Fractional Photothermolysis for Treating Melasma

November 22, 2010 updated by: Laserklinik Karlsruhe

A Multicenter Study of Fractional Photothermolysis in the Treatment of Melasma

In several observational studies, non-ablative fractional photothermolysis (FP) has been reported to bridge the gap between efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of melasma. While some beneficial effects have been attributed to non-ablative FP in treating melasma, methodological constraints (e.g., a limited number of patients; no control group assignment) impair efficacy assessment; currently published results neither allow researchers and clinicians to draw valid conclusions nor warrant recommendations for therapy. In particular, bias resulting from poorly designed trials may mislead clinicians into making a wrong decision and generate not only unnecessary treatment (i.e., costs), but also a risk of side effects for patients. Therefore, the purpose of this trial was to clarify the efficacy and safety of FP in the treatment of melasma as compared to the lone application of a sun-blocking lotion (SPF >50).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Karlsruhe, Germany, 76133
        • Laserklinik Karlsruhe

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (female/male) with clinical evidence of melasma;
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype I-III;
  • Ability and willingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or nursing;
  • Inability to avoid sun exposure for occupational reasons (e.g., gardeners);
  • Known history or clinically relevant allergy to components of the sunscreen or topical anaesthetic;
  • Use of topical retinoids within 3 months prior to study enrolment;
  • Use of topical hydroquinone within 6 months prior to study enrolment;
  • Use of topical corticosteroids within 1 month prior to study enrolment;
  • Use of topical cosmetic depigmenting agents within 2 weeks prior to study enrolment;
  • Laser surgery procedures within the treatment region during the last 12 weeks prior to enrolment;
  • Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant treatment;
  • Photo-sensitizing medication (e.g., tetracyclines, gold).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Experimental: Treatment group
Broad-spectrum UV block plus non-ablative 1,550-nm fractional treatment
  • Wavelength: 1,550 nm;
  • Energy: 15 mJ/MTZ;
  • Total coverage: 20%;
  • Total density: 1,048 MTZs/cm2;
  • Density per pass: 131 MTZ/cm2;
  • Number of passes: 8.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) at 12 weeks after final treatment
Time Frame: Pre-treatment and at final follow-up (12 weeks after last treatment session)
Pre-treatment and at final follow-up (12 weeks after last treatment session)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Subjective assessment of treatment outcome (by patients)
Time Frame: Pre-treatment and at final follow-up
Pre-treatment and at final follow-up
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Pre-treatment and at final follow-up
Pre-treatment and at final follow-up
Side effects
Time Frame: At each follow-up visit (week 3, 6, 9, 12)
At each follow-up visit (week 3, 6, 9, 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2010

Last Verified

November 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melasma

Clinical Trials on Non-ablative fractional photothermolysis laser

3
Subscribe