Sitting Postural Control in Infants With Cerebral Palsy

Investigation of the Dynamics of Sitting Postural Control in Infants With Cerebral Palsy

The overall goal of this research is to understand the mechanisms underlying the development of postural control in sitting using new methodology, in order to provide a scientific basis for evaluation and treatment of posture and movement disorders in infants with cerebral palsy. The development of early posture control remains poorly understood despite considerable therapeutic effort. Infants with cerebral palsy show their first delays in the acquisition of sitting, with subsequent problems developing adequate posture and movement control. Identifying the delay, determining the nature of the problem, and evaluating the effectiveness of treatment quickly, are vital in the early part of an infant's life, since this is the time of greatest plasticity. Tools from nonlinear dynamics, which are increasingly being used to examine other biological rhythms, are used in this study to analyze postural sway from center of pressure data during the development of sitting postural control.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cerebral Palsy
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Physical therapy

Detailed Description

Background: The ability to sit independently is fundamental for function but delayed in infants with cerebral palsy (CP). Studies of intervention directed specifically toward sitting in infants with CP have not been reported. Objective: Our purpose was to compare two interventions for improving sitting postural control in infants with CP. Design: For this randomized longitudinal study, infants under 2 years old and at risk for CP were recruited for intervention directed toward sitting independence. Setting: The intervention was conducted at home or at an outpatient facility. Patients: Fifteen typically developing infants (5 months old, SD .5 months at entry) were followed longitudinally as a comparison for postural variables. Thirty-five infants with delays in achieving sitting were recruited. Infants with delays were randomly assigned to a home program (1x/week for 8 weeks; mean age=15.5 months, SD=7 months), or a perceptual-motor intervention (2x/week for 8 weeks; mean age=14.3 months, SD=3 months). Measurements: The primary outcome measure was Center of Pressure (COP) data, from which linear and nonlinear variables were extracted. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) sitting subsection was our clinical outcome measure. Results: There was a main effect of time in the GMFM sitting subscale and in two of the COP variables. Interaction of group by time factors indicated significant differences between intervention groups on two COP measures, in favor of the group with perceptual-motor intervention. Limitations: The small number of infants limits the ability to generalize the findings. Conclusions: Although both groups made progress in the GMFM, the COP measures indicated an advantage for the group with perceptual-motor intervention. The COP measures appear sensitive for assessment of infant posture control and quantifying intervention response.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 35
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Nebraska
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
      • University of Nebraska Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 5 months to 2 years (Child)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• able to prop sit for 10 seconds
• 1.5 SD below mean on Peabody motor assessment
• between 5 months and 24 months old
• diagnosis of CP or at risk for CP

Exclusion Criteria:

• blindness
• dislocated hip

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Typically Developing Infants; Typically developing infants (5 months old, SD .5 months at entry) were followed longitudinally as a comparison for postural variables. The primary outcome measure is Center of Pressure (COP) data, from which linear and nonlinear variables were extracted. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) sitting subsection was our clinical outcome measure.
Active Comparator: Home Program; Home program (1x/week for 8 weeks). The primary outcome measure is Center of Pressure (COP) data, from which linear and nonlinear variables were extracted. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) sitting subsection was our clinical outcome measure.	Other: Physical therapy; Perceptual motor therapy, comparing twice weekly to once weekly home program
Active Comparator: Perceptual-motor intervention; Perceptual-motor intervention (2x/week for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure is Center of Pressure (COP) data, from which linear and nonlinear variables were extracted. The Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) sitting subsection was our clinical outcome measure.	Other: Physical therapy; Perceptual motor therapy, comparing twice weekly to once weekly home program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Gross Motor Function Measure, Sitting Section	sitting skill assessment	2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Center of pressure measures	linear and nonlinear measures of center of pressure in sitting	2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Nebraska
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Nicholas Stergiou, PhD, University Of Nebraska

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Harbourne RT, Willett S, Kyvelidou A, Deffeyes J, Stergiou N. A comparison of interventions for children with cerebral palsy to improve sitting postural control: a clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2010 Dec;90(12):1881-98. doi: 10.2522/ptj.2010132. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 1, 2004
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 10, 2010
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 13, 2010
• First Posted (Estimated): September 14, 2010

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 1, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 29, 2023
• Last Verified: August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: infant; postural control; sitting
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Brain Damage, Chronic; Cerebral Palsy
• Other Study ID Numbers: 0183-02-FB; H133G040118 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Dept of Education, NIDRR)