The Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) Ligand Obeticholic Acid in NASH Treatment Trial(FLINT) (FLINT)

The Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) Ligand Obeticholic Acid in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Treatment (FLINT) Trial

Administration of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) ligand obeticholic acid (OCA) for 72 weeks to subjects with biopsy evidence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) will result in improvement in their liver disease as measured by changes in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate whether treatment with obeticholic acid, 25 mg daily for 72 weeks compared to treatment with placebo, improves the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as determined from hepatic histology.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

283

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California, San Diego
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104
        • St. Louis University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • Case Western Reserve University
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older as of the initial screening interview and provision of consent
  • Histologic evidence of definite or probable nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) based upon a liver biopsy obtained no more than 90 days prior to randomization and a nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) of 4 or greater with at least 1 in each component of the NAS score (steatosis scored 0-3, ballooning degeneration scored 0-2, and lobular inflammation scored 0-3).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or history of significant alcohol consumption for a period of more than 3 consecutive months within 1 year prior to screening (significant alcohol consumption is defined as more than 20 grams per day in females and more than 30 grams per day in males, on average)
  • Inability to reliably quantify alcohol consumption based upon local study physician judgment
  • Use of drugs historically associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (amiodarone, methotrexate, systemic glucocorticoids, tetracyclines, tamoxifen, estrogens at doses greater than those used for hormone replacement, anabolic steroids, valproic acid, and other known hepatotoxins) for more than 2 weeks in the year prior to randomization
  • Prior or planned (during the study period) bariatric surgery (eg, gastroplasty, roux-en-Y gastric bypass)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes defined as Hemoglobin A1c 9.5% or higher within 60 days prior to enrollment
  • Presence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy
  • A platelet count below 100,000/mm3
  • Clinical evidence of hepatic decompensation as defined by the presence of any of the following abnormalities:

    • Serum albumin less than 3.2 grams/deciliter (g/dL)
    • International Normalized Ratio(INR)greater than 1.3
    • Direct bilirubin greater than 1.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
    • History of esophageal varices, ascites or hepatic encephalopathy
  • Evidence of other forms of chronic liver disease:

    • Hepatitis B as defined by presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)
    • Hepatitis C as defined by presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) or positive hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV)
    • Evidence of ongoing autoimmune liver disease as defined by compatible liver histology
    • Primary biliary cirrhosis as defined by the presence of at least 2 of these criteria (i) Biochemical evidence of cholestasis based mainly on alkaline phosphatase elevation (ii)Presence of anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) (iii)Histologic evidence of nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis and destruction of interlobular bile ducts
    • Primary sclerosing cholangitis
    • Wilson's disease as defined by ceruloplasmin below the limits of normal and compatible liver histology
    • Alpha-1-antitrypsin(A1AT) deficiency as defined by diagnostic features in liver histology (confirmed by alpha-1 antitrypsin level less than normal; exclusion at the discretion of the study physician)
    • History of hemochromatosis or iron overload as defined by presence of 3+ or 4+ stainable iron on liver biopsy
    • Drug-induced liver disease as defined on the basis of typical exposure and history
    • Known bile duct obstruction
    • Suspected or proven liver cancer
    • Any other type of liver disease other than nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 300 units per liter (U/L)
  • Serum creatinine of 2.0 mg/dL or greater
  • Use of ursodeoxycholic acid (Ursodiol, Urso) within 90 days prior to enrollment
  • Inability to safely obtain a liver biopsy
  • History of biliary diversion
  • Known positivity for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection
  • Active, serious medical disease with likely life expectancy less than 5 years
  • Active substance abuse including inhaled or injection drugs in the year prior to screening
  • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, potential for pregnancy and unwillingness to use effective birth control during the trial, breast feeding
  • Participation in an investigational new drug (IND) trial in the 30 days before randomization
  • Any other condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would impede compliance or hinder completion of the study
  • Failure to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
placebo capsule, 25 mg daily for 72 weeks
Other Names:
  • Placebo for obeticholic acid
Active Comparator: Obeticholic acid
obeticholic acid
25 mg daily for 72 weeks
Other Names:
  • farnesoid X receptor (FXR) ligand obeticholic acid (OCA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hepatic Histological Improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Activity Score (NAS)
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks

Centrally scored histological improvement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) from baseline to the end of 72 weeks of treatment, where improvement is defined as:

  1. No worsening in fibrosis; and
  2. A decrease in NAFLD Activity Score (NAS) of at least 2 points
baseline to 72 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Resolution of NASH Diagnosis
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Resolution of definite nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Resolution defined as either not NAFLD, or NAFLD but not non-alcoholic steatohepatitis on week 72 biopsy
baseline to 72 weeks
Fibrosis: Patient With Improvement
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Patients with improvement in fibrosis score. Fibrosis was assessed on a scale of 0-4, with higher scores showing more severe fibrosis.
baseline to 72 weeks
Fibrosis: Change in Score
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Change in fibrosis score. Fibrosis was assessed on a scale of 0-4, with higher scores showing more severe fibrosis.
baseline to 72 weeks
Total NAFLD Activity Score: Change in Score
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
NAFLD activity score was assessed on a scale of 0-8, with higher scores showing more severe disease (the components of this measure are steatosis [assessed on a scale of 0-3], lobular inflammation [assessed on a scale of 0-3], and hepatocellular ballooning [assessed on a scale of 0-2]).
baseline to 72 weeks
Hepatocellular Ballooning: Patients With Improvement
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Patients with improvement in hepatocellular ballooning score. Hepatocellular ballooning was assessed on a scale of 0-2, with higher scores showing more severe ballooning.
baseline to 72 weeks
Hepatocellular Ballooning: Change in Score
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Change in hepatocellular ballooning score. Hepatocellular ballooning was assessed on a scale of 0-2, with higher scores showing more severe ballooning.
baseline to 72 weeks
Steatosis: Patients With Improvement
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Patients with improvement in steatosis score. Steatosis was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores showing more severe steatosis.
baseline to 72 weeks
Steatosis: Change in Score
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Change in steatosis score. Steatosis was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores showing more severe steatosis.
baseline to 72 weeks
Lobular Inflammation: Patients With Improvement
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Patients with improvement in lobular inflammation score. Lobular inflammation was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores showing more severe lobular inflammation.
baseline to 72 weeks
Lobular Inflammation: Change in Score
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Change in lobular inflammation score. Lobular inflammation was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores showing more severe lobular inflammation.
baseline to 72 weeks
Portal Inflammation: Patients With Improvement
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Patients with improvement in portal inflammation score. Portal inflammation was assessed on a scale of 0-2, with higher scores showing more severe portal inflammation.
baseline to 72 weeks
Portal Inflammation: Change in Score
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Change in portal inflammation score. Portal inflammation was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores showing more severe portal inflammation.
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Alanine Aminotransferase
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Asparate Aminotransferase
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Alkaline Phosphatase
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in γ-glutamyl Transpeptidase
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Total Bilirubin
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in HDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in LDL Cholesterol
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Triglycerides
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Haemoglobin
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Haematocrit
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Mean Corpuscular Volume
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in White Blood Cell Count
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Platelet Count
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Bicarbonate
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Calcium
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Phosphate
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Creatinine
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Uric Acid
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Albumin
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Total Protein
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Prothrombin Time
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in International Normalised Ratio
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Fasting Serum Glucose
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Insulin
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in HOMA-IR
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Glycated Haemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Weight
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Body-mass Index
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Waist Circumference
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Waist-to-hip Ratio
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Physical Component Summary
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Short Form (36) Health Survey The SF-36 evaluates health-related quality of life in 8 domains consisting of two components: physical and mental. The score for each domain ranges from 0 to 100. Norm based scoring (based on the general US population) is used with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline to 72 weeks
Change in SF-36 Quality of Life Mental Component Summary
Time Frame: baseline to 72 weeks
Short Form (36) Health Survey The SF-36 evaluates health-related quality of life in 8 domains consisting of two components: physical and mental. The score for each domain ranges from 0 to 100. Norm based scoring (based on the general US population) is used with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. Higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline to 72 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Edward Doo, MD, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Clinical Trials on obeticholic acid

3
Subscribe