Motivational Interviewing (MI) for African Americans With Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)

January 11, 2017 updated by: Tracie Collins, MD, MPH, University of Kansas Medical Center

Promoting Walking in African Americans With Peripheral Arterial Disease

The investigators are conducting a clinical research trial to determine the role of motivational interviewing (MI) on promoting home-based walking therapy to improve walking ability in African Americans with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). African Americans are more than two times as likely as non-Hispanic whites to suffer from PAD. For patients with PAD, there is a significant risk for poor walking ability and limb loss. One major treatment for PAD is walking therapy but the traditional methods for the delivery of this treatment have required frequent visits to a university or hospital-based site. The investigators will address the role of self-managed walking program, to be conducted at or near the home, to improve limb function. In order to motivate the participants to walk, the investigators included two different intervention strategies: MI and patient-centered counseling for exercise (PACE). The investigators hypothesize that participants randomized to the MI arm will have a greater increase in their walking distance, compared to those receiving Patient-Centered Assessment and Counseling for Exercise (PACE) and the control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

MI is an effective counseling method in individuals who are less ready to change their behavior (i.e., low motivation). Thus, MI is an ideal counseling method to promote home-based walking among AAs with PAD. In our pilot study to promote home-based walking, we used a counseling protocol, Patient-centered Assessment and Counseling for Exercise (PACE)(Sallis et al), which targets known modifiable determinants of behavior change (e.g., social support). Using PACE, we demonstrated an improvement in stair climbing ability and lower limb blood flow (as measured by the ankle-brachial index). Improvements in these lower limb outcomes offer support for the use of PACE counseling in PAD, but PACE does not specifically address low motivation - a critical target for AAs with PAD. In addition, PACE is not culturally sensitive. In our proposed trial, we hypothesize that MI will improve walking distance and reduce walking impairment more than PACE in AAs with PAD.

There is a critical need to improve lower limb outcomes in AAs with PAD. Our long-term goal is to reduce debilitating functional limitations and amputations in AAs with PAD. The overall objective of this application is to determine the most effective counseling strategy to improve home-based walking in AAs with PAD. We have assembled an excellent and diverse research team with the requisite skills and experience needed for this study. Moreover, we have robust pilot data to support the study hypotheses and ensure successful completion of the study.

We will deliver the PACE protocol or MI for 6 months, using both face-to-face visits and telephone contact. Our primary outcome is walking distance (as measured by the widely used and well-validated 6-minute walk test) at the end of active intervention (6 months). Secondary outcomes are walking distance as measured beyond the active phase of intervention (12 months), use of home-based walking (as measured by accelerometry), and lower limb blood flow (as measured by the ankle brachial index - ABI). Our comparison group will receive the same print material as the two interventions as well as contact every three months to update any changes in contact information and to assess their health status. We will randomize 204 participants to one of three arms: Control or Treatment One (Tx1); PACE or Treatment Two (Tx2); or MI, also referred to as Treatment Three (Tx3). In addition, we will determine the efficacy of PACE (Tx2) to increase walking distance in AAs with PAD, compared to Control (Tx1).

Primary Hypothesis:

1. At 6 months, AAs with PAD randomized to MI (Tx3) will have a greater increase in their walking distance, compared to those receiving PACE (Tx2) and the control group (Tx1).

Secondary Hypotheses:

  1. AAs with PAD randomized to MI (Tx3) will have a greater increase in their walking distance at 12 months - a follow-up period beyond the six months of active intervention - compared to those receiving PACE (Tx2) and compared to the control group (Tx1).
  2. At 6 and 12 months, AAs with PAD randomized to MI (Tx3) will have a greater increase in their home-based walking and their lower limb blood flow, compared to those receiving PACE (Tx2) and to the control group (Tx1).
  3. At 6 and 12 months, AAs with PAD randomized to PACE (Tx2) will have a greater increase in their walking distance compared to those randomized to control (Tx1).

Exploratory Aim:

We will explore potential mediators (self-efficacy, social support, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation) and moderators (co-morbidities, leg symptom type, stage of change) of intervention effects on walking distance, home-based walking, and lower limb blood flow among AAs with PAD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

174

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Fairway, Kansas, United States, 66205
        • Clinical and Translational Science Unit
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214
        • KU School of Medicine-Wichita

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. African American (determined by self-report)
  2. Lived most of their life in the United States
  3. Resting ABI <0.995
  4. English Speaking
  5. Has a telephone

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently walking for exercise at least 5 days per week (i.e., a PACE score ranging from 5-8); the rationale is that a person who is currently walking for at least 5 days per week is already sufficiently active and therefore not a member of the target population for our motivational home-based walking intervention.
  2. Prior major amputation (foot or lower leg) or critical leg ischemia (tissue loss, gangrene, or ulcers)
  3. Rest pain with ABI <0.4 and non-palpable femoral pulses without prior evaluation by a vascular surgeon, given the need for evaluation for the role of more invasive therapy prior to recommending walking therapy
  4. Leg revascularization within 3 months of enrollment or plans for revascularization during the study period; the rationale is that post intervention recovery and potential complications are likely to limit the patient's ability to adhere to the study protocol.
  5. Use of supplemental oxygen; the rationale for this is concern for participant safety and potential limited ability to participate in the study secondary to breathing difficulty.
  6. Myocardial infarction within the preceding 3 months; the rationale for this is participant safety and the potential risk for complications and/or the need for supervised cardiac rehabilitation following the event.
  7. Resting blood pressure > 200/110 mmHg; the rationale for this is participant safety, as blood pressure may further increase during exercise and increase risk for a cerebrovascular event or myocardial infarction.
  8. Exercise-induced coronary ischemic symptoms, or exercise-induced ST depression > 2.0 mm; the rationale for this is participant safety and the need for further cardiac evaluation prior to involvement in walking therapy (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, 2006).
  9. Inability to walk for 2 minutes; the rationale being that people who cannot walk for 2 minutes would not be able to complete the necessary submaximal treadmill test, which is used to screen for coronary ischemic symptoms. We will also exclude anyone who can walk for 20 minutes or more during the submaximal treadmill test. Anyone who can complete the submaximal test would not have significant walking impairment and would not get that much out of the study. Short Physical Performance Battery score of 10 or higher as such persons do not have a clinically significant impairment in mobility; therefore, we will exclude anyone who scores a 10 or higher (out of a maximum of 12 points).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Active Comparator: Motivational Interviewing
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an effective counseling method in individuals who are less ready to change their behavior. 9 MI sessions will be conducted over the course of the six month intervention.
9 sessions of MI from baseline to six months
Active Comparator: PACE
Patient-centered Assessment and Counseling for Exercise (PACE) is a protocol that targets known modifiable determinants of behavior change to motivate participants to increase their physical activity (walking).
9 sessions of PACE delivered from baseline to six months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Distance walked in 6 minutes
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessment of balance and basic physical mobility
Baseline
Blood work for glucose and lipid levels
Time Frame: Baseline
glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and a fasting lipid profile
Baseline
Adherence to Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline
The participants will be asked to wear accelerometers for seven days at each of the three time points.
Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)
Time Frame: Baseline
An assessment that is used to determine the severity of peripheral arterial disease.
Baseline
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline
The SF-12 and VascQOL questionnaires will be used to assess QOL.
Baseline
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: 12 months
Distance walked in 6 minutes
12 months
6 minute walk test
Time Frame: Baseline
Distance walked in 6 minutes
Baseline
Short physical performance battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessment of balance and basic physical mobility
6 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of balance and basic physical mobility
12 months
Blood work for glucose and lipid levels
Time Frame: 6 months
HbA1C and a fasting lipid profile
6 months
Blood work for glucose and lipid levels
Time Frame: 12 months
HbA1C and a fasting lipid profile
12 months
Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)
Time Frame: 12 months
An assessment that is used to determine the severity of peripheral arterial disease.
12 months
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months
The SF-12 and VascQOL questionnaires will be used to assess QOL.
6 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
The SF-12 and VascQOL questionnaires will be used to assess QOL.
12 months
Dietary habits for fats and fruits and vegetables
Time Frame: baseline
Assessment of fats and fruit and vegetable intake
baseline
Dietary habits for fats and fruits and vegetables
Time Frame: 6 months
Assessment of fats and fruit and vegetable intake
6 months
Dietary habits for fats and fruits and vegetables
Time Frame: 12 months
Assessment of fats and fruit and vegetable intake
12 months
Adherence to Physical Activity
Time Frame: 6 months
The participants will be asked to wear accelerometers for seven days at each of the three time points.
6 months
Adherence to Physical Activity
Time Frame: 12 months
The participants will be asked to wear accelerometers for seven days at each of the three time points.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tracie C Collins, MD, MPH, KU School of Medicine-Wichita

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 7R01HL098909-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on Motivational Interviewing

3
Subscribe