Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) vs. CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

February 16, 2012 updated by: Accuray Incorporated

International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife® for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To compare the efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) to CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most deadly cancer in the world. It is primarily seen in areas where hepatitis is endemic, such as Asia, but other risk factors include alcoholic cirrhosis.

Surgical resection and/or transplantation remain the only curative options. However, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. For these patients with unresectable tumors, a variety of treatment options are available, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), radioactive microspheres, microwave coagulation, laser-induced thermotherapy, and percutaneous alcohol injection, all of which have similar survival rates. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable HCC is a relatively new treatment option made available because of significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and radiation delivery techniques. Although follow-up is limited, results show encouraging local control rates. Some investigators have combined TACE with fractionated conventional radiotherapy as a means of intensifying local therapy, with evidence of efficacy.

TACE remains the dominant mode of local therapy for unresectable HCC. However, recurrence rates are high. Because SBRT is rapidly becoming an accepted local therapy for hepatic lesions, its role in treating HCC needs to be further defined. Moreover, once patients have recurred after initial TACE, it is unclear if additional TACE will be as effective or if another mode of local therapy such as SBRT would be preferable.

We propose to conduct a multicenter randomized study comparing TACE vs. SBRT using CyberKnife for locally recurrent HCC. Locally recurrent HCC will include lesions that persist, progress or recur minimum 3 months after initial TACE.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma by one of the following:

    1. Histopathology
    2. One radiographic technique that confirms a lesion >2 cm with arterial enhancement with washout on delayed phase.
  • Hepatic lesion in patients for whom surgical resection is not possible or would not result in an opportunity for cure.
  • Radiographic evidence of persistent, progressive or recurrent disease in an area previously treated with TACE. This evaluation should be determined after 6 weeks of initial TACE.
  • Multi-specialty evaluation whereby the recurrent liver lesion was deemed by both the attending radiation oncologist and interventional radiologist amenable to treatment by the respective modality

    1. Eligible patients must undergo an IV contrast CT scan of the liver within 6 weeks of enrollment onto the study; a contrast enhanced liver MRI may be substituted for the contrast liver CT
    2. A recent serum AFP must be obtained within 4 weeks of enrollment.
  • Unifocal liver tumors not to exceed 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension. Multifocal lesions will be restricted to lesions that can be treated within a single target volume within the same liver segment and to an aggregate of 7.5 cm as long as the dose constraints to normal tissue can be met.
  • Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 (Appendix I).
  • Patients with liver disease classified as Child Pugh class A/B, if Child's class B, score must be 8 or less.
  • Life expectancy >= 6 months
  • Age >= 18 years old
  • Albumin >= 2.5 g/dL
  • Total Bilirubin <= 3 mg/dL
  • INR <= 1.5
  • Creatinine <= 2.0 mg/dL
  • Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this study
  • Ability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior radiation for the recurrent liver tumor
  • Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen
  • Prior RFA to index lesion
  • Liver transplant
  • Tumors greater than 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension
  • Portal vein thrombus
  • Large varices within 2 cm of index lesion (seen on cross section imaging)
  • Contraindication to receiving radiotherapy
  • Active gastrointestinal bleed within 2 weeks of study enrollment
  • Ascites refractory to medical therapy
  • Women who are pregnant
  • Administration of chemotherapy within the last 1 month
  • Presence of multifocal lesions located in different lobes of the liver or extrahepatic metastases
  • Participation in another concurrent systemic treatment protocol
  • Prior history of malignancy other than HCC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Transarterial Chemoembolization
Transarterial Chemoembolization will be given within 12 weeks and up to 3 staged procedures, depending on the architecture of the tumor vasculature.
Active Comparator: CyberKnife SBRT
Dose is 45 Gy (15 Gy in 3 fractions) or 36 Gy(12 Gy in 3 fractions). Tumors should receive the higher dose unless normal tissue constraints cannot be met.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from local progression
Time Frame: 12 months
Freedom from local progression at time T is defined as lack of local progression in the treated liver lesion in the set of patients alive and on study at time T and without distant progression up to time T.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: 6, 12 and 18 months
Progression-free survival will be defined as subject alive and free from local progression, disease recurrence elsewhere in the liver, extrahepatic progression, or clinical deterioration unattributable to another underlying medical condition in the absence of clear radiographic findings of progressive disease.
6, 12 and 18 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: Up to three years following therapy
Overall survival will be determined as a measure of time from diagnosis of initial recurrence until death from any cause.
Up to three years following therapy
Serum AFP levels
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months

Serum AFP levels will be measured at specific points during the study. The 2 endpoints to be analyzed are:

  • Initial AFP levels
  • AFP response - the percent decrease in serum AFP levels from the initial result to the eventual nadir after therapy

These endpoints will be correlated to the clinical endpoints (freedom from local progression, progression free-survival, and overall survival).

3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Freedom from local progression
Time Frame: 6 and 18 months
Freedom from local progression at time T is defined as lack of local progression in the treated liver lesion in the set of patients alive and on study at time T and without distant progression up to time T.
6 and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Albert Koong, MD, PhD, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Study Chair: Daniel Chang, MD, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Study Chair: Nishita Kothary, MD, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2012

Last Verified

February 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Transarterial Chemoembolization

3
Subscribe