Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain (Predictio) (Predictio)

April 5, 2016 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain

Drug therapy in patients with chronic low back pain is a major challenge for physicians. One of the problems is the lacking knowledge in prediction of drug efficacy in a chosen patient. Usually one of the classes of pain medication is given to patients with a similar clinical picture, although different pain mechanisms may be responsible for this clinical picture.

Another reason for variable drug efficacy are genetic polymorphisms, this may be the reason why an unique drug produces different responses (from a lacking analgesic effect up to excessive effect or side-effects.

Quantitative sensory testing is a method that documents alterations in the pain perception system. Linking genetic polymorphisms to quantitative sensory testing may give us a tool for anticipation of drug efficacy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background

Drug therapy is an essential part of pain treatment. However, only a minor part of pain patients benefits from the available treatments or is able to tolerate the drugs. One important limitation of drug therapy is lack of instruments to predict their effect. Indeed, in clinical practice "classes" of drugs (e.g. antidepressants) are given to "classes" of patients (e.g. neuropathic pain patients). However, within those classes of patients very different pain mechanisms are likely to underlie the pain condition in different patients. If drugs affect part of these mechanisms, they will not work in all patients. Another reason for variability in drug responses is genetic variation leading to a spectrum of different responses to analgesics, from lack of efficacy to exaggerated responses, up to intolerable adverse effects.

Quantitative sensory testing comprises methods that document alterations and reorganization of the nociceptive system. Measuring an abnormal result in a chronic pain patient may provide us with the information that the underlying pain pathways somehow must be altered. An essential question is whether this information can be linked to drug efficacy in a mechanism-based treatment approach. A further important question is whether assessing genetic polymorphisms can explain different drug effects and hence help selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for individual patients.

Objective

We will test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between disturbances in specific pain mechanisms as assessed by quantitative sensory tests and analgesic efficacy after single-dose drug administration in patients with chronic low back pain. Genetic factors affecting drug metabolism and pain sensitivity will be analyzed as additional explanatory variables for drug efficacy.

Methods

Quantitative sensory testing: Heat pain threshold and tolerance, Ice water testing with central modulation of nociceptive input (DNIC), electrical pain detection and temporal summation (skin probe), pressure algometry with pain detection and threshold Drugs investigated: Imipramine, Oxycodone, Clobazam Blood samples: pharmacogenetics: Cytochrome variants CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, COMT haplotypes, CGH-1 variants, A118G of mu opioid receptor gene variants pharmacokinetics: kinetics of imipramine and desipramine

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bern University Hospital
      • Dep. of Anesthesiolgy and Pain therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, 3010 Bern
        • Andreas Siegenthaler

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain with NRS>2
  • Chronic low back pain since more than 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • pregnancy
  • use of pain medication other than paracetamol and ibuprofen in the last 7 days
  • suspicion of radicular pain
  • suspicion of intervertebral disk herniation
  • foraminal intervertebral stenosis
  • suspicion of polyneuropathy
  • diabetes
  • parkinson disease
  • alzheimer disease
  • glaucoma
  • prostata hyperplasia or voiding problems
  • known heart rhythm problems
  • heart insufficiency NYHA 3-4
  • Systemic inflammatory disease
  • Ongoing oncologic disease
  • drug or alcohol abuse
  • Significant depressive disease (BDI-FS>9)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Oxycodone 15mg
15mg single administration p.o.
Active Comparator: 2
Clobazam 20mg
20mg single administration p.o.
Active Comparator: 3
Imipramine 75mg
75mg single administration p.o.
Placebo Comparator: 4
Tolterodine 1mg
1 mg single administration p.o.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Difference in NRS(pain scale) between measurement after and before drug administration
Time Frame: 07/2012
07/2012

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patients global impression of change scale after drug administration
Time Frame: 07/2012
07/2012
Pharmacogenetic variables(see before)
Time Frame: 07/2012
07/2012
Pharmacokinetics: measure of Imipramine and desipramine blood levels
Time Frame: 07/2012
07/2012
Reliability of repeated quantitative sensory testing in the same patient
Time Frame: 12/2010
12/2010

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Michele Curatolo, Prof, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
  • Study Director: Andreas Siegenthaler, Dr Med, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Pascal H Vuilleumier, Dr Med, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Oxycodone 15mg

3
Subscribe