A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Bruthas Project

October 25, 2016 updated by: University of California, San Francisco
African American men who have sex with men and women (AAMSMW) are at particular risk for contracting and transmitting HIV, and represent a priority population for developing effective interventions. Despite the urgent need for effective prevention approaches for AAMSMW, to our knowledge no evidence-based HIV interventions have been developed and tested for this population. This study is a randomized controlled trial of the Bruthas Project(BP), an individual-level HIV prevention intervention, which builds on standardized HIV counseling and testing. Delivered in a series of four sessions by trained African American male counselors, the BP focuses on reviewing HIV transmission routes for male and female partners, strengthening sexual communication skills with both male and female partners, and improving condom use skills and other safer sex negotiation strategies. A randomized controlled trial of BP is necessary to determine the efficacy of the intervention and can lead to improved public health efforts at reducing HIV risk behavior among AAMSMW and in the African American community more generally. To evaluate the effect of the BP, the investigators will recruit and enroll a cohort of 400 AAMSMW who will be randomly assigned to either the intervention condition, in which they will be offered BP, or to the comparison condition, in which they will receive standardized HIV testing and counseling with referral to case management. The investigators will follow the cohort over 9 months and will assess participants at three time points: baseline, 3 months follow-up, and 6 months follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

African Americans account for half of all Americans currently living with AIDS, and men account for two-thirds of all African Americans with HIV. AAMSMW are at particular risk for contracting and transmitting HIV, and represent a priority population for developing effective interventions. Studies of AAMSMW conducted in multiple HIV-epicenters in the United States have reported high rates of unprotected intercourse with male and female partners, concurrent partnerships, and frequent substance use before sex, accompanied by non-disclosure and secrecy regarding sexual risk behaviors. These behavioral dynamics are likely to fuel transmission of HIV and other STDs in diverse sexual networks and communities. Despite the urgent need for effective prevention approaches for AAMSMW, to our knowledge no evidence-based HIV interventions have been developed and tested for this population.

We propose to test a behavioral prevention intervention, the BP, to reduce HIV-related sexual risk behavior among AAMSMW. The intervention was designed through four years of formative research with AAMSMW consisting of: (1) qualitative in-depth interviews, focus groups and field ethnography; (2) protocol and measure development; (3) pilot testing and evaluation; and (4) further refinement following process and preliminary outcome data. The BP counseling process was formulated on principles of the Information-Motivation-Behavior (IMB) theory of HIV prevention, and is characterized by an individual-level counseling process that is specifically tailored to recognize the social and cultural contexts that inform sexual behavior for AAMSMW. Delivered in a series of four sessions by trained African American male counselors, the BP focuses on reviewing HIV transmission routes for male and female partners, strengthening sexual communication skills with both male and female partners, and improving condom use skills and other safer sex negotiation strategies. Evidence thus far indicates that BP is an acceptable and feasible model for providing HIV prevention counseling to this population, and pilot outcome data show promising indications of behavior change. A team of trained BP staff have successfully utilized a multi-tiered outreach approach to identify AAMSMW, recruit eligible individuals, and engage and retain participants in a longitudinal evaluation design. A randomized controlled trial of BP is necessary to determine the efficacy of the intervention and can lead to improved public health efforts at reducing HIV risk behavior among AAMSMW and in the African American community more generally.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

396

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94105
        • University of California San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 or older
  • African American
  • Male
  • History of sex with male and female partners in the past two years
  • English speaker

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participation in previous research with Bruthas Project
  • non English speaker
  • identifies as gay

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Comparison Group, Standard HIV-CT
The comparison group will receive standardized HIV counseling and testing (HIV-CT), with referrals to case management.
This arm represents those receiving the standard HIV testing and counseling. We ultimately settled on the standard-of-care comparison group because our primary research question is whether the implementation of the intervention cast against the backdrop of usual care, in this case, HIV testing and counseling as mandated by the CDC, is efficacious. Thus, participants randomized to the comparison group will receive the current standard intervention which involves HIV testing, pre- and post-test counseling, plus linkage to case management. Individuals who test HIV-positive will be referred to post-test services including counseling for treatment options, HIV-positive support groups, and harm reduction workshops.
Experimental: Intervention Group, Bruthas Counseling
Participants assigned to this arm receive four individual HIV prevention counseling sessions.
The Bruthas Project HIV prevention intervention is a four-session, semi-structured individual risk reduction counseling program based on the Information-Motivation-Behavior (IMB) theoretical model. The counseling sessions are designed to complement standardized HIV-Counseling and Testing, and are delivered every 2-3 weeks over the course of 3 months. Each session lasts for approximately one hour, and is facilitated by a trained African American male counselor. The counselors engage with participants using open-ended questions and a non-judgmental, conversational style designed to elicit feedback on an individual's current level of HIV-related risk. The counselor then provides information and strengthens the participant's prevention skills.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sexual risk behavior with male and female partners
Time Frame: 9-months
Our primary outcome measure will feature two approaches to assessing HIV risk: we will assess (a) general sexual risk behaviors during the past 3 months and (b) event-level characteristics of sexual risk episodes for the past 1 month. Participants will report on general sexual activity during the past 3 months, including insertive vaginal sex, insertive/receptive anal sex, and giving/receiving oral sex. They will report on overall number of episodes, number of unprotected episodes, and episodes by partner type (main, casual, paying) and by partner gender (male, female).
9-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV Testing
Time Frame: 9 months follow up
We will ask participants the date of their most recent HIV test.
9 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emily A Arnold, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infection

Clinical Trials on Standard HIV Testing and Counseling

3
Subscribe