Guided Self-Help for Binge Eating Disorder

March 22, 2019 updated by: Stanford University

Comparison of Integrative Response Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Guided Self-Help for Binge Eating Disorder

The proposed study will employ a randomized design to evaluate the efficacy of two group-based guided self-help treatments: Integrative Response Therapy (IRT) and Cognitive Behavior Therapy Guided Self-Help, a treatment of known efficacy, in group-format (CBT-GSHg) in the treatment of Binge Eating Disorder (BED), and explore (1) moderators and mediators of treatment, (2) the relative cost-effectiveness of the two treatments, and (3) between group differences on secondary measures (e.g., eating disorder and general psychopathology).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The focus of this proposal is on BED among an adult population. Guided self-help treatments (GSH) for BED appear promising and may be more readily disseminated than efficacious specialty treatments such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) given the latter's administration costs and time requirements. The proposed study uses a new group-based, guided self-help BED treatment called Integrative Response Therapy (IRT). IRT is primarily based upon the affect regulation theory of binge eating (e.g., binge eating is an attempt to alter distressing emotional states), while adding cognitive restructuring techniques. IRT teaches effective ways to cope with aversive emotions and reframe faulty cognitions while reducing vulnerabilities that are likely to lead to problematic emotional responding & cognitions such as physical needs (e.g., hunger, sleep deprivation), interpersonal conflict, and, when possible, unpleasant external events. IRT's primary goal is to significantly decrease episodes of binge eating and associated eating disorder pathology.

CBT-GSH is a frequently used manual-based form of GSH that has demonstrated efficacy. CBT, based on the restraint model, intervenes via behavioral techniques to replace restrained eating with more regular eating patterns and cognitive techniques to restructure an individual's problematic thoughts that over-evaluate shape and weight. Research literature indicates that CBT-GSH is a viable self-help BED treatment that appears to be superior to wait-list control conditions, equivalent to IPT, a specialty treatment, and superior to Behavioral Weight Loss treatment at 2-year follow-up. There are then, a number of reasons for further research on GSH in general and CBT-gsh specifically.

The proposed study will lay the groundwork for identifying which GSH treatment should be investigated in a subsequent, larger trial that would evaluate a clinically relevant algorithm for the treatment of BED.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet DSM-IV research criteria for Binge Eating Disorder (although frequency criteria will be lessened to that proposed in DSM-V;1 time per week for 3 months).
  • Be male or female between 18 and 75 years.
  • Be available and committed to attend full treatment and follow-up
  • Adequate transportation to the clinic.
  • Be literate in English (this is required for inclusion because sessions will be conducted in English and written and visual materials are in English).
  • Have a Primary Health Care Provider.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current psychosis or severe depression with suicidal risk; a severity that would likely require additional psychotherapeutic or psychopharmacologic treatment or interfere with participation in this group therapy or with day to day functioning. Depressive disorders not meeting the intensity factor of the exclusion criteria may be entered to the study.
  • Current Anorexia or Bulimia Nervosa or purging behaviors over the past six months.
  • Current drug and/or alcohol abuse/dependence.
  • Current medication primarily indicated for its effect on appetite or weight, unless the participant is willing to withdraw from such medications under supervision of their primary care physician.
  • Current chemotherapy.
  • Current participation in psychotherapy, unless the participant is willing to discontinue treatment.
  • Psychotropic medication use, including antidepressants, are acceptable if doses were stable for at least 1 month prior to assessment.
  • Pregnant or plans to become pregnant within the next 12 months.
  • BMI greater than 45.
  • Planning to have Bariatric surgery within the next 12 months.
  • No transportation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Integrative Response Therapy
IRT is based on affect regulation theories of binge eating and adds emphasis on cognitive restructuring techniques. IRT is a 10 session, group-based, guided-self-help treatment that works to decrease binge eating by primarily enhancing emotion coping skills, in addition to transforming faulty interpretations and reducing vulnerabilities (e.g., interpersonal events) that risk overwhelming emotion and problematic cognitions.
A 10 session manualized version of IRT is employed . Each of the 10 group therapy sessions will be 60 minutes in length. Non-specialty trained Masters-level therapists will lead IRT after undergoing IRT training with the PI.
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy guided self-help (CBT-GSH), based on the restraint model of binge eating, has been adapted from individual format to a 10 session, group-based therapy for the purpose of this study. The book 'Overcoming Binge Eating' is employed in the present study and consists of Part 1, an educational background on BED, and Part 2, a 6 step treatment program to overcome binge eating.
A 10 session manualized version of CBT-GSH is employed . Each of the 10 group therapy sessions will be 60 minutes in length. Non-specialty trained Masters-level therapists will lead CBT-GSH after undergoing CBT-GSH training with the PI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of binge days over the previous 28 days
Time Frame: 16 weeks post-treatment
Assessed via the Eating Disorder Examination
16 weeks post-treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
emotion driven urges to eat
Time Frame: 16 weeks post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Assessed via the Emotional Eating Scale
16 weeks post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
adaptation time intervals and response accuracy for emotion related stimuli
Time Frame: 16 weeks post-treatment
Assessed via the Emotion Conflict Adaptation Task
16 weeks post-treatment
depression
Time Frame: 16 weeks post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Assessed via the Beck Depression Inventory
16 weeks post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
self-esteem
Time Frame: 16 weeks post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Assessed via the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
16 weeks post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
quality of life
Time Frame: post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Assessed via the Quality of Well-Being Scale
post-treatment, 6 and 12 month follow-up
use of health services
Time Frame: at (approximately) 1 month intervals throughout 16 week intervention (4 times total)
Assessed via the Health Care Diary
at (approximately) 1 month intervals throughout 16 week intervention (4 times total)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Athena Robinson, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Binge Eating Disorder

Clinical Trials on Integrative Response Therapy

3
Subscribe