25 anatomic locations: 15 in 1 wrist and 10 in attached hand.
Each site was scored in 1.0 increments from 0 (no damage) to 10 (severe damage), indicating erosion (each unit=10% bone loss) of original articular bone.
OMERACT RAMRIS total erosion score for hands/wrists was sum of the individual scores for each location.
Thus the maximum score per hand/wrist is 250 (range 0-250).
Increasing score=greater severity.
|
Months 1, 3, 6, and 12
|
Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
Modified TSS is a measure of change in joint health.
TSS is defined as joint space narrowing score (range 0 [no narrowing] to 168 [high narrowing]) plus (+) erosion score (range is from 0 [no erosion] to 280 [high erosion]).
The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status).
Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in mTSS
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
Modified TSS is a measure of change in joint health.
TSS is defined as joint space narrowing score (range 0 [no narrowing] to 168 [high narrowing]) + erosion score (range is from 0 [no erosion] to 280 [high erosion]).
The modified TSS range is from 0 (no damage) to 448 (bad joint status).
Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Scores at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
JSN score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health.
JSN score range is 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (high narrowing).
Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in JSN Scores
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
JSN score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health.
JSN score range is 0 (no narrowing) to 168 (high narrowing).
Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Erosion Scores at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
Erosion score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health.
Erosion score range is from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (high erosion).
Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Change From Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in Erosion Score
Time Frame: Months 6 and 12
|
Erosion score (a component of the modified TSS) is a measure of change in joint health.
Erosion score range is from 0 (no erosion) to 280 (high erosion).
Increase from baseline represents disease progression and / or joint worsening; no change represents halting of disease progression; a decrease represents improvement.
|
Months 6 and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20) Response
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥)20% improvement in tender joint count; ≥20% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: Participant's Assessment of Pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50) Response
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
ACR50 response: ≥ 50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, 2) Participant's Assessment of disease activity, 3) Paricipant's Assessment of Pain, 4) Participant's assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) CRP at each visit.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity, 2) Participant's Assessment of Disease Activity, 3) Participant's Assessment of Pain, 4) Participant's Assessment of Functional Disability via a HAQ, and 5) CRP at each visit.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and CRP (DAS28-3 [CRP])
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
DAS28-3 (CRP) less than or equal to (≤)3.2
implied low disease activity and greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-3 (CRP) less than (<)2.6 = remission.
|
Baseline and Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-3 (CRP)
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-4 [ESR])
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Participant Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4; higher score=more disease activity.
DAS28-4 (ESR) ≤3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6 = remission.
|
Baseline and Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Change From Baseline in DAS28-4 (ESR)
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and Participant Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4; higher score=more disease activity.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-3 (CRP) Response (Good or Moderate Improvement)
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-3(CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28-joints count and CRP (mg/L).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
DAS28 categorical responses define a good (absolute: <3.2 or >1.2 improvement from baseline [BL]), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2
change from BL), or no response (absolute: >5.1 or <0.6 change from BL).
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-3 (CRP) Score ≤3.2
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-3(CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28-joints count and CRP (mg/L).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
DAS28-3(CRP) ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-3 (CRP) Score <2.6
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-3(CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28-joints count and CRP (mg/L).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity.
DAS28-3(CRP) <2.6 implied remission.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-4 (ESR) Response (Good or Moderate Improvement)
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-4(ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity.
DAS28 categorical responses define a good (absolute: <3.2 or >1.2 improvement from BL), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2
change from BL), or no response (absolute: >5.1 or <0.6 change from BL).
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-4 (ESR) ≤3.2
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-4(ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity.
DAS28-4(ESR) ≤3.2 implied low disease activity.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-4 (ESR) <2.6
Time Frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
DAS28-4(ESR) was calculated from swollen joint count and tender joint count using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment).
Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score=more disease activity.
DAS28-4(ESR) <2.6 implied remission.
|
Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Erratum In: Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Oct 10;:
- Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Yamaoka K, Lee EB, Hirose T, Rivas JL, Kwok K, Burmester GR. Clinical Management of Herpes Zoster in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib Treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Feb;9(1):243-263. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00390-0. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
- Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, Curtis JR, Lee EB, Nash P, Winthrop KL, Charles-Schoeman C, Wang L, Chen C, Kwok K, Biswas P, Shapiro A, Madsen A, Wollenhaupt J. Long-term safety of tofacitinib up to 9.5 years: a comprehensive integrated analysis of the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme. RMD Open. 2020 Oct;6(3). pii: e001395. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001395.
- van der Heijde D, Landewe RBM, Wollenhaupt J, Strengholt S, Terry K, Kwok K, Wang L, Cohen S. Assessment of radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib in long-term studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Apr 6;60(4):1708-1716. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa476.
- Conaghan PG, Ostergaard M, Troum O, Bowes MA, Guillard G, Wilkinson B, Xie Z, Andrews J, Stein A, Chapman D, Koenig A. Very early MRI responses to therapy as a predictor of later radiographic progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Oct 21;21(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2000-1.
- Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, Curtis JR, Lee EB, Nash P, Winthrop KL, Charles-Schoeman C, Thirunavukkarasu K, DeMasi R, Geier J, Kwok K, Wang L, Riese R, Wollenhaupt J. Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;76(7):1253-1262. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
- Conaghan PG, Ostergaard M, Bowes MA, Wu C, Fuerst T, van der Heijde D, Irazoque-Palazuelos F, Soto-Raices O, Hrycaj P, Xie Z, Zhang R, Wyman BT, Bradley JD, Soma K, Wilkinson B. Comparing the effects of tofacitinib, methotrexate and the combination, on bone marrow oedema, synovitis and bone erosion in methotrexate-naive, early active rheumatoid arthritis: results of an exploratory randomised MRI study incorporating semiquantitative and quantitative techniques. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jun;75(6):1024-33. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208267. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
- Cohen S, Radominski SC, Gomez-Reino JJ, Wang L, Krishnaswami S, Wood SP, Soma K, Nduaka CI, Kwok K, Valdez H, Benda B, Riese R. Analysis of infections and all-cause mortality in phase II, phase III, and long-term extension studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):2924-37. doi: 10.1002/art.38779.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 15, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
July 16, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 22, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2015
Last Verified
April 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Immune System Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Arthritis
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Dermatologic Agents
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Reproductive Control Agents
- Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal
- Abortifacient Agents
- Folic Acid Antagonists
- Methotrexate
- Tofacitinib
Other Study ID Numbers
- A3921068
- 2010-020890-18 (EudraCT Number)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal...Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiCompleted
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis | Juvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisMexico
-
Hamad Medical CorporationUnknownRHEUMATOID ARTHRITISQatar
Clinical Trials on Tasocitinib plus Methotrexate
-
PfizerCompletedRheumatoid ArthritisUnited States, Hungary
-
Tongji HospitalGeneplus-Beijing Co. Ltd.; Chinese Cooperative Group of Liver Cancer (CCGLC)RecruitingCholangiocarcinoma Non-resectableChina
-
Hunan Province Tumor HospitalRecruitingSmall Cell Lung CancerChina
-
RemeGen Co., Ltd.Terminated
-
RemeGen Co., Ltd.CompletedModerate and Severe RheumatoId ArthritisChina
-
PfizerCompleted
-
University of South CarolinaAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.CompletedBreast CancerUnited States
-
Qure Healthcare, LLCLineagenCompletedIntellectual Disability | Developmental DelayUnited States