Risperidone vs. Olanzapine as add-on Treatment in Treatment Resistant Depression

January 24, 2011 updated by: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

A Double Blind Pilot Trial to Evaluate Efficacy Trends and Safety of Risperidone and Olanzapine as add-on Therapy to Serotonin Type Antidepressants in Subjects With Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)

Atypical neuroleptics may have antidepressant qualities in bipolar depression and in unipolar depression. Some data support the use of both Risperidone and Olanzapine, but there are no direct comparisons of their relative efficacy and tolerability in treatment resistant depression. The current study was designed as a pilot study to examine efficacy and tolerability of Olanzapine vs. Risperidone add on to a failed serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) in depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Overview of Study Design

This is a Canadian, multicentre, double blind, comparator trial in 42 patients with TRD. TRD is defined as the failure to respond adequately to two successive courses of different antidepressants at an adequate dose (at least fluoxetine 20 mg, citalopram 20 mg, paroxetine 20 mg, sertraline 100 mg, fluvoxamine 150 mg, venlafaxine 225 mg)) for at least 4 weeks. All subjects, at entry to the study will be currently not responding to treatment of at least 4 weeks duration of a serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a selective nor-epinephrine and serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SNRI). Non-response is defined as a score of 3 ("minimal improvement") or worse on the Clinical global Impression of Improvement .

The objective is to assess the appropriateness of the trial design and to determine sample size requirements for future controlled trials. In addition the efficacy and safety of oral doses of risperidone (.5-3 mg/day) and olanzapine (2.5-15 mg.day) as add-on therapy to any SSRI or SNRI in treatment resistant depression will be evaluated. Subjects meeting the screening criteria will enter a 6-week trial with risperidone or olanzapine added on to the current SSRI or SNRI therapy.

A medical/ psychiatric history, HAM-D-29 (only the first 17 items will be used for outcome), MADRS and HAM-A will be obtained at screening. At subsequent visits HAM-D, HAM-A, and MADRS will be performed and adverse events (spontaneous and using the CASES checklist) and concomitant medications will be collected.

Recruitment:

Subjects will drawn from two sources:

  1. Outpatients currently attending the clinic at the sites. These subjects will already be in treatment or may have been referred from the local communities of the clinics involved in this study for consultation. Should these subjects drop out or once they have completed the study they will receive the treatment as usual at each site.
  2. Advertisements. Advertisements will be placed in local media (radio, television, newspaper) identifying the nature of the study and providing a contact number. These advertisements will be approved by the local IRB's prior to posting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet all of the following criteria are eligible for this trial:

  1. Male or female out-patients;
  2. Aged between 18 and 65 years (extremes included);
  3. Subjects suffering from a current episode of non-psychotic, unipolar depression as determined by the depression section of the SCID-IV.
  4. Subjects with treatment resistant depression defined as failure to respond to two successive courses of monotherapy given in adequate doses for a minimum of 4 weeks with different antidepressants (the current course of antidepressant can be considered to second failed course) and;
  5. Subjects currently taking a SSRI or a SNRI for at least 4 weeks, at adequate dosage and not responding, as defined by a score of 3 or more on the CGI-I. and no dose change for 2 weeks prior to entry.
  6. A minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D
  7. Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting one or more of the following criteria cannot be selected:

  1. Subjects who are actively suicidal as determined by a score of 3 on the suicide item on the HAM-D or in the opinion of the treating physician;
  2. Other current (active symptomatology within the last 2 months) Axis I DSM IV diagnosis other than nicotine or caffeine dependence or other than an Anxiety disorder.
  3. Use of disallowed concomitant therapy; or other psychotropic medication except occasional benzodiazepines. (See "Rescue Medication");
  4. History of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence, within 3 months of entry into the trial);
  5. Seizure disorder requiring medication;
  6. Active medical condition that requires urgent attention or that would contra-indicate the use of risperidone or olanzapine. For example stable thyroid disease or asthma would be acceptable, whereas acute hepatitis would not;
  7. Participation in an investigational drug trial within 30 days prior to the start of the trial
  8. Known sensitivity to risperidone, olanzapine or the antidepressant;
  9. History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS);
  10. Subjects who are at imminent risk of injury to self or others, or causing significant damage to property, as judged by the investigator;
  11. Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding;
  12. Female subject of childbearing potential without adequate contraception (sterilization, barrier, IUD, oral contraceptives, intramuscular or subdermal administration of depot-progestagens);

15. Previous exposure to risperidone or olanzapine during the current episode.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Risperidone
Commence at 0.5 mg once daily Increase, blindly, to 1 mg and then by 1 mg at discretion of clinicians through weeks 1-4 to a maximum of 3 mg.
Risperidone will commence at 0.5 mg per day in a single daily dose given once in the evening. Clinicians will have the option, at each visit of increasing the risperidone dose to a maximum of 3 mg/day based on subject response and tolerability (please see Titration Recommendations below).
Experimental: Olanzapine
Commence at 2.5 mg once daily Increase to 5.0 mg, blindly, and then by 5 mg at the discretion of the clinician through weeks 1 - 4 to a maximum of 15 mg
Olanzapine will commence at 2.5 mg per day in a single daily dose given once in the evening. Clinicians will have the option, at each visit, of increasing the olanzapine dose to a maximum of 15 mg/day based on subject response and tolerability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 1 week
Time Frame: day one
Subject to be eligible for this trial must have a minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D which will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured on the HAM-D 17 and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day one
Change from Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)at 1 week
Time Frame: day one
MADRS will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured by the MADRS and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day one
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) at 1 week
Time Frame: day one
Impact on anxiety will be measured by the HAM-A over the 6 weeks.
day one
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 2 weeks
Time Frame: day 8
Subject to be eligible for this trial must have a minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D which will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured on the HAM-D 17 and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 8
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 3 weeks
Time Frame: day 15
Subject to be eligible for this trial must have a minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D which will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured on the HAM-D 17 and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 15
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 4 weeks
Time Frame: day 22
Subject to be eligible for this trial must have a minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D which will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured on the HAM-D 17 and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 22
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 5 weeks
Time Frame: day 29
Subject to be eligible for this trial must have a minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D which will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured on the HAM-D 17 and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 29
Change from Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 6 weeks
Time Frame: day 43
Subject to be eligible for this trial must have a minimum score of 16 on the 17 item HAM-D which will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured on the HAM-D 17 and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 43
Change from Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)at 2 weeks
Time Frame: day 8
MADRS will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured by the MADRS and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 8
Change from Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)at 3 weeks
Time Frame: day 15
MADRS will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured by the MADRS and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 15
Change from Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)at 4 weeks
Time Frame: day 22
MADRS will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured by the MADRS and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 22
Change from Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)at 5 weeks
Time Frame: day 29
MADRS will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured by the MADRS and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 29
Change from Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS)at 6 weeks
Time Frame: day 43
MADRS will be obtained at screening. Efficacy will be measured by the MADRS and defined as a 50% decrease from baseline to week 6.
day 43
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: day 8
Impact on anxiety will be measured by the HAM-A over the 6 weeks.
day 8
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) at 3 weeks
Time Frame: day 15
Impact on anxiety will be measured by the HAM-A over the 6 weeks.
day 15
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) at 4 weeks
Time Frame: day 15
Impact on anxiety will be measured by the HAM-A over the 6 weeks.
day 15
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) at 5 weeks
Time Frame: day 22
Impact on anxiety will be measured by the HAM-A over the 6 weeks.
day 22
Change from baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) at 6 weeks
Time Frame: day 43
Impact on anxiety will be measured by the HAM-A over the 6 weeks.
day 43

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Improvement Scale - Improvement
Time Frame: day one
Subjects currently taking a SSRI or a SNRI for at least 4 weeks, at adequate dosage and not responding, as defined by a score of 3 or more on the CGI-I.
day one
Change from Baseline of Weight at 6 weeks
Time Frame: day 43
Weight (Kg) will be measured with subjects at screening then at week 6.
day 43

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Levitt, MD, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
  • Study Director: Raymond Lam, MD, University of British Columbia
  • Study Director: Yves Chaput, MD, University of Manitoba
  • Study Director: Murray Enns, MD, University of McGill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2004

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subjects Had Unipolar, Non-psychotic Major Depression

Clinical Trials on Risperidone

3
Subscribe